Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.80s

  • United States v. Borgfeldt

    12 Ct. Cust. 324 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1924

    —Scaramelli v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134 ; T. D. 40056). … The object of the law requiring such a statement is well expressed by Barber, Judge, in Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • REYES

    17 I. & N. Dec. 512 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

    Pfeifer v. … Peignand v. INS, id.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Whelan v. United States

    34 Cust. Ct. 208 · United States Customs Court · Jun 2, 1955

    United States v. Gardel Industries, 33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 118, C. A. D. 325; Yardley & Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, 41 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 85, C. A. D. 533; Joseph E. Seagram cfe Sons, Inc. v. … Granted its properties differ in certain essentials from those of other paper or pulpboards, as noted so clearly in the case of Masonite Corporation v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 13-03 789

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

    Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996), citing Gilbert, 1 Vet. App. at 54. Factual Background and Analysis In accordance with 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2, 4.41, 4.42 (2014) and Schafrath v. … Additional Considerations VA must consider all favorable lay evidence of record. 38 USCA § 5107(b); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • General Petroleum Corp. v. United States

    56 Cust. Ct. 249 · United States Customs Court · Mar 21, 1966

    United States v. Brown, Durrell & Co., 127 Fed. 793 (T.D. 25074); Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 1 Cust. Ct. 78 , C.D. 22; Wong Sang Man v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 248 , C.D. 1379; Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. … Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States, supra; Wong Sang Man v. United States, supra; The Lansdowne Distillery v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 190 , C.D. 1925.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 12-31 417

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

    Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448-49 (1995) (en banc); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. … The Board must consider all the evidence of record and make appropriate determinations of competence, credibility, and weight. See Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 368 (2005).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nagler v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 297 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 6, 1991

    See Mullane v. … V.

    Overruled by Thomas J. Kuzma, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 341 F.3d 1327 (2003)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. United States

    99 Fed. Cl. 17 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 15, 2011

    The Board’s decision that plaintiff is not entitled to disability retirement was appropriate according to applicable standards of review for the BCNR. Barnes v. … The Corrections Board had no obligation to adopt the Social Security Administration’s findings with regard to plaintiffs disability status. See Kidwell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • J. F. Barbour & Sons v. United States

    63 F. Supp. 349 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1945

    Gothwaite v. The United States, 102 *351 Ct. … Gothwaite v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • DRS Global Enterprise Solutions, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 11, 2019

    Dated: February 11,2019 . )V}~ c9'CcA MICHAEL N. … of DRS Global Enterprise Solutions, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dumont v. Commissioner

    4 T.C. 158 · United States Tax Court · Sep 30, 1944

    In Lynch v. … Brown v. Routzahn, 63 Fed. (2d) 914; certiorari denied, 290 U. S. 641 . Cf. Estate of John Sage, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. American Express Co.

    44 Cust. Ct. 779 · United States Customs Court · Mar 11, 1960

    See United States v. M. V. Jenkins et al., 26 Cust. Ct. 467 , Reap. Dec. 7924, affirmed in United States v. M. V. Jenkins et al., 39 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 158, C.A.D. 479. … Company v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Newman v. United States

    185 Ct. Cl. 269 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1968

    Nichols v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 412 (1962) ; Snell v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 219 (1964). It is not the function of this court to substitute its own judgment for that of the board. … Wales v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 765 , 130 F. Supp. 900 (1955) ; Boland v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 145 (1965).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Common Sense Press Inc DBA Pocket Jacks Comics v. Ethan Van Sciver and Antonio J. Malpica

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 19, 2023

    Citations to the cancellation record refer to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., 109 USPQ2d 1473, 1476 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … See Blonder-- Tongue Labs., Inc. v. Univ. of Ill.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacific Alaska Contractors, Inc. v. The United States

    436 F.2d 461 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1971

    Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 325 F.2d 451 , 163 Ct.Cl. 339 (1963), and J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Village Apartment Homes, Inc. v. Bowles

    149 F.2d 649 · Emergency Court of Appeals · May 18, 1945

    Madison Park Corporation et al. v. Bowles, Em.App., 1943, 140 F.2d 316 . Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 1944, 140 F.2d 459 ; Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 355 . Hastings v. … See also Roth Hotel Co. et al. v. Bowles, Em.App.1944, 144 F.2d 877 ; Northwood Apts., Inc. v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 809 . Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, supra. Cf. Roth Hotel Co. et al. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 13-26 926

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

    Duro v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 530 (1992); Dacoron v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 115, 120 (1993). … Where the law and not the evidence is dispositive of the issue before the Board, the claim must be denied because of the absence of legal merit or the lack of entitlement under the law. See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wiesner v. Weigert

    666 F.2d 582 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 10, 1981

    In line with Moran v. Paskert, 205 USPQ 356 , 359 (Bd.Pat.Int.1979); Brecker v. … The board considered oral affirmation of the contents of the affidavits a device to circumvent the rules. We cannot agree. The board’s interpretation of its own rules is entitled to great weight. See, e.g., Cook v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. United States

    26 Cl. Ct. 1471 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 28, 1992

    Wright v. … See Paskert v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 65, 77 (1990). The proceedings before the Formal Board of Officers complied with the requirements of AR 15-6. Martinez was present before the board.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • John Doe v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

    2015 MSPB 57 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 7, 2015

    BACKGROUND ¶2 In Doe v. … See Sterner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.