Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.89s

  • LOZADA

    19 I. & N. Dec. 637 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1988

    Magallanes-Damian v. INS, 783 F.2d 931 (9th Cir. 1986); Paul v. INS, 521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir- 1975). … Ramirez-Durazo v. INS, 794 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1986); Lopez v. INS, 775 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1985); see also Magallanes-Damian v.

    Disagreed with by Ozoa v. Holder, 356 F. App'x 63 (2009)Cited 1,879 timesPublished
  • Salutare S.A. de C.V. v. Remedy Drinks Pty Ltd

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 16, 2021

    Notwithstanding, the Board has no jurisdiction over non-party depositions or adverse witness depositions taken by subpoena. See Ate My Heart, Inc. v. … See Jain v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Structural Finishing, Inc. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,456 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1988

    Link v. Wabash R.R. … See also Rowe v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 802 F.2d 434 (Fed.Cir.1986); Whitaker v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 784 F.2d 1109, 1110 (Fed.Cir.1986); Massingale v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wing Yee Chong & Co. v. United States

    11 Ct. Cust. 329 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 26, 1922

    D. 14047, affirmed Kwong Ching Chong v. United States ( 119 Fed. 383 ); protest of Tuck, High & Co., T. D. 14411; protest Chee Ho Tong, T. D. 24675; protest Joe Kee, T. D. 25218; G. A. 1030; protest Choy Chong Wo, T. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brand v. Thomas

    96 F.2d 301 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 25, 1938

    Cooper v. Downing, 45 App.D.C. 345 ; Lindley v. Shepherd, 58 App.D.C. 31 , 24 F.2d 606 ; Steenstrup v. Morton, 58 App.D.C. 343 , 30 F.2d 867 . … Co. v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Name Redacted

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Dec 2, 2016

    The appeal is dismissed with prejudice -:V /_ Dated: 2 December 2016 MARK N. … GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • T. W. Warner Co. v. United States

    15 F. Supp. 160 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1936

    In the case of Tait v. … It may be that if the Board of Tax Appeals had had the decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stirn v. United States

    12 Ct. Cust. 42 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 19, 1924

    It is claimed by counsel for both sides that the material facts here are substantially the same as those in Stirn & Co. v. United States ( 10 Ct. Cust. Appls. 17 ; T. D. 38257). … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Marshall Field & Co. v. United States

    45 C.C.P.A. 72 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1958

    D. 30048) where the Board of General Appraisers had held pincushions of cotton and sawdust which were “crude and highly colored imitations of apples, peaches, pears, and like fruit” were not artificial fruit because they … D. 43820; United States v. H. A. Caesar & Co., 18 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 106, T. D. 44067; California Fruit Wrapping Mills (Inc.) v. United States, 19 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 381, 385; Hummel Chemical Co. v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • King v. United States

    65 Fed. Cl. 385 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2005

    Wilkinson v. … Bookman v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wisconsin Cheese Group, LLC v. Comercializadora de Lácteos y Derivados, S.A. de C.V.

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2016

    Consolidation is discretionary with the Board, and may be ordered upon motion granted by the Board, or upon stipulation of the parties approved by the Board, or upon the Board’s own initiative. World Hockey Ass’n v. … Johnson & Johnson v. Stryker, 109 USPQ2d at 1078-79 (citing Drive Trademark Holdings LP v. Inofin, 83 USPQ2d 1433, 1435 (TTAB 2007)); Giant Food, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosenberg v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 618 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 17, 1935

    On January 25, 1935, the Clerk of the Board received through the mail and filed as No. 78410, a petition captioned “ I. J. Rosenberg, Transferee, Bankers Security Co., Transferor, Petitioner, v. … Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hunt & Willett, Inc. v. United States

    351 F.2d 980 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

    in United States v. … WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1 (1963), 323 F. 2d 874 ; Wingate Constr. Co. v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 131 (1964); Potter v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 28, 37, 38 (1964).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Hadden v. United States

    130 F. Supp. 610 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

    Ketchum v. St. Louis County, 101 U.S. 306 , 25 L.Ed. 999 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 , 17 S.Ct. 453 , 41 L.Ed. 865 ; United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 267 U.S. 387 , 45 S.Ct. 338 , 69 L.Ed. 672 . … Adler v. Fenton, 24 How. 407 , 16 L.Ed. 696 ; Duell v. Brewer, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Frank v. Hollerith

    159 F.2d 774 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 11, 1947

    Wheeler, Hoover, and Dirkes v. Kleinschmidt and Colman, 32 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 975, 994, 149 F. (2d) 161, 65 USPQ 407 . … We agree with the holding of the board that this position is untenable, upon the facts of this case, and we agree that the ruling in the case of Kreidel v. Parker, 25 C. C. P. A.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • N G v. United States

    94 Fed. Cl. 375 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2010

    Plaintiff must overcome the presumption of regularity that attaches to the actions of the correction board. See Richey v. … Defendant cites Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir. 1986); Stewart v. United States, 197 Ct.Cl. 472, 484 (1972); Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 319 (1991); and Krzeminski v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Life Insurance Co. of Georgia v. United States

    650 F.2d 250 · United States Court of Claims · May 20, 1981

    To the extent the decision of Bankers Union was based on the possibility of prepayment of the loans (which terminates the earning of interest on the principal), we believe Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. … Brown v. Helvering dealt with overriding insurance commissions; the Supreme Court stated: The overriding commissions were gross income of the year in which they were receivable.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robin Sabio v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2017 MSPB 4 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017

    See Panter v. … Oncale v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Juliana De Guzman v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 526 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 14, 2006

    See Silverman v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 487 (1995) (per curiam order). … Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456, 1456 (Fed.Cir.1993), aff'd, 513 U.S. 115 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994); 2A N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • A-F

    8 I. & N. Dec. 429 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1959

    In Ebru,vaxdim v. … (Emphasis by the Board.)

    Cited 53 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.