Case law

Jerry M Sprouse v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2024 MSPB 12 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 25, 2024

rule applied to Board proceedings and that the Board’s prior decision to the contrary, Delk, 57 M.S.P.R. at 530-32, had since been overruled by the Federal Circuit in Wiley v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357, 364-69 & n.4 (1998) (declining to apply the rule to parole revocation hearings); Immigration and Naturalization Service v.

Kingsford Co. v. Commissioner

41 T.C. 646 · United States Tax Court · Feb 24, 1964

Brown, 325 F. 2d 313 (C.A. 9, 1962), affirming 37 T.C. 461, 488 (1961). See also Pretzer v. United States, - F. Supp, - (1961) (not reported). … Such distribution shall be as of the record date established therefor by the Board of Directors of Kingsford.

200103-51710

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2020

Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993). … The Board must also assess the credibility, and therefore the probative value, of the evidence of record in its entirety. Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 429 (1995).

In re National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice Litigation

52 F. Supp. 3d 1377 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Oct 9, 2014

No. 1:13-1963 District of Maryland NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURIS-DICTION PRACTICE, ET AL. v. HOLDER, ET AL., C.A. … Huvelle, Amy Berman Jackson, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Richard J. Leon, Richard W. Roberts, Emmet G. Sullivan, Reggie B. Walton, Robert L. Wilkins; Richard D. Bennett, Catherine C. Blake, James K.

John C. Kohler Co. v. United States

498 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

On review, the test to be applied is whether, on the basis of the evidence before it, the action taken by the Board was a reasonable one. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715 (1963); Koppers Co. v. … The Board found that plaintiff had performed the tests. The Uniform Commercial Code is applicable to the field of public contracts. Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.

Pacific Architects & Engineers Inc. v. United States

491 F.2d 734 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1974

Board appears to be correct. … United States v. Utah Constr. Co., supra at 419. In Schlesinger v.

Thomas v. Michael

166 F.2d 944 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 27, 1948

See Bogoslowsky v. Huse, 31 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1034, 1038, 142 F. (2d) 75, 78, 61 USPQ 367 . … See, Larson v. Eicher, 18 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1497, 49 F. (2d) 1029, 1031, 9 U. S. Pat. Q. 461; Fenton R. Brydle v. Harry H. Honigbaum, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 773, 54 F. (2d) 147, 11 U. S. Pat. Q. 219; Kyrides v.

Dofflemyer v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 277 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 1992

See Lehman v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 339, 341-342 (1991); Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 313-314 (1991). … Hohol v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 169, 172 (1992).

Royal Crown Company, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2021

v. The Coca-Cola Company Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 Barbara A. … By the Board: The Board has chosen to redesignate the decision that issued on May 3, 2019 as a precedent.

Royal Crown Company, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2021

v. The Coca-Cola Company Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 Barbara A. … By the Board: The Board has chosen to redesignate the decision that issued on May 3, 2019 as a precedent.

Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United States

389 F.2d 424 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1968

Oil Co. v. National Shawmut Bank, 342 Mass. 108 , 172 N.E.2d 104 , 105 n. 1 (1961). See also Scott-Burr Stores Corp. v. … Franklin Co. v. United States, 381 F.2d 416, 419 , 180 Ct.Cl. -, (July 1967). . Blanchard v.

11-25 890

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

See 38 C.F.R. § 3.385; see also Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … Brown, 104 F.3d 1328, 1332 (1997); Romanowsky v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 289 (2013); McClain v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.

In Re Dreyfus

65 F.2d 472 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 12, 1933

C. 599; Kasser Egg Process Co. v. Poultry Producers of Central California (C. C. A.) 59 F. (2d) 141; Rohm et al. v. Martin Dennis Co. (D. C.) 263 F. 106 ; affirmed by the U. S. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Dillon v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 631 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1981

Wesolowski v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 682, 688-89 (1966). … Bookman v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 108 , 453 F.2d 1263 (1972).

Guy H. Briscoe v. The United States

442 F.2d 953 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 1021, 1022-1023 , 114 Ct.Cl. 286, 334 (1949); Fehlhaber Corp. v. … Cf., e. g., Pacific Alaska Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 436 F.2d 461 , 193 Ct.Cl. - (Jan. 1971); Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. United States, 412 F.2d 1325 , 188 Ct.Cl. 1062 (1969); Woodcrest Constr. v.

Blanchard v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 300 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 30, 1992

In accordance with our decision in Manio v. … See 38 U.S.C. § 1151 (formerly § 351); Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584 (1991). The July 10, 1990, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals is AFFIRMED.

The American Novawood Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc., Assignee, by Merger and Change of Name of United States Plywood Corporation

426 F.2d 823 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 21, 1970

lumber products, i. e., particle board or fiber board. … Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Opposer had fair notice.

Gilbane Federal v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2026

Here, an “agency board” includes the ASBCA. Id. § 7101(2)(A). This Court “possesses broad discretion in exercising its power to consolidate” or transfer a case to an agency board. Joseph Morton Co. v. … Co. v. Gen. Servs.

Merando, Inc. v. United States

475 F.2d 603 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973

Although this court is not bound by the Board’s interpretation of the contract provisions, since such is a matter of law, (International Telephone and Telegraph v. United States, 197 Ct. … Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 912, 918 , 428 F. 2d 1267, 1271 (1970); Paschen Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 190 Ct.

Fluharty v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 409 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 18, 1992

In reaching its decision, the Board must provide adequate reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions. See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … See Hersey v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 91, 94 , (1992).