Case law

Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United States

580 F.2d 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

In Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … In Priebe & Sons, Inc. v.

Hrh Construction Corporation v. The United States

428 F.2d 1267 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

Paschen Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 418 F.2d 1360 , 190 Ct.Cl. 177 (1969); N. Fiorito Co. v. United States, 416 F.2d 1284 , 189 Ct.Cl. 215 (1969); Hol-Gar Mfg. Corp. v. … Co. v. United States, supra; Unieon Management Corp. v. United States, supra.

US Pan American Solutions, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 13, 2024

DECISION Appellant bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the Board possesses jurisdiction to hear its appeal. See Reynolds v. … Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F.3d 1573, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1996); see Mansoor Int’l Dev.

Darryl D. Bradford v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 20, 2006

In Patton v. … The Board must also address all issues that are reasonably raised by the appellant. EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); see also Jones v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 396, 399 (1992). Once Mr.

Franchi Construction Co. v. United States

609 F.2d 984 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1979

WPC Enterprises Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1, 6-7 , 323 F.2d 874, 876-77 (1963). … Merando, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 23, 26-27 , 475 F.2d 601, 602-03 (1973); Bishop Eng’r Co. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 411, 415 (1967); Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.

Parker v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 522 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 18, 1991

Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 404 (1991) (quoting Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56, 58, 56-57 (1990)). … Moore , at 405; Witherspoon v.

Corey Stoglin v. Department of Agriculture

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 31, 2023

See Irwin, 498 U.S. at 96 n.3; Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 110 M.S.P.R. 381, ¶ 14 (2009). … See Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643-44 (Fed.

Rowe v. Holtz

55 F.2d 465 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1932

This practice, however, ■was overruled by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in Peters v. Hopkins and Demend, 1910 C. D., 278 * * *. The board then quotes from Peters v. Hopkins, 34 App. D. … C. 141, and discusses and quotes from Mergenthaler v. Scudder, 11 App. D. C. 264; De Forest v. Meissner et al., 298 Fed. 1006 ; and Armstrong et al. v.

Gary S. Blatt v. Department of the Army

2014 MSPB 65 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 19, 2014

Hesse v. Department of State, 217 F.3d 1372, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (citing Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530-31 (1988)). … v.

DCX-CHOL Enterprises, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 15, 2017

SPM4A4-11-V-4143 ) SPM4A6-11-C-008 l ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. … Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60782, Appeal ofDCX-CHOL Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Proscelle v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 629 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 24, 1992

Manio v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 140, 145-46 (1991); Jones (McArthur) v. … Once the record has been adequately developed, the Board, after considering all the evidence of record, should adjudicate or readjudicate each of the veteran’s claims. See Carl Fletcher v.

Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States

8 Cl. Ct. 588 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 25, 1985

Co. v. … See United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1367 (Fed.Cir.1983); Harris Systems Internat’l, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 253, 260-62 (1984). See also Golden Eagle Refining Co. v.

Sexton v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1981

The failure was that the board had selected an insufficient percentage of officers from the "secondary zone” of promotion (officers junior in rank to those in the "primary zone”), see Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. … The plaintiff sought review of these passovers from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but that board denied relief.

R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States

428 F.2d 1304 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

In Ithaca Gun Co. v. … Co. v.

Laka Tool & Stamping Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,202 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1984

See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 194, 197-202, 634 F.2d 557, 560-562 (1980). See also Gindes v. … Of Montana v.

06-00 515

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

See Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368 (2005); see also Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See also Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994); Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 229 (1993); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 324 (1991).

Empresa Cubana del Tabaco d.b.a. Cubatabaco v. Kretek International, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 14, 2024

Citations to the Board record refer to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., Conc. Use No. 94002505, 2014 TTAB LEXIS 17, at *6 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

United States v. Schumacher

3 Ct. Cust. 301 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 27, 1912

The following reported decisions are cited by the Government in support of this claim: McGibbon & Co. v. United States (T. D. 17638), McGibbon & Co. v. United States (107 Fed. Rep., 265), United States v. … Rep., 1021), Sloane v. United States (T. D. 25037), McGibbon & Co. v. United States (T. D. 25197), Robinson v. United States (T. D. 26149), and Stroheim & Romann v. United States (T. D. 26447).

American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United States

499 F.2d 552 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

Questions of law are for the court to decide independently of the board’s conclusions thereon which have no finality. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, supra, ante at 65, 493 F. 2d at 1361 ; John McShain, Inc. v. … Co. v. United States, 192 Ct.

Thomas Flores v. Department of Defense

2014 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 19, 2014

While this appeal was pending in the regional office, the Board issued decisions in Conyers v. Department of Defense, 115 M.S.P.R. 572 (2010), and Northover v. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 546 (1985).