Case law

MARTINEZ-SOLIS

14 I. & N. Dec. 93 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1972

Our authority to reopen and remand a case for such a purpose has been sustained by the courts, Tejeda v. INS, 346 F.2d 95 Interim Decision #2135 389, 392 (C.A. 9, 1965); Field v. … INS,313 F.2d 743 (C.A.3, 1963); Wood v. Hoy, 266 F.2d 825, 831 (C.A.9, 1959); Tandaric v. Robinson, 257 F.2d 895, 899 (C.A. 7, 1958). Cf. United States v. Ramos, 413 F.2d 743, 746 (C.A. 1, 1969).

Calhoun v. Commissioner

23 T.C. 4 · United States Tax Court · Oct 7, 1954

Whitelock v. Whitelock, 156 Md. 115 , 143 Atl. 712, 715 ; Brown v. Brown, 204 Md. 197 , 103 A. 2d 856, 863 . … In McCord v. Granger, 201 F. 2d 103 , the Court of Appeals pointed out that the single circumstance of a return reporting both husband’s and wife’s income is not sufficient to hold that it was a joint return. Cf.

Holt v. United States

140 F. Supp. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

be presented to the Retiring Board. … Plaintiff claims that on the basis of the decisions in the cases of Hamrick v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 17 , and Ramsey v. United States, 123 C.

McCulloch Gas Processing Corp. v. Canadian Hidrogas Resources, Ltd.

577 F.2d 712 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · May 9, 1978

A. v. Comptoir de la Parfumerie, S. A. … See Jackson v. Griffith, 480 F.2d 261 (CA 10 1973); Campana Corp. v. Harrison, 135 F.2d 334 (CA 7 1943).

Godwin v. United States

54 Fed. Cl. 217 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2002

Co. v. … See Bowles v.

190816-26848

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2020

. § 3.344(a); Kitchens v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 320 (1995). In Brown v. … Brown, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) determined that the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.344(a) only apply where the rating to be reduced has continued for five years or more. Brown v.

United States v. Mulhens

4 Ct. Cust. 496 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 18, 1913

Its opinion in the case at bar was rested upon the authority of Hempstead v. United States ( 168 Fed., 450 ), Woodruff v. United States ( 168 Fed., 452 ), and the case of United States v. Zinn ( 2 Ct. Cust. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Darla Gaetos v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2014 MSPB 39 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 2, 2014

Moorman v. Department of the Army, 68 M.S.P.R. 60 , 62-63 (1995), aff'd sub nom. Moorman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 79 F.3d 1167 (Fed. … See Noble v. U.S.

Serge A. Loukomsky v. Hans Gerlich

264 F.2d 907 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 16, 1959

Stern v. Schroeder, 36 F.2d 518 , 17 CCPA 690; Hartog v. Long, 47 F.2d 365 , 18 CCPA 993; Field v. Stow, 49 F.2d 840 , 18 CCPA 1437. … Den Beste v. Martin, supra, and Mantz v. Jackson, 140 F.2d 161 , 31 CCPA 824, 832.

Goodenough v. United States

19 F. Supp. 254 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

In the case last cited it was said: “In Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 144 , 69 Ct.Cl. 158 , and Arthur Curtiss James v. United States, 38. … . -, and Wood v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 17 F.Supp. 521 . In the early case of Toland v.

American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States

291 F.2d 931 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Bull Steamship Company v. United States, 1952, 123 Ct.Cl. 520 , 108 F.Supp. 95 , and Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 1953, 127 Ct.Cl. 409 , 119 F.Supp. 731 . … Other cases in this court applying comparably relevant principles are Clapp v. United States, 1954, 127 Ct.Cl. 505 , 117 F.Supp. 576 and Suwannee S. S. Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 279 F.2d 874 .

Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Franklin

822 F. Supp. 759 · United States Court of International Trade · May 21, 1993

See also Olympus Corp. v. … Corp. v.

Michael Gaydar v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 52 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 17, 2014

(citing Wilson v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 807 F.2d 1577 , 1581 (Fed. … See Caven v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 392 F.3d 1378 , 1381-82 (Fed.

09-06 925

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

KL v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 205, 208 (1993); Crawford v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 33, 35 (1995). … Hazan v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 511 (1997); Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Hardeman-Monier-Hutcherson v. United States

458 F.2d 1364 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

Cl. 1302 , 364 F. 2d 357 (1966); Lenry, Inc. v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 46 , 297 F. 2d 550 (1962). The court holds that the board was correct. … Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 437 , 312 F. 2d 774 (1963). See also, e.g., Aerodex, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 344 , 417 F. 2d 1361 (1969); J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v.

Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.

473 F.2d 901 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 1, 1973

See Ford Motor Co. v. Ford, 462 F.2d 1405, 1407 , 59 C.C.P.A.-, - (1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 1109 , 93 S.Ct. 910 , 34 L. Ed.2d 690 (1973); Commerce Drug Co. v. … See International Paper Co. v. Valley Paper Co., 468 F.2d 937 , 60 C.C.P.A. - (1972).

Akira Technologies, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 25, 2021

Roger V. Abbott, Esq. Miles & Stockbridge P.C. … that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62304, Appeal of Akira Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

H-L-H- & Z-Y-Z

25 I. & N. Dec. 209 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

See Jian Hui Shao v. … See Qin Wen Zheng v.

Adams v. United States

48 Fed. Cl. 602 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2001

The court included no discussion, merely referring to an earlier decision, Brown v. … Brown , in turn, relied on Loeffler v.

Rumph v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 855 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1981

In DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. … See, e.g., Hankins v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 34 (1968), and decisions cited at 34, n.l. Resort to the Correction Board for the upgrading of a discharge is, however, permissive, not mandatory. E.g. Mathis v.