Case law

Oak Laminates Division of Oak Materials Group v. United States

628 F. Supp. 1577 · United States Court of International Trade · Sep 25, 1984

Jarvis Clark Co. v. United States, 733 F.2d 873, 878 , reh'g denied, 739 F.2d 628 (Fed.Cir.1984); E.R. Hawthorne & Co. v. United States, 730 F.2d 1490 (Fed.Cir.1984). … Deringer, Inc. v. United States, 66 Cust.Ct. 378 , C.D. 4218 (1971) and Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc. v.

Thomas Flores v. Department of Defense

2014 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 19, 2014

While this appeal was pending in the regional office, the Board issued decisions in Conyers v. Department of Defense, 115 M.S.P.R. 572 (2010), and Northover v. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 546 (1985).

Cedric D. Clay v. Department of the Army

2016 MSPB 12 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 2, 2016

See, e.g., Cocchiara v. … However, following the issuance of the initial decision in this appeal, the Board issued Savage v.

Waddell v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 424 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 18, 1926

.) *427 This question was squarely before the Board of General Appraisers (No. 3) in the case of Cox & Schreiber v. United States, T. D. 40086, 45 Treas. Dec. 381 . … Later, the same division of the Board of General Appraisers, in the case of Buschman Bros. v. United States, T. D. 40460, 46 Treas.

M

8 I. & N. Dec. 24 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1958

Malaya v. Savaretti, 139 F. … Browned, supra, have become the 30 law of the case with respect to this appellant.

Consolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. v. The United States

348 F.2d 941 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

In Zoda v. … Co. v. United States, supra, slip op. p. 9; Lester Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct.Cl. 536, 539 (1960).

Davis v. United States

180 Ct. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Repeatedly, this court has held that it may freely reexamine questions of law as their determination by the Board is not binding upon the plaintiff nor binding upon this court. E.g., Natus Corp. v. … a review of the entire record, Midwest Spray & Coating Co. v.

Stansbury v. Bond

482 F.2d 968 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 16, 1973

See Hemstreet v. Rohland, supra; Kade-mann v. Bollmann, 421 F.2d 1372 , 57 CCPA 907 (1970). … Hemstreet v.

Blair ex rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co. v. United States

99 Ct. Cl. 71 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1942

United States v. Gleeson, 175 U. S. 588 ; United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co., 234 U. S. 236 ; Ripley v. United States, 223 U. S. 695 ; Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 445 . … Ripley v. United States, 223 U. S. 695 ; Globe Grain & Milling Company v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 595 .

Birmingham v. Randall

171 F.2d 957 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 7, 1948

See Steenstrup v. Heath, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 981, 95 F. (2d) 514, 37 USPQ 205 ; McBride v. Teeple, Jr., 27 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 961, 109 F. (2d) 789, 44 USPQ 523 ; Buffington et al. v. Blair et al., 28 C. C. P. A. … See Lindemeyr v. Hoffman, 18 App. D. C. 1, 1901 C. D. 353, and Gallagher v. Hien, 25 App. D. C. 77, 1905 C. D. 624.

United States v. Overton

6 Ct. Cust. 248 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 21, 1915

So in Stratton v. … More precisely in point is the case of Knauth v. United States ( 155 Fed., 144 ; T.

Patterson v. Clements

136 F.2d 1002 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 6, 1943

In the Collins v. … Sundberg et al. v. Schmitt, 379 O. G. 441 , 1929 C. D. 132 (58 App. D. C. 292, 29 F. (2d) 880; Collins v. Olsen, 503 O. G. 3 , 1939 C. D. 405, 26 C. C. P. A. 1017, 102 F. (2d) 828; Bainbridge v. Walton, 509 O.

In re Dien

680 F.2d 151 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 4, 1982

In Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. … III, sec. 2; Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1910). An advisory opinion by the PTO does not fit in either of those categories and we lack the power to review it. Swingline v.

Robert L. Solze and Lois M. Dimitre v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 118 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 4, 2013

For example, in Ribaudo v. … To the contrary, in Erspamer v.

Application of Paul J. Naquin, Jr

398 F.2d 863 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1968

International Standard Electric Corp. v. Ooms, Com’r, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 157 F.2d 73 (1946). … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 481 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 (1936).

13-11 062

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

See Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App.439, 448 (1995). In making all determinations, the Board must fully consider the lay assertions of record. … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994) (a veteran is competent to report on that of which he or she has personal knowledge).

Quality Trust Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 29, 2016

Dixon v. Shinseki, 741F.3d1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citations omitted); see also Avant Assessment, LLC, ASBCA No. 58867, 15-1BCAii36,137 at 176,386. … . 59983, Appeal of Quality Trust Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Bogoslowsky v. Huse

142 F.2d 75 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 4, 1944

In the case of Severson v. Olson, 20 C. C. P. A. … See Wirshing et al. v. Pine et al., supra; Collins v. Olsen, 26 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1017, 102 F. (2d) 828.

Mary Reese v. Department of the Navy

2025 MSPB 1 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 31, 2025

¶30 In Edwards v. … Young v. Department of Homeland Security, 2024 MSPB 18, ¶ 30; Elder v.

Armour v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 296 · United States Customs Court · Dec 9, 1952

S. 394 ; United States v. Tower & Son, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421 , T. D. 42058; Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United States, 23 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 7, T. D. 47654. In Barr v. United States, 324 U. … D. 48976; United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 112, C. A. D. 351; United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, 34 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 118, C. A. D. 352.