Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Hardware Res., Inc. v. United States
2026 CIT 38 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 21, 2026
Corp. v. United States, 159 F. Supp. 2d 714, 718 (CIT 2001) (citing Heveafil Sdn. Bhd. v. United States, 25 CIT 147, 149 (2001)), aff’d sub nom., Shandong Huarong Gen. Grp. Corp. v. United States, 60 F. … the length of the board.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedSALUTARE, S.A. DE C.V. v. Remedy Drinks Pty Ltd
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 16, 2021
Notwithstanding, the Board has no jurisdiction over non-party depositions or adverse witness depositions taken by subpoena. See Ate My Heart, Inc. v. … See Jain v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. The United States
429 F.2d 431 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970
Co. v. … S. v. Rice] v. U. S., 317 U.S. 61 [ 63 S.Ct. 120 , 87 L.Ed. 53 ] ; Choteau [sic] v. U. S., 95 U.S. 61 [ 24 L.Ed. 371 ]; Crook Co. v. U. S., 270 U.S. 4 [ 46 S.Ct. 184 , 70 L.Ed. 438 ].
Cited 28 timesPublished1 Vet. App. 563 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 13, 1991
Baughman, seeks reversal of an April 5, 1990, decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) denying service connection for her late husband’s arteriosclerotic cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease, as … See Oppenheimer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 370, 372 (1991). See also Thompson v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 251 (1991). III.
Cited 15 timesPublished655 F.2d 221 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 30, 1981
In support of this proposition the board cited the leading cases of Philips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 , 171 USPQ 641 (3d Cir. 1971), and I.C.E. … Philips Electronics & Pharmaceutical Industries *226 Corp. v. Thermal & Electronic Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164, 1170 , 171 USPQ 641, 645 (3d Cir. 1971); I.C.E. Corp. v.
Cited 55 timesPublishedAccess Personnel Services, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 15, 2016
See Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Mansoor International Development Services, ASBCA No. 58423, 14-1 BCA ~ 35,742. … See Pathman Construction Co. v. United States, 817 F.2d 1573, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1987). We have reviewed all the government's other contentions, but they are not persuasive.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobin Sabio v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2017 MSPB 4 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017
See Panter v. … Oncale v.
Cited 1 timesPublished13 I. & N. Dec. 148 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1969
Crisologo Redondo Cam- pos v. INS, 402 F.2d 758. … Stinnett, 333 U.S. 591, 597 (1948) ; see U.S. v. Rangel-Perez, 179 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. Cal. 1959). 2 Frisina v. Esperdy, 61 Civ. 221 (S.D.
Cited 4 timesPublished4 Ct. Cust. 9 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 12, 1913
The board, however, held against these claims, and found that the articles in question were not toys in fact and were not proven to be known commercially as such. In the case of Illfelder v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. … The court feels justified by the record in refusing to disturb that finding of the board. In the case of the Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 102 ; T.
Cited 3 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 4, 2025
In Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United States, 609 F.3d 1323 (Fed. … Group, Inc. v. United States, 289 F.3d 795, 800-01 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Travel Ctr. v. Barram, 236 F.3d 1316, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEstate of Bailey v. Commissioner
79 T.C. 441 · United States Tax Court · Sep 9, 1982
See also Brown v. Elmendorf, 87 Tex. 56 , 26 S.W. 1043, 1044 (1894); Long v. Moore, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 363 , 48 S.W. 43, 46 (1898); cf. Nowlin v. Clary, 178 S.W. 571, 573 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915). … Slay v. Burnett Trust, 187 S.W.2d at 389 ; Langford v. Shamburger, supra at 442 . Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedConsolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. v. The United States
348 F.2d 941 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965
In Zoda v. … Co. v. United States, supra, slip op. p. 9; Lester Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct.Cl. 536, 539 (1960).
Cited 19 timesPublished134 F. Supp. 635 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1955
Goldstein v. United States, Ct.Cl., 130 F.Supp. 330 . Appointment is an executive function, involving the exercise of executive discretion. Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 , 20 S.Ct. 574 , 44 L.Ed. 774 . … United States v. McLean, 95 U.S. 750, 753 , 24 L.Ed. 579 ; Amundson v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 201 , 128 Ct.Cl. 80 ; Coleman v. United States, 100 Ct.Cl. 41 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2014
See Lathan v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 359, 365 (1995). … . § 3.310(b); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished1 Ct. Cust. 36 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 18, 1910
The Board of General Appraisers found as facts: 1. … Muser v. Magone ( 155 U. S., 240 ); United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16 ); United States v. Herman (91 Fed. Rep., 116); United States v. Kenworthy (68 Fed.
Cited 66 timesPublished680 F.2d 151 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 4, 1982
In Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. … III, sec. 2; Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1910). An advisory opinion by the PTO does not fit in either of those categories and we lack the power to review it. Swingline v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMcWilliams Dredging Co. v. United States
118 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950
In the case of Martin Wunderlich v. … The contract does not provide for an appeal on a question of law to this Board.
Cited 7 timesPublished568 F.2d 759 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 29, 1977
The Board Opinion The board, citing Stalego v. … In Cryns v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedJean N. Nicolaou v. Michael Cooperman
438 F.2d 993 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1971
However, despite the board’s reliance on Brand v. … Appellee suggests that the board cited Brand v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBaltimore Contractors, Inc. v. United States
643 F.2d 729 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1981
Since it is impermissible for the court to probe the decisional and thought processes of the Board and its members, see United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 (1941), Montrose Chemical Corp. v. … In United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna