Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

3.42s

  • Mattes v. Commissioner

    77 T.C. 650 · United States Tax Court · Sep 21, 1981

    See, e.g., Commissioner v. … See, e.g., Adler v. Commissioner, 330 F.2d 91 (9th Cir. 1964) (cost of dancing lessons which taxpayer considered therapy for his varicose veins not deductible as medical expenses); Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kyrides v. Bruson

    102 F.2d 416 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1939

    The views of the board respecting this contention have been quoted, supra. In presenting the case before us counsel for Kyrides relies strongly upon the case of Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Church-ward I. … Walker on Patents, § 141a; Hunter v. Stikeman, 13 App.D.C. 214, 226 ; Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App.D.C. 86, 92 ; Lindemeyr v. Hoffman, 18 App.D. *420 C. 1, 5; Roe v. Hanson, 19 App.D.C. 559, 564 .”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Van Raalte v. United States

    7 Ct. Cust. 299 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 2, 1916

    . *300 The protest was tried upon testimony before the Board of General Appraisers and was overruled. The importers now appeal. … Lidenberg v. Eobertson ( 41 Fed., 763 ) ; Loewenthal v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 43 ; T. D. 31592). The decision of the board is therefore affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 729 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1981

    The Board discussed this court’s decision in Bell v. United States, 186 Ct. … The Board also summarized our decisions in Dravo Corp. v. United States 219 Ct. Cl. 416 , 594 F.2d 842 (1979); Singer Co. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 281 , 568 F.2d 695 (1977), and Framlau Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jaffee v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 675 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1929

    That similar principles would apply to the board of directors of a New York corporation when in voluntary dissolution is shown by the following statement from Security Trust Co. v. Pritchard, 201 App. Div. 142 ; 194 N. … Also Liberty Baking Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Knightly v. United States

    227 Ct. Cl. 767 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981

    United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969). We cannot appoint or promote military or civilian personnel. It is not the business of the court to run the Army. Orloff v. … Kingsley v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 549 (1965).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Application of Preformed Line Products Company

    323 F.2d 1007 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1963

    Co., Inc. et al. v. … Kohnstam, Ltd. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Gilmore v. Commissioner

    25 T.C. 1321 · United States Tax Court · Mar 30, 1956

    The board took no action on this offer. … Von Weise v. Commissioner, 69 P. 2d 439 . The Sniders had made a prior offer which specifically included all of the assets of the company. This prior offer was not accepted.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Lee Hoffman v. The United States

    340 F.2d 645 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1964

    Bateson Co. v. … As we stated, in Williams v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States

    20 Ct. Int'l Trade 508 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 19, 1996

    In reaching its conclusion, the CAFC noted that under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … See also NTN Bearing Corp. of Am. v. United States, 19 CIT at 1165, 1173-74, 903 F. Supp. 62, 69 (1995); NTN I, 18 CIT at 1184-85, 881 F. Supp. at 590-91 ; NTN Bearing Corp of Am. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Providence Mill Supply Co. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 5, 1925

    Providence Mill Supply Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3261. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 791 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2264 ; October 5, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 3, 1925 . *2264 1. … Other corporations in the same line of business as the Providence Co. are Brown Brothers Co., the Hope Mill Supply Co., and the United States Oil & Supply Co., all of providence, R.I. DECISION.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Parkhurst

    12 Ct. Cust. 370 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 22, 1924

    The Government contended before the board that the protests were not filed with the collector within 30 days after the original liquidation and that therefore the board had no jurisdiction to review the action of the collector … —Sgobel v. Robertson ( 126 Fed. 677 ); United States v. Phelps (27 Fed. Cases 521-523); Robertson v. Downing ( 127 U. S. 607, 613 ). The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Kelly

    586 F.2d 234 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 9, 1978

    In the similar case of Sze v. Bloch, 458 F.2d 137 , 59 CCPA 983, 173 USPQ 498 (1972), this court stated that the board was not bound by an ex parte determination of the Board of Appeals on a right to make issue. … to this court’s statement in Sze v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lavin v. Pierotti

    129 F.2d 883 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 6, 1942

    In support of his decision, the Primary Examiner cited the cases of Lee et al. v. Vreeland, 49 App.D.C. 200 , 262 F. 654 , and Skinner v. Swartwout, 1922 C.D. 26. … Doherty v. Dubbs, 68 F.2d 373 , 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 807.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United States

    449 F.2d 376 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1971

    Thus, it failed to meet its burden of establishing in what respects the administrative record did not support the findings of the Board. Sundstrand Turbo v. … Snyder-Lynch Motors, Inc. v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Paller v. Principi

    3 Vet. App. 535 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 16, 1992

    See Smith v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 178, 180 (1991), Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). Appellant attempted to reopen her previously adjudicated case on the basis of “new and material evidence.” … This Court understands that there is medical expertise at the Board.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • National Fire Ins. Co. v. United States

    52 F.2d 1011 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

    In Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 144 , 69 Ct. Cl. 158 , and Arthur Curtiss James v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 140 , 69 Ct. … See Bonwit Teller So Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 258 , 51 S. Ct. 395 , 75 L. Ed. 1018 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 14, 1978

    Citing Stix Products, Inc. v. … The Supreme Court, in Beckwith v.

    Cited 149 timesPublished
  • Jaime L. Feliciano v. United States

    114 Fed. Cl. 584 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2014

    In Martinez v. … Chambers v. United States, 417 F.3d 1218, 1224 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1556, 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1990)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Anne M. Kent v. Office of Personnel Management

    2015 MSPB 66 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 31, 2015

    See Davis v. … Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643-44 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.