Case law

Sells v. Commissioner

10 T.C. 692 · United States Tax Court · Apr 27, 1948

See also Beggs v. United States , 27 Fed. Supp. 599 . … Colton v. Colton , 127 U.S. 300 ; Busby v. Lynn , 37 Tex. 146 .

200903-108092

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 29, 2021

The Board also finds the Veteran competent and credible to testify and report that he experienced tinnitus during service because such symptoms are readily observable. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 471 (1994). … See Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 268, 271 (1993); Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 163 (1993).

Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Social Security Administration

2016 MSPB 31 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2016

See Mauldin v. U.S. … See Martin v. U.S.

Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Social Security Administration

2016 MSPB 31 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2016

See Mauldin v. U.S. … See Martin v. U.S.

Structural Finishing, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,456 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1988

Link v. Wabash R.R. … See also Rowe v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 802 F.2d 434 (Fed.Cir.1986); Whitaker v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 784 F.2d 1109, 1110 (Fed.Cir.1986); Massingale v.

Guy H. Briscoe v. The United States

442 F.2d 953 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 1021, 1022-1023 , 114 Ct.Cl. 286, 334 (1949); Fehlhaber Corp. v. … Cf., e. g., Pacific Alaska Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 436 F.2d 461 , 193 Ct.Cl. - (Jan. 1971); Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. United States, 412 F.2d 1325 , 188 Ct.Cl. 1062 (1969); Woodcrest Constr. v.

Monterey Life Systems, Inc. v. United States

635 F.2d 821 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1980

DECISION OF THE BOARD This court’s review of the decision of the Provider Appeal Board is limited. The standard for such a review was established in our decision in Goldstein v. … Co. v.

United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 33 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 30, 1918

action; and further, that, under the holding of this court in Illfelder v. … United States v. Chattanooga Brewing Co. ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 375 ; T. D. 32965); United States v. Danker & Marston ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 462 ; T. D. 32208); Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust.

Lurkins v. Commissioner

49 T.C. 452 · United States Tax Court · Jan 31, 1968

Bloch v. Commissioner, 254 F. 2d 277 ; Boccuto v. Commissioner, 277 F. 2d 549 ; Skolski v. Commissioner, 351 F. 2d 485 . … Board of Tax Appeals, Washington, D.C. 20044.”

Michael E. Stuart v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 458 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2013

v. … Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 235 (1974); see, e.g., Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 (1957); Wagner v. United States, 365 F.3d. 1358, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Vogue v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 779 (Fed.

Frontline Support Solutions, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 14, 2026

Dixon v. Shinseki, 741 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014). Frontline has not demonstrated that reconsideration of our original decision is warranted. … Co., ASBCA 3 No. 60657, 18-1 BCA ¶ 37,082 at 180,495 (citing Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 333 F.3d 1358, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).

International Automotriz

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 4, 2016

The Board's conclusion was based upon controlling precedent in Trauma Serv. Group v. United States, 104 F.3d 1321, 1325 (Fed. … The Board declined to do so because it was unnecessary to the result.

CKY Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 19, 2020

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney Chiara V. McGowan, Esq. … in ASBCA No. 61917, Appeal of CKY Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

190403-71827

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2021

Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995) (en banc). … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994) (a Veteran is competent to report on that of which he or she has personal knowledge).

13-29 227

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

See Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Therefore, on remand, the examiner is request to supplement his opinion. … Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999).

Collins v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 32 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 23, 1991

In Voge v. … As stated in Hary v.

In re Wadlinger

496 F.2d 1200 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1974

Nicherson [sic] v. Bearfoot Sole Co., Inc., (CA 6) [ 311 F.2d 858 ] 136 U.S. P.Q. 96 5 accord, McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys Inc. … See also Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co., 217 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1954).

Prysmian Cables & Sys. USA, LLC v. United States

756 F. Supp. 3d 1337 · United States Court of International Trade · Jan 22, 2025

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Application of Frederick K. Kirchner

305 F.2d 897 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 25, 1962

This was the reasoning of the Scudi case, cited by the board, and was urged by Coan in the Biel v. Coan case. … As was said in Biel v.

Smith v. United States

155 Ct. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1961

Hearing was granted by the correction board. … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 ; Watson v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 749 ; Glackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404 , 296 F. 2d 226 .