Case law

Old Swiss House, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

569 F.2d 1130 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 16, 1978

Compare De Sylva v. Ballen-tine, 351 U.S. 570 , 76 S.Ct. 974 , 100 L.Ed. 1415 (1956), with United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co., 412 U.S. 580 , 93 S.Ct. 2389 , 37 L.Ed.2d 187 (1973). … Payne v.

Felicia A. Bills v. Department of the Air Force

2015 MSPB 2 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 27, 2015

The administrative judge’s authority for these requirements was based on Shobert v. … See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Thompson Ramo Wooldridge Inc. v. The United States

361 F.2d 222 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

See, e. g., Hollerbach v. … Co. v. United States, supra, 297 F.2d at 541-542 , 155 Ct.Cl. at 657-659 . 21 . It is true that the Board also stated that “some of the film produced excellent prints.”

Lewisohn Importing & Trading Co. v. United States

5 Ct. Cust. 204 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1914

The Court of Customs Appeals in Wolff v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 181 ; T. D. 31217), affirming ruling of the board in G. A. 6888 (T. … United States v. Spingarn Bros. (5 Ct. Cust. Appls., —; T. D. 34002); Arthur v. Goddard ( 96 U. S., 145 ).

Bannercraft Clothing Co. v. United States

518 F.2d 605 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1975

Manufacturers Service Co., Inc. v. United States, supra, and O'Brien Gear & Machine Co. v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 1014 (1972). … This is the exact argument we rejected in Sandnes’ Sons, Inc. v.

07-38 285

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995) (en banc). … Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361, 363 (1993).

10-22 216

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 29, 2015

Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007); Hayes v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 67 (1996). Adequacy means that the Board can perform an informed readjudication. Barr, 21 Vet. App. at 303. … Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 120 (2007); Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405 (1994).

Satrum v. Commissioner

62 T.C. 413 · United States Tax Court · Jun 27, 1974

to complete; (2) feeding of chickens, requiring one employee on an electric feeder 40'minutes; (3) removal of chicken droppings, requiring 30 minutes and one employee with a forklift-type machine which scrapes dropping boards … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 1283 (W.D. Ky. 1973) (tobacco sheds), affirmed per curiam 491 F. 2d 1258 (C.A. 6, 1974); Robert E.

Dyer v. Commissioner

71 T.C. 560 · United States Tax Court · Jan 15, 1979

Law sec. 2554(16) (McKinney 1970); Edwards v. Board of Education of City of New York, 32 App. Div. 2d 690 (3d Dept. 1969), 299 N.Y.S.2d 991 (1969). … Stone v. Gross, 25 App. Div. 2d 753 (2d Dept. 1966), 269 N.Y.S.2d 81 , affd. 19 N.Y.2d 675 , 225 N.E.2d 558 , 278 N.Y.S.2d 867 (1967). See also Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Lockport v.

Ross v. United States

75 F. Supp. 725 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1948

The decision of the Board and its affirmation by the Circuit Court of Appeals were clearly correct under the law as it stood at that time. Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U. S. 212 , and City Bank Co. v. Helvering, 313 U. … United States v. Borden Co., 308 U. S. 188 .

John Doe v. Department of Justice

2015 MSPB 65 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 21, 2015

Stephen v. … Summary judgment, however, is not available in Board proceedings. Crispin v. Department of Commerce, 732 F.2d 919, 922 (Fed. Cir. 1984); see Savage v.

Fisher v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 406 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 15, 1992

. § 7104 (d)(1) (formerly § 4004(d)(1)) that the Board provide a written statement of reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions. See Smith v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 137, 141 (1992); Willis v. … We therefore remand the case to the Board with instructions to comply with 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1). See Sammarco v. Derwin-ski, 1 Vet.App. 111, 113-14 (1991).

12-12 191

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

See Wagner v. Principi, 370 F.3d 1089, 1096 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Jensen v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1413, 1417 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … App. 398 (1995); Traut v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 495 (1994); Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 171 (1991).

Ryan Co. v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 1999

When responsiveness is an issue, it must be resolved before the board can proceed. If a bid is not responsive, the protester has no more right to invoke the office of the board than the proverbial man on the street. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 730 (Fed.Cir.1997); Dalton v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 98 F.3d 1298, 1305 (Fed.Cir. 1996); Gould, Inc. v.

Strauss & Co. v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 203 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 12, 1911

Fensterer v. Ruhe (T. D. 31110). … United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos y Compañia ( 209 U. S., 337 -339); United States v. Falk & Bro. ( 204 U. S., 143 -152); Komada & Co. v. United States ( 215 U. S., 392 -397).

Bredehorst v. United States

677 F.2d 87 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1982

of Appeals and Review (board). … Harrington v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1110, 1117 (1966), quoting Guiness v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , cert. denied, 363 U.S. 819 (1960). See also Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.

Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. United States

135 F. Supp. 946 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1955

Plaintiff’s petition characterizes these actions of the Board as “erroneous”. … It says that United States v. Jones, Receiver, 336 U. S. 641 , and Capital Airlines, Inc. v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 850 , preclude this court from reviewing the rate determinations of the administrative-agency.

190812-19661

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 16, 2020

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … JOHNSON Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Catherynne Whitmore, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Trident Engineering & Procurement, P.C.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 8, 2023

See also Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59357, 59358, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,071 at 176,144 (The Board interpreting a clause stating, “‘caused by willful misconduct or lack of good faith’ of the contractor.”; the Board … Bank, 503 F.3d at1250; Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1370 (Fed.

190403-71827

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2021

Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995) (en banc). … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994) (a Veteran is competent to report on that of which he or she has personal knowledge).