Case law

Wagoner v. Barger

463 F.2d 1377 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 24, 1972

See also Martin v. Johnson, 59 CCPA 769, 454 F.2d 746 172 USPQ 391 (1972). … Neither party sought reconsideration of the board’s decision not to decide that issue, and neither party has briefed the issue or in any way sought to obtain from us a ruling on Wagoner’s motion. Compare Myers v.

In re Dien

680 F.2d 151 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 4, 1982

In Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. … III, sec. 2; Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1910). An advisory opinion by the PTO does not fit in either of those categories and we lack the power to review it. Swingline v.

Application of Paul J. Naquin, Jr

398 F.2d 863 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1968

International Standard Electric Corp. v. Ooms, Com’r, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 157 F.2d 73 (1946). … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 481 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 (1936).

G-C-L

23 I. & N. Dec. 359 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002

Dissenting Opinion: PAULEY, Board Member, joined by FILPPU, Board Member. … V.

M-R-S Manufacturing Co. v. United States

492 F.2d 835 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1974

United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60 (1940); Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389 (1917) ; see Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947); Montilla v. United States, 198 Ct. … Inc. v. United States, supra; Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, supra; Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. United States, supra.

King v. United States

65 Fed. Cl. 385 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2005

Wilkinson v. … Bookman v.

ESPOSITO

21 I. & N. Dec. 1 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1995

O’Brien III, General Attorney BEFORE: Board En Banc: SCHMIDT, Chairman; DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA and HEILMAN, Board Members; HOLMES, Alternate Board Member HEILMAN, Board Member: In a decision dated May 12, 1992, … V 1993).

Hunt & Willett, Inc. v. United States

351 F.2d 980 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

in United States v. … WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1 (1963), 323 F. 2d 874 ; Wingate Constr. Co. v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 131 (1964); Potter v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 28, 37, 38 (1964).

George B. Spero v. Howard J. Ringold and George Rosenkranz

377 F.2d 652 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1967

Exhibit 4, according to the board, amounted to a defective “nunc pro tunc conception.” Heard v. Burton, 333 F.2d 239 , 51 CCPA 1502. … As stated by the United States Supreme Court in Cochrane et al. v.

Chisolm v. United States

49 Fed. Cl. 614 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2001

See Cole v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 1018, 1023 (1992); Craft v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 170, 179 , 544 F.2d 468 (1976). … See Baker v. United States, 127 F.3d 1081, 1087-88 (Fed.Cir.1997) (one member of the board cannot speak for all members of the board).

Gary S. Blatt v. Department of the Army

2014 MSPB 65 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 19, 2014

Hesse v. Department of State, 217 F.3d 1372, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (citing Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530-31 (1988)). … v.

City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public Utilities

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 6, 2015

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, ) ASBCA No. 59877 Board of Public … of City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public Utilities, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

13-11 062

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

See Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App.439, 448 (1995). In making all determinations, the Board must fully consider the lay assertions of record. … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994) (a veteran is competent to report on that of which he or she has personal knowledge).

Brand v. Thomas

96 F.2d 301 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 25, 1938

Cooper v. Downing, 45 App.D.C. 345 ; Lindley v. Shepherd, 58 App.D.C. 31 , 24 F.2d 606 ; Steenstrup v. Morton, 58 App.D.C. 343 , 30 F.2d 867 . … Co. v.

Quality Trust Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 29, 2016

Dixon v. Shinseki, 741F.3d1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citations omitted); see also Avant Assessment, LLC, ASBCA No. 58867, 15-1BCAii36,137 at 176,386. … . 59983, Appeal of Quality Trust Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

SALUTARE, S.A. DE C.V. v. Remedy Drinks Pty Ltd

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 16, 2021

Notwithstanding, the Board has no jurisdiction over non-party depositions or adverse witness depositions taken by subpoena. See Ate My Heart, Inc. v. … See Jain v.

Mary Reese v. Department of the Navy

2025 MSPB 1 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 31, 2025

¶30 In Edwards v. … Young v. Department of Homeland Security, 2024 MSPB 18, ¶ 30; Elder v.

United States v. Coroneos Bros.

9 Ct. Cust. 220 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 25, 1919

We are not prepared to say that the board erred in following Ha-bicht v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 10 ; T. D. 30772). … The board, was of the opinion that this finding brought the case-within United States v. Wallace ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 142 ; T. D. 33413).

S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United States

433 F.2d 1373 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1970

Langenf elder, supra, and Acme Process Equipment Co. v. … If one of them tried to tell a Board what to do in a pending case, he would commit a reprehensible ex parte approach. Camero v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 520 , 375 F.2d 777 (1967).

Claremont Polychemical Corp. v. Atlantic Powdered Metals, Inc.

470 F.2d 636 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 29, 1972

E. g., Hancock v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey, 203 F.2d 737 , 40 CCPA 931 (1953) (CYCLONE and TORNADO, both for fencing); and Beacon-Morris Corp. v. … The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. .