Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

3.03s

  • Urschel v. Crawford

    73 F.2d 510 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

    Thompson v. Fawick, 20 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 953, 956, 64 F. (2d) 125. … One of our latest expressions is to be found in. the case of Trumbull et al. v. Kirschbraun, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 758, 67 F. (2d) 974.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Strauss

    13 Ct. Cust. 167 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 23, 1925

    In its opinion, the *170 board ruled that it was not proper to receive proof of administrative practice in determining the meaning of the word “toys,” relying upon Illfelder v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 109 . … As to Exhibits 20, 21, and 37, lottoes, the testimony and the evidence of the sample sustain the finding of the board that they are not toys. Under United States v. Field & Co., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 543 , T.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Santa Fe, Inc. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,385 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 30, 1987

    As we stated in Tapper & Associates v. … Maffei Building Wrecking Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 06-00 515

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

    See Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368 (2005); see also Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See also Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 229 (1993); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 324 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Thomas Flores v. Department of Defense

    2014 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 19, 2014

    While this appeal was pending in the regional office, the Board issued decisions in Conyers v. Department of Defense, 115 M.S.P.R. 572 (2010), and Northover v. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 546 (1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilson

    618 F.2d 123 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 31, 1979

    In reviewing actions of a correction board, this court recognizes a strong presumption that the board acted in good faith. Plaintiff has the burden of proving otherwise. Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. … To *854 overturn a decision of the board, plaintiff must show by "cogent and clearly convincing evidence that the Board’s decision was arbitrary, capricious or unlawful.” Dorl v. United States, 200 Ct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 12-34 519

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

    Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 39-40 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Laka Tool & Stamping Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,202 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1984

    See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 194, 197-202, 634 F.2d 557, 560-562 (1980). See also Gindes v. … Of Montana v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 09-11 294

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 6, 2011

    Thus, the Board can proceed with this claim without prejudice to the Veteran. See Sutton v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 553 (1996); Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Whelan v. United States

    34 Cust. Ct. 208 · United States Customs Court · Jun 2, 1955

    United States v. Gardel Industries, 33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 118, C. A. D. 325; Yardley & Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, 41 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 85, C. A. D. 533; Joseph E. Seagram cfe Sons, Inc. v. … Granted its properties differ in certain essentials from those of other paper or pulpboards, as noted so clearly in the case of Masonite Corporation v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Krusi v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 168 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1911

    To hold otherwise would make the board the final judge in many cases of contested classification and would in effect deprive-the importer of the right of appeal'conceded by Congress. … United States v. Strauss (136 Fed. Rep., 185). The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Beer v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 484 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 17, 1911

    In Passavant v. United States ( 148 U. … The case of Muser v. Magone ( 155 U. S., 240 ) is equally if not more applicable. That case involved the appraisement of similar merchandise als'o imported from St. Gall.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Application of Shao Wen Yuan

    188 F.2d 377 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1951

    Robinson on Patents, 1890 Edition, Vol. 1, page 230, citing the Cochrane v. … Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Mary E. Verbeck v. United States

    111 Fed. Cl. 744 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 23, 2013

    v. … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983); see also Smith v. Dalton, 927 F.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. United States

    114 Fed. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2014

    See Williams v. United States, 100 Fed. … See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Irwin & Leighton v. United States

    115 Ct. Cl. 18 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1949

    the National War Labor Board.” … Plaintiffs next contend that in any event they are entitled to recover on the ground of misrepresentation, citing the concurring opinion in the Sunswick case and our decision in Albert & Harrison, Inc., v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stringham v. Commissioner

    12 T.C. 580 · United States Tax Court · Apr 15, 1949

    Keever Stringham, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Stringham v. Commissioner Docket No. 17101 United States Tax Court 12 T.C. 580 ; 1949 U.S. Tax Ct. … Cohan v.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Weise

    650 F.2d 290 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1980

    Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. Cl. 285 , 599 F. 2d 984 (1979). In that, and the companion case, Adams v. United States, Ct. Cl. … See also Dilley v. Alexander, 603 F. 2d 914 (1979), rev’g 440 F. Supp. 375 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Status of National Veterans Business Development Corporation

    Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Mar 19, 2004

    Soc’y v. Am. Nat’l Red Cross, 640 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir. 1981) (analyzing Red Cross, a majority of whose board members are not appointed by the government); cf. Pearl v. … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. United States

    124 Ct. Cl. 655 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

    See Baxter v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 632 ; Borak v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 236,245 ; Borak v. Biddle, 147 F. 2d 278, 281 . … Green v. United States, No. 48991, 124 C.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.