Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Hardware Res., Inc. v. United States

    2026 CIT 38 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 21, 2026

    Corp. v. United States, 159 F. Supp. 2d 714, 718 (CIT 2001) (citing Heveafil Sdn. Bhd. v. United States, 25 CIT 147, 149 (2001)), aff’d sub nom., Shandong Huarong Gen. Grp. Corp. v. United States, 60 F. … the length of the board.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SALUTARE, S.A. DE C.V. v. Remedy Drinks Pty Ltd

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 16, 2021

    Notwithstanding, the Board has no jurisdiction over non-party depositions or adverse witness depositions taken by subpoena. See Ate My Heart, Inc. v. … See Jain v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. The United States

    429 F.2d 431 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

    Co. v. … S. v. Rice] v. U. S., 317 U.S. 61 [ 63 S.Ct. 120 , 87 L.Ed. 53 ] ; Choteau [sic] v. U. S., 95 U.S. 61 [ 24 L.Ed. 371 ]; Crook Co. v. U. S., 270 U.S. 4 [ 46 S.Ct. 184 , 70 L.Ed. 438 ].

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Baughman v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 563 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 13, 1991

    Baughman, seeks reversal of an April 5, 1990, decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) denying service connection for her late husband’s arteriosclerotic cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease, as … See Oppenheimer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 370, 372 (1991). See also Thompson v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 251 (1991). III.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In re Wyer

    655 F.2d 221 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 30, 1981

    In support of this proposition the board cited the leading cases of Philips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 , 171 USPQ 641 (3d Cir. 1971), and I.C.E. … Philips Electronics & Pharmaceutical Industries *226 Corp. v. Thermal & Electronic Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164, 1170 , 171 USPQ 641, 645 (3d Cir. 1971); I.C.E. Corp. v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Access Personnel Services, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 15, 2016

    See Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Mansoor International Development Services, ASBCA No. 58423, 14-1 BCA ~ 35,742. … See Pathman Construction Co. v. United States, 817 F.2d 1573, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1987). We have reviewed all the government's other contentions, but they are not persuasive.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robin Sabio v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2017 MSPB 4 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017

    See Panter v. … Oncale v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • CAMPOS

    13 I. & N. Dec. 148 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1969

    Crisologo Redondo Cam- pos v. INS, 402 F.2d 758. … Stinnett, 333 U.S. 591, 597 (1948) ; see U.S. v. Rangel-Perez, 179 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. Cal. 1959). 2 Frisina v. Esperdy, 61 Civ. 221 (S.D.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cattus v. United States

    4 Ct. Cust. 9 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 12, 1913

    The board, however, held against these claims, and found that the articles in question were not toys in fact and were not proven to be known commercially as such. In the case of Illfelder v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. … The court feels justified by the record in refusing to disturb that finding of the board. In the case of the Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 102 ; T.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • West Point Utilities, LLC

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 4, 2025

    In Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United States, 609 F.3d 1323 (Fed. … Group, Inc. v. United States, 289 F.3d 795, 800-01 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Travel Ctr. v. Barram, 236 F.3d 1316, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of Bailey v. Commissioner

    79 T.C. 441 · United States Tax Court · Sep 9, 1982

    See also Brown v. Elmendorf, 87 Tex. 56 , 26 S.W. 1043, 1044 (1894); Long v. Moore, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 363 , 48 S.W. 43, 46 (1898); cf. Nowlin v. Clary, 178 S.W. 571, 573 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915). … Slay v. Burnett Trust, 187 S.W.2d at 389 ; Langford v. Shamburger, supra at 442 . Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. v. The United States

    348 F.2d 941 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

    In Zoda v. … Co. v. United States, supra, slip op. p. 9; Lester Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct.Cl. 536, 539 (1960).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Donnelly v. United States

    134 F. Supp. 635 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1955

    Goldstein v. United States, Ct.Cl., 130 F.Supp. 330 . Appointment is an executive function, involving the exercise of executive discretion. Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 , 20 S.Ct. 574 , 44 L.Ed. 774 . … United States v. McLean, 95 U.S. 750, 753 , 24 L.Ed. 579 ; Amundson v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 201 , 128 Ct.Cl. 80 ; Coleman v. United States, 100 Ct.Cl. 41 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • 08-34 107

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2014

    See Lathan v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 359, 365 (1995). … . § 3.310(b); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Stein v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 36 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 18, 1910

    The Board of General Appraisers found as facts: 1. … Muser v. Magone ( 155 U. S., 240 ); United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16 ); United States v. Herman (91 Fed. Rep., 116); United States v. Kenworthy (68 Fed.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • In re Dien

    680 F.2d 151 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 4, 1982

    In Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. … III, sec. 2; Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1910). An advisory opinion by the PTO does not fit in either of those categories and we lack the power to review it. Swingline v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • McWilliams Dredging Co. v. United States

    118 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

    In the case of Martin Wunderlich v. … The contract does not provide for an appeal on a question of law to this Board.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Corbett v. Chisholm

    568 F.2d 759 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 29, 1977

    The Board Opinion The board, citing Stalego v. … In Cryns v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jean N. Nicolaou v. Michael Cooperman

    438 F.2d 993 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1971

    However, despite the board’s reliance on Brand v. … Appellee suggests that the board cited Brand v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. United States

    643 F.2d 729 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1981

    Since it is impermissible for the court to probe the decisional and thought processes of the Board and its members, see United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 (1941), Montrose Chemical Corp. v. … In United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.