Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.56s

  • Kaeserman

    207 Ct. Cl. 983 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1975

    Assuming the Board to be unwilling to exercise its discretion favorably in the premises, there is no way this court can constructively and retroactively order active duty or promotions in rank. Abruzzo v. … Merson v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 92, 97-98 (1965). “The 1973 order in this case anticipated Testan v. United States, 205 Ct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mamie L. Gordon v. Anthony J. Principi

    17 Vet. App. 221 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 8, 2003

    Supreme Court's decisions in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), and Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), (1)(B), (2)(B); Scarborough v. Principi, 319 F.3d 1346, 1349-55 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Bazalo v. West, 150 F.3d 1380, 1383-84 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Cullens v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Robert E. Williams v. The United States

    405 F.2d 890 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1969

    Stephens v. United States, 358 F.2d 951 , 174 Ct.Cl. 365 (1966); Wesolowski v. United States, 174 Ct.Cl. 682 (1966); Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct.Cl. 557 (1961). … Johnson v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 648 , 138 Ct.Cl. 81 , cert. denied 355 U.S. 850 , 78 S.Ct. 69 , 2 L.Ed.2d 54 (1957) and cases cited therein.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • 10-40 642

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2014

    As the issue of reopening is jurisdictional, the Board, in the first instance, must rule on the matter of reopening. Jackson v. Principi, 265 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380 (Fed. … The Board also notes that the Appellant has not raised a claim of CUE in a final rating decision, pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a). See Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 40 (1993) and Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 07-09 529

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

    DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995). … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • General Electric Company, a Corporation v. The United States

    412 F.2d 1215 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1969

    See Biddle v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 87, 104 (1968); Holman v. United States, 383 F.2d 411 , 181 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967); Harrington v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 432 (1963). … E. g., New York Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States, 385 F.2d 427 , 180 Ct.Cl. 446 (1967) (and cases cited); John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 698 , 132 Ct.Cl. 645 (1955).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rey-Bellet v. Engelhardt

    493 F.2d 1380 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 4, 1974

    See, e. g., Campbell v. Wettstein, supra; Blicke v. Treves, supra; In re Hitchings, 342 F.2d 80 , 52 CCPA 1141 (1965); In re Krimmel, 292 F.2d 948 , 48 CCPA 1116 (1961); and Archer v. … Schindler, citing Alpert v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United States

    580 F.2d 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

    In Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … In Priebe & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Hrh Construction Corporation v. The United States

    428 F.2d 1267 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

    Paschen Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 418 F.2d 1360 , 190 Ct.Cl. 177 (1969); N. Fiorito Co. v. United States, 416 F.2d 1284 , 189 Ct.Cl. 215 (1969); Hol-Gar Mfg. Corp. v. … Co. v. United States, supra; Unieon Management Corp. v. United States, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • ORTEGA-CABRERA

    23 I. & N. Dec. 793 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2005

    Frost, Esquire, Los Angeles, California BEFORE: Board Panel: OSUNA, Acting Vice Chairman; HURWITZ and PAULEY, Board Members. … See, e.g., Household Credit Services, Inc. v. Pfennig, 541 U.S. 232 (2004); K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281 (1988).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • US Pan American Solutions, LLC

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 13, 2024

    DECISION Appellant bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the Board possesses jurisdiction to hear its appeal. See Reynolds v. … Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F.3d 1573, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1996); see Mansoor Int’l Dev.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Darryl D. Bradford v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 20, 2006

    In Patton v. … The Board must also address all issues that are reasonably raised by the appellant. EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); see also Jones v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 396, 399 (1992). Once Mr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 522 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 18, 1991

    Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 404 (1991) (quoting Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56, 58, 56-57 (1990)). … Moore , at 405; Witherspoon v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Gary S. Blatt v. Department of the Army

    2014 MSPB 65 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 19, 2014

    Hesse v. Department of State, 217 F.3d 1372, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (citing Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530-31 (1988)). … v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 588 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 25, 1985

    Co. v. … See United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1367 (Fed.Cir.1983); Harris Systems Internat’l, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 253, 260-62 (1984). See also Golden Eagle Refining Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Sexton v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1981

    The failure was that the board had selected an insufficient percentage of officers from the "secondary zone” of promotion (officers junior in rank to those in the "primary zone”), see Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. … The plaintiff sought review of these passovers from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but that board denied relief.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States

    428 F.2d 1304 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

    In Ithaca Gun Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Laka Tool & Stamping Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,202 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1984

    See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 194, 197-202, 634 F.2d 557, 560-562 (1980). See also Gindes v. … Of Montana v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Designatronics, Inc.

    25 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,404 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1978

    V 1975), to claim the SCCA exemption in de novo proceedings before this court without regard to any waiver before the Board. … Co. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 460 , 527 F. 2d 280 (1978); Gibraltar Mfg. Co. v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 226 , 546 F. 2d 386 (1976); Lykes Bros. S.S. Co. v. United States, 198 Ct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 06-00 515

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

    See Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368 (2005); see also Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See also Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 229 (1993); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 324 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.