Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.45s
Thermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 464 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2002
According to defendant, the promissory notes fail to qualify as allowable deferred compensation. … Miller's time was work expended as a principal investigator, that contention is belied by the audit of the day-timer records which, clearly differentiate between hours Mr.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDobbs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2025
Davy’s assessment was “[s]oft tissue defect after prior immunization.” Id. He opined, “I think that the immunization got into the body and was absorbed and was able to be effective for her. … He explained “[t]he anatomical site of left hip for intramuscular injection and the left thigh where [S.S.] has noticeable injury are clearly different anatomic sites.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedApplication of Russell B. Newton
414 F.2d 1400 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 18, 1969
Apart from “double patenting,” it is contended, the examiner’s rejection can be considered under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (g), such as to be immune from any avoidance by terminal disclaimer. … Having established that the claims do in fact define different inventions, it is clear that the terminal disclaimer by the common assignee overcomes the double patenting rejection.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGinn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2021
Ex. 13, Tab E at 3.10 The immune system is suggested to play a role in seizure development. Id. C. … Experts Qualifications Both experts are well qualified to opine on the causation issues presented by the facts and circumstances presented in this case. 1. Petitioners – Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZenith Electronics Corp. v. United States
18 Ct. Int'l Trade 882 · United States Court of International Trade · Sep 21, 1994
The methodology proposed by [the Unions) clearly would skew the discount amount * * * to the extent that dealers purchased other products. … It stated, Samsung cannot identify which particular sets qualified for the rebate * * *.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChoctaw Nation v. United States
83 Ct. Cl. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1936
Article 5 secured to members of each tribe the right to-freely settle within the jurisdiction of the other, and have all the rights, privileges, and immunities of citizens thereof,, except that no member of either tribe should … At all times prior to 1898 this was the established and accepted legal basis for the distribution of all common funds of the two tribes.
Cited 3 timesPublished71 T.C. 54 · United States Tax Court · Oct 23, 1978
The owner of the mineral interests or perpetual water rights could also make qualifying section 1031(a) exchanges for other land. … Yet it is well established that the execution of such a lease is not a transaction in which income is realized. It is only when the lessor-owner parts with his fee simple interest that a disposition occurs.
Cited 30 timesPublishedMadison Newspapers, Inc. v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 618 · United States Tax Court · Dec 26, 1956
This provision clearly refers to a physical consolidation of facilities; not a statutory consolidation of corporations. … The petitioner also refers to remarks of the respondent’s counsel at the hearing indicating a view that an acquiring corporation resulting from a merger might qualify as a taxpayer entitled to apply section 459 (c) while
Cited 1 timesPublishedC. Sanchez & Son, Inc. v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,152 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 8, 1991
Plaintiff relies on the six percent differential established by § 2(c) of Exec. … Furthermore, since the Safety Manual clearly requires ROPS to be installed on the trencher, we need not turn to custom and practice in the industry to aid in interpreting § 18.-B.20(a).
Cited 3 timesPublished11 I. & N. Dec. 740 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1966
It is established and uncontested that he did make such an application, it was granted and he was removed. … Third, it is .established that the visa issuing officer was not aware of the respondent's prior removal from the United States.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 235 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2011
Under subfactor 2, corporate commitment, the SSEB determined that Net-Services’ “detailed organizational chart” contained clearly defined lines of authority, responsibility, and communication. Id. … “The pivotal element of standing in a bid protest is whether a protestor qualifies as an ‘interested party’ under [section] 1491(b)(1).” RhinoCorps Ltd. v. United States, 87 Fed.Cl. 481, 485 (2009).
Cited 6 timesPublishedMondello v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2018
Geier, A case-control study of serious autoimmune adverse events following hepatitis B immunization, AUTOIMMUNITY, 38(4): 295-301 (2005), filed as Pet. … David Geier24 titled “A case-control study of serious autoimmune adverse events following hepatitis B immunization.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedIrving Berlin Music Corp. v. United States
487 F.2d 540 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1973
Ever since its establishment, Berlin Music has been actively engaged in the music-publishing business. … Thus, the royalty payments from ASCAP, half of which, after adjustments, were paid to Berlin Music, are clearly copyright royalties.
Cited 3 timesPublished135 T.C. 497 · United States Tax Court · Nov 8, 2010
When compared with section 6211(a)(1)(B), section 6664(a)(1)(B) contains the additional qualifying phrase “not so shown” before “previously assessed” but omits the qualifying phrase “as a deficiency” after the parenthetical … Clearly, then, so long as a taxpayer has no deficiency under section 6211(a), the plain meaning of the regulations’ language would cause a refund of a withholding credit to be a rebate under section 6664(a)(2). 5 Further,
Cited 17 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 2026
Turner qualified for the exception under 10 U.S.C. § 1414(a)(1) to receive concurrent payments. Id. In 2019, in response to one of Mr. … Neither the administrative record nor the government’s briefs clearly explain how Mr. Turner’s corrected retirement pay and recoupment were calculated, resulting in a total overpay- ment of $91,647.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co.
810 F. Supp. 1277 · United States Court of International Trade · Dec 15, 1992
A penalty assessed in a civil proceeding qualifies as “punishment” when “a defendant who has already been punished in a criminal prosecution [is] subjected to an additional civil sanction to the extent that the second sanction … Indeed, the defendants have been essentially left to claim failure to disclose all of the material facts allegedly establishing the violations charged.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDepartment of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Feb 18, 1983
Quinn, 419 F.2d 1014 (7th Cir. 1969) (FSLIC acting as instrumentality of United States may assert defense of sovereign immunity to extent that United States could); see also 12 U.S.C. §§ 1725(c)(4), 1728(c). … Congress in enacting the 1950 amendments clearly intended that the Antideficiency Act apply to funds of independent corporations.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZojirushi America Corp. v. United States
180 F. Supp. 3d 1354 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 4, 2016
Clearly, the action Customs took on Protest No. 2704-14-101380 was not an allowance. … Customs issued a decision disposing of that protest, but that decision does not qualify as an allowance or a denial of the protest for purposes of 19 U.S.C. § 1515.
Cited 4 timesPublished134 T.C. 156 · United States Tax Court · Feb 23, 2010
We do not here decide whether petitioner qualifies for relief from joint and several liability under sec. 6015. 3 Mr. … We found that the record clearly established that the taxpayer husband had participated meaningfully in a prior court proceeding.
Cited 13 timesPublished621 F.2d 373 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1980
Officers selected for TAR designation may, therefore, have a *298 reasonable expectation of a gratifying career in an extremely important functional area of the Navy, and may anticipate a promising opportunity to qualify … Regular officer tenure was established years ago during the formative period of the Navy.
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna