Case law

13-09 499

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995). According to Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed. … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

OKOH

20 I. & N. Dec. 864 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1994

See Castaneda v. INS, 23 F.3d 1576, 1581 (10th Cir. 1994); Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 89-90 (2d Cir. 1993); Joehar v. INS, 957 F.2d 887, 889-90 (D.C. Cir. 1992); Saadi v. … INS, 990 F.2d 772 (3d Cir. 1993); Juarez v. INS, 732 F.211 58, 59 60- (6th Cir. 1984); Mendez v.

Brogden v. Slater

40 F.2d 988 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1930

Seymour v. Molyneux, 49 App. D. C. 216, 263 F. 468 . … Gowen v. Hendry & King (Cust. & Pat. App.) 37 F.(2d) 426 ; Lynch v. Headley et al., 52 App. I). C. 269, 285 F. 1003 . Appellant asserts, however, that this rule is not applicable here.

Patel v. Comm'r

138 T.C. 395 · United States Tax Court · Jun 27, 2012

Coal Co. v. Eagle Land Co., 93 S.E.2d 231 (W.Va. 1956); Premonstratensian Fathers v. Badger Mut. Ins. Co., 175 N.W.2d 237 (Wis. 1970); Wyo. State Farm Loan Board v. FCSCC, 759 P.2d 1230 (Wyo. 1988). … Stewart, 221 S.W. 31 (Mo. 1920); Johnson v. Skillman, 12 N.W. 149 (Minn. 1882); Herigstad v. Hardrock Oil Co., 52 P.2d 171 (Mont. 1935); Brown Cnty. Agric. Soc’y, Inc. v. Brown Cnty.

Darryl D. Bradford v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 20, 2006

In Patton v. … The Board must also address all issues that are reasonably raised by the appellant. EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); see also Jones v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 396, 399 (1992). Once Mr.

Thorndike v. United States

72 Fed. Cl. 580 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2006

III 1997))); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“The Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over ... claims for [declaratory or injunctive] equitable relief.”); see also Johnson v. … Mot. for Recons, at 2-3 (citing Rice; Brown; and Betz v. United States, 40 Fed.Cl. 286 (1998)).

Miller v. United States

29 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 1993

In Blevins v. … See also Mullen v.

Parker v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 522 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 18, 1991

Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 404 (1991) (quoting Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56, 58, 56-57 (1990)). … Moore , at 405; Witherspoon v.

Kinsman Corthell v. Department of Homeland Security

2016 MSPB 23 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 7, 2016

Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643-44 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Agoranos v.

Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United States

580 F.2d 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

In Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … In Priebe & Sons, Inc. v.

Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. Reynolds

242 F.2d 761 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 29, 1957

In Snider v. … In Davis v.

200426-81405

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2021

See Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310 (b). … See Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Van Raalte v. United States

7 Ct. Cust. 299 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 2, 1916

. *300 The protest was tried upon testimony before the Board of General Appraisers and was overruled. The importers now appeal. … Lidenberg v. Eobertson ( 41 Fed., 763 ) ; Loewenthal v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 43 ; T. D. 31592). The decision of the board is therefore affirmed.

Sexton v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1981

The failure was that the board had selected an insufficient percentage of officers from the "secondary zone” of promotion (officers junior in rank to those in the "primary zone”), see Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. … The plaintiff sought review of these passovers from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but that board denied relief.

R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States

428 F.2d 1304 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

In Ithaca Gun Co. v. … Co. v.

Shiepe v. United States

36 F. Supp. 2d 402 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 4, 1999

Brown, Agency Exh. 27/2-27/3, at C.R. 1143-44; Decision and Order of the Administrative Law Judge, at C.R. 57. … See Timken Co. v. United States, 11 CIT 786, 805-06, 673 F. Supp. 495, 514 (1987) (citing Cabais v. Egger, 690 F.2d 234, 238 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (quoting Gibson Wine Co. v. Snyder, 194 F.2d 329, 331 (D.C.

N G v. United States

94 Fed. Cl. 375 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2010

Plaintiff must overcome the presumption of regularity that attaches to the actions of the correction board. See Richey v. … Defendant cites Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir. 1986); Stewart v. United States, 197 Ct.Cl. 472, 484 (1972); Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 319 (1991); and Krzeminski v.

Empresa Cubana del Tabaco d.b.a. Cubatabaco v. Kretek International, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 14, 2024

Citations to the Board record refer to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., Conc. Use No. 94002505, 2014 TTAB LEXIS 17, at *6 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

In re Anderson

471 F.2d 1237 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 26, 1973

As was stated in American Anode, Inc. v. … Smith v. Snow, 294 U.S. 1 [at pages 11 et seq.] 55 S.Ct. 279 , 79 L.Ed. 721 . * * *. We consider the board’s first reason insufficient. On the “how to use” point we simply disagree with the board.

10-19 598

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 207-08 (1994). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995).