Case law

Griffin & Dickson v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,894 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1990

Contract boards of appeal must abide by this high standard. Metadure Corp. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 61 (1984). … the appeal to the Board.

Continental Oil Co. v. United States

14 F. Supp. 533 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

Christopher Co. v. Commissioner, 60 App. D.C. 368 , 55 F.(2d) 530 ; Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean (C.C.A.) 58 F.(2d) 737 . … Phillips et al. v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589 , 51 S.Ct. 608 , 75 L.Ed. 1289 . The Board of Tax Appeals in a recent decision (Continental Oil Company v.

McCadney v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 25, 2025

Prewitt v. United States, No. 22-1673, 2025 WL 452357, at *10 (Fed. Cl. Feb. 10, 2025). The Court does not purport to decide whether the Board should have accepted the VA exam’s results. Hatmaker v. … The Board adopted this explanation. AR 17–18. The Court recently confronted a similar issue in Culpepper v. United States.

The Deltec Corporation v. The United States

326 F.2d 1004 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964

In 1954 the defendant entered into a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with Brown-Raymond-Walsh (B-R-W) to construct three military air facilities in Spain. … As the case has developed, out of the various defenses raised, we need consider only this across-the-board position.

Casey D. Weathers v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 57 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 24, 2014

Department of Labor v. … See Clark v.

Jerry M Sprouse v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2024 MSPB 12 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 25, 2024

rule applied to Board proceedings and that the Board’s prior decision to the contrary, Delk, 57 M.S.P.R. at 530-32, had since been overruled by the Federal Circuit in Wiley v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357, 364-69 & n.4 (1998) (declining to apply the rule to parole revocation hearings); Immigration and Naturalization Service v.

H-A-A-V

29 I. & N. Dec. 233 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Sep 11, 2025

Mathews v. … See Liteky v.

Rogers v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1023 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1992

Brown v. United States, 5 Ci.Ct. 1, 16 (1984). … See Pinkston v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 263, 265-67 (1984); Singleton v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 156, 164 (1984); South Louisiana Grain Services v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 281, 288 (1982). .

In re Keukovsky

184 F.2d 333 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1950

Appellants contend “(1) that Olsen & Brown’s experiments were not in fact conclusive even as to the role of ascorbic acid with ‘washed cream’; (2) that even if they had conclusively established that ascorbic acid caused tallowy … The decision of the Board of Appeals accordingly is affirmed.

Midland Cooperatives, Inc. v. Midland International Corporation

421 F.2d 754 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 26, 1970

In Robert Hall Clothes, Inc. v. … The board correctly applied the principle of estoppel. The board, properly, we think, cited in support of its decision Seven-Up Company v.

LEE

13 I. & N. Dec. 214 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1969

Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 399 F.2d 98 (6th Cir. 1268) ; Tsacomaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 897 P.2d 946 (7th Cir. 1968). … Muslemi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, No. 22, 419 (9th Cir.

John C. Kohler Co. v. United States

498 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

On review, the test to be applied is whether, on the basis of the evidence before it, the action taken by the Board was a reasonable one. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715 (1963); Koppers Co. v. … The Board found that plaintiff had performed the tests. The Uniform Commercial Code is applicable to the field of public contracts. Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.

Kinsman Corthell v. Department of Homeland Security

2016 MSPB 23 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 7, 2016

Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643-44 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Agoranos v.

Phillip Brown v. Department of the Navy

Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 28, 2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD PHILLIP BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, PH-0752-13-0914-I-1 … See Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed.

Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

461 F.2d 1352 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Co. v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 50 , 418 F. 2d 1356 (1969); Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct. … V. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 358 , 393 F. 2d 807 (1968) ; Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 644 , 413 F. 2d 568 (1969) ; Lykes-Youngstown Corp. v. United States, 190 Ct.

Royal Crown Company, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2021

v. The Coca-Cola Company Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 Barbara A. … By the Board: The Board has chosen to redesignate the decision that issued on May 3, 2019 as a precedent.

Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2021

v. The Coca-Cola Company Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 Barbara A. … By the Board: The Board has chosen to redesignate the decision that issued on May 3, 2019 as a precedent.

Royal Crown Company, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2021

v. The Coca-Cola Company Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 Barbara A. … By the Board: The Board has chosen to redesignate the decision that issued on May 3, 2019 as a precedent.

Braun v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 84 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1963

He appeared before another Army retiring board on December 18, 1946, and this board determined that he was not permanently incapacitated for active duty and recommended full general military service. … Plaintiff concedes that this case must be decided adversely to him pursuant to Lipp v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 197 , 301 F. 2d 674 , (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 , and Friedman, v. United States, 159 Ct.

Dofflemyer v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 277 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 1992

See Lehman v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 339, 341-342 (1991); Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 313-314 (1991). … Hohol v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 169, 172 (1992).