Case law

ROLDAN

22 I. & N. Dec. 512 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

The federal courts have affirmed the Board’s appli- cation of a federal standard in construing state charges. Paredes- Urrestarazu v. United States INS, 36 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 1994); Yanez-Popp v. … As the Board stated in Matter of Dillingham, 21 I&N Dec. 1001 (BIA 1997), Prior to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Garberding v.

Bruno New York Industries Corp. v. The United States

342 F.2d 75 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1965

Gothwaite v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 400 (1944); J. F. Barbour & Sons v. United States, 104 Ct.Cl. 360 (1945); Pearson, Dickerson, Inc., et al. v. United States, 115 Ct.Cl. 236, 261-262 (1950); Barnes v. … Deming v. United States, 1 Ct.Cl. 190 ; Jones v. United States, 1 Ct.Cl. 383 ; Wilson v. United States, 11 Ct.Cl. 513 ; Horowitz v. United States, 58 Ct.Cl. 189 .” 1 .

Godbee

222 Ct. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1980

All of the serious arguments raised by the parties in this case were disposed of favorably to plaintiffs by our decision in Doyle v. United States and Adams v. United States (considered in the same opinion), 220 Ct. … See the order of the court in Eddy v. United States, post at 650.

SolarWindow Technologies, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 5, 2021

Inc. v. Ultraphonics of N. Am. Inc., 52 USPQ2d 1300, 1302 (TTAB 1999) (citing Williams v. … See B & B Hardware, Inc. v.

Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc.

534 F.2d 915 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 13, 1976

, Wincharger Corp. v. … See the board’s opinion in Martin v. Crown Zellerbach, supra, 153 USPQ 141 , 145 (TTAB 1967). The issue of whether a portion of a mark is dominant turns on the facts of each case.

Christopher L. Elder v. Department of the Air Force

2016 MSPB 41 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 22, 2016

Chavez v. … Runstrom v.

King v. United States

50 Fed. Cl. 701 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2001

Small v. United States Defendant asserts that the procedures of the selection boards in this case are essentially the same as those endorsed by the Federal Circuit in Small v. … In Curtis v.

Pettit v. Commissioner

61 T.C. 634 · United States Tax Court · Feb 7, 1974

Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34, 41 (1937). … Commissioner v. Duberstein, supra at 286 .

In re Wagenhorst

64 F.2d 780 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 24, 1933

In Mas v. Root, 54 F.(2d) 435, 436 , 19 C. C. P. … In Derby Oil Co. v. White Star Refining Co., 62 F.(3d) 984, 20 C. C. P.

Hicks Corp. v. United States

487 F.2d 520 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1973

Finally, the Board record pertaining to Navy Contract No. 63-0376-f (Count V), 67-1 BCA ¶6304 , included a letter of May 20, 1965, from plaintiff’s president to the Navy in which he undertook to outline the background of … In sum, there was more than substantial record support for the Board’s conclusion that a fresh infusion of Government credit would have been plaintiff’s only salvation. Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct.

Eastman Gardiner Naval Stores Co. v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 242 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1926

Alexander v. Pendleton, 8 Cranch, 462, 470 ; Young v. Mackall, 4 Maryland, 367 ; Wood on Limitations, 293, and cases cited. See also an extensive discussion of this subject by Mr. Justice White in Union Pacifie Ry. … Co. v. Wyler, 158 U. S. 285, 296-298 . There is a duty in the Board, imposed by statute, to hear and determine proceedings regularly and properly brought before it.

Land v. Dreyer

155 F.2d 383 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1946

See Broadwell v. Long, supra. On December 1, 1942, the period for taking testimony in chief by appellant expired. … See Townsend v. Smith, 36 F.2d 292 , 17 C.C.P.A., Patents, 647; Rowe v. Holtz, 55 F.2d 468 , 19 C.C.P.A., Patents, 970, and authorities therein cited; Curtis et al. v. Land, 129 F.2d 549 , 29 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1118.

Horace Day Co. v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 152 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 17, 1912

United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16 ). The determination of the appraisement board as to what place in the country of exportation is the principal market is final. Stair v. Peaslee ( 59 U. S., 521 ). … Hilton v. Merritt ( 110 U. S., 97 ); Auffmordt v. Hedden ( 137 U. S., 310 ); United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16 ); Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Babcock ( 204 U. S., 585 ); Wolff v. United States, supra.

09-24 533

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

. § 3.304(f) (2015); see also Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997). … See Collette v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

William F. Niedernhofer v. The United States

426 F.2d 1403 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970

Defendant cites Miller v. … Grubin v. United States, 333 F.2d 861 , 166 Ct.Cl. 272 (1964); Hoppock v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 87 (1963); Patterson v.

Bobby R. Jones v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 247 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 19, 2008

See Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241, 249 (1991); see also Fagre v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 188, 190 (2008). … Rosier, supra; see Linville v.

Blake Construction Co. v. United States

597 F.2d 1357 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1979

An issue as to the meaning of language in a contract is for this court to decide independently, as no finality is attached to a conclusion of law reached by the board. Allied Paint Mfg. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 1339, 1361-62 , 364 F.2d 439, 453 (1966), quoting Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 75, 84 (1960).

FFR Building Specialties Corp. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,999 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 30, 1981

We must consider a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, reported as FFR Building Specialties Corp. v. United States Army, ASBCA No. 23187 , 80-1 BCA ¶ 14,326 (1980). … Guyler Co. v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 403 , 593 F.2d 406 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 (1979); S.O.G. of Arkansas v. United States, 212 Ct. *540 Cl. 125 , 546 F.2d 367 (1976); Wickham Contracting Co. v.

Kellus v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 538 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1987

See also Dunn v. … Qualls v. United States, supra.

Fulmer v. United States

77 F. Supp. 927 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1948

Yassin v. United States, Ct.CL, 76 F.Supp. 509 . … See Filor v. United States, 9 Wall. 45 , 19 L.Ed. 549 ; Willie Crockett Wright, Adm’r. v. United States, 86 Ct.Cl. 290 ; Burke and Herbert Bank and Trust Co., Administrator, et al. v.