Case law

Parker v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 522 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 18, 1991

Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 404 (1991) (quoting Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56, 58, 56-57 (1990)). … Moore , at 405; Witherspoon v.

Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United States

580 F.2d 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

In Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … In Priebe & Sons, Inc. v.

Miller v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 201 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 22, 1992

Ashmore, 1 Vet.App. at 583 ; see also Colvin, 1 Vet.App. at 171 (the Board must assess the credibility of testimony and articulate its findings); Ohland v. … Kehoskie v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 31, 34 (1991) (where a claim should not have been reopened, if the Board nevertheless denied the claim, such error would be considered harmless); Godwin v.

United States v. Rolls-Royce of America (Inc.)

13 Ct. Cust. 259 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 21, 1925

This was the conclusion reached in McKesson & Robbins v. … In United States v. Robinson & Co., 12 Ct. Cust.

Stern Bros. v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 405 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

In many respects it is not dissimilar to the case of Bradley Martin v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 134 ; T. … More properly in point is the decision of United States v. Hermann (154 Fed.

Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. United States

423 F.2d 300 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

This contract language came before us for interpretation three years ago in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 97 , 374 F.2d 516 (1967). … Defendant refers, properly we think, to Thorpe v. Housing Authority, 393 U.S. 268 , 89 S.Ct. 518 , 21 L.Ed.2d 474 (1969), as being in agreement with our position.

A-A-F-V

29 I. & N. Dec. 118 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jun 6, 2025

Turkson v. … See Kerr v.

Koby v. Commissioner

14 T.C. 1103 · United States Tax Court · Jun 7, 1950

See Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 . … In William Hardy, Inc. v.

Sexton v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1981

The failure was that the board had selected an insufficient percentage of officers from the "secondary zone” of promotion (officers junior in rank to those in the "primary zone”), see Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. … The plaintiff sought review of these passovers from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but that board denied relief.

R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States

428 F.2d 1304 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

In Ithaca Gun Co. v. … Co. v.

Red Bobtail Transportation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 11, 2024

A motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction presents a threshold challenge to the Board’s jurisdiction while a merits challenge has res judicata effect. See Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. … Booth v. United States, 990 F.2d 617, 620-21 (Fed.

Johnson & Johnson v. Stryker Corporation

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 5, 2013

See Giant Food, Inc. v. Standard Terry Mills, Inc., 229 USPQ 955, 963 (TTAB 1986). … Inc. v.

N G v. United States

94 Fed. Cl. 375 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2010

Plaintiff must overcome the presumption of regularity that attaches to the actions of the correction board. See Richey v. … Defendant cites Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir. 1986); Stewart v. United States, 197 Ct.Cl. 472, 484 (1972); Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 319 (1991); and Krzeminski v.

Empresa Cubana del Tabaco d.b.a. Cubatabaco v. Kretek International, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 14, 2024

Citations to the Board record refer to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., Conc. Use No. 94002505, 2014 TTAB LEXIS 17, at *6 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

10-19 598

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 207-08 (1994). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995).

Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. The United States

422 F.2d 1344 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

Williamsburg Drapery Co. v. United States, 369 F.2d 729, 733 , 177 Ct.Cl. 776, 783 (1966). … The Board properly relied upon trade practice in the interpretation of the contract drawings, and its ruling was reasonable and correct as a matter of law. Gholson, Byars & Holmes Const. Co. v.

GRINBERG

20 I. & N. Dec. 911 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1994

United States v. … Accardi v.

Capital Airlines, Inc. v. United States

90 F. Supp. 926 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 171 Fed. (2d) 339; Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 336 U. S. 601, 604, 605 . … United States v. Jones, Receiver, supra, pp. 669, 670.

SUSMA

22 I. & N. Dec. 947 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

Members FILPPU, Board Member: ORDER: PER CURIAM. … See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995). As the respondent did not file his motion within 90 days of the final administrative decision, it will be denied as untimely.

John Sherman Smith v. Charles Emory Wehn

318 F.2d 325 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1963

Tracy v. Leslie, 14 App.D.C. 126 , 87 O.G. 891 ; Podlesak v. … In Segall v.