Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

2.15s

  • Hiett v. United States

    130 F. Supp. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

    The Board, however, made his retirement pay effective only from October 1,1951. … Womer v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 415 ; Hamrick v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 17 , and Ramsey v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 504 , certiorari denied 345 U. S. 994 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • 12-26 148

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

    Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See Deluca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 206 -08 (1995), 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a , DC 5242 (2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bateman v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 351 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 17, 1936

    The Board’s decision was affirmed in Green's Adv. Agency v. Blair, 31 Fed. (2d) 96. and became final on May 11, 1929. … In Bull v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Pipes v. United States

    134 Fed. Cl. 380 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2017

    See Soriano v. … First, there are certain “exceptional circumstances where the court may consider new evidence that was not before the corrections board,” Miller v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 717, 730 (2015) (citing Metz v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brogden v. Slater

    40 F.2d 988 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1930

    Seymour v. Molyneux, 49 App. D. C. 216, 263 F. 468 . … Gowen v. Hendry & King (Cust. & Pat. App.) 37 F.(2d) 426 ; Lynch v. Headley et al., 52 App. I). C. 269, 285 F. 1003 . Appellant asserts, however, that this rule is not applicable here.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • DSME Construction Co., Ltd.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 30, 2024

    See Parsons Evergreene v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 968 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (source of funding does not abrogate CDA jurisdiction). … See also OSHCO-PAE-SOMC v. United States, 16 Cl. Ct. 614 (1989); Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Ctr. v. Dalton, 107 F.3d 854 at 858 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Minesen Co. v. McHugh, 671 F.3d 1332, 1340-41 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States

    7 Cl. Ct. 673 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1985

    It is well-established that this court has jurisdiction to review the actions of military correction boards and service secretaries, see Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 760-761 (1974); Hertzog v. … Similarly, in Friedman v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Application of Mogen David Wine Corporation

    328 F.2d 925 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 2, 1964

    Button Corporation, 50 F.Supp. 708 (D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1943); Oneida, Ltd. v. National Silver Co., 25 N.Y.S.2d 271 (N.Y.Sup.Ct., 1940); Prince Matchabelli Inc. v. … Anhalt & Co., Inc., 40 F.Supp. 848 (D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1941), and Falcon Industries, Inc. et al. v. R. S. Herbert Co., Inc. et al., 128 F.Supp. 204 (D.C.E.D.N.Y., 1955).

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Rebsamen Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner

    44 B.T.A. 36 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1941

    REBSAMEN MOTORS, INCORPORATED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rebsamen Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 99532. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 44 B.T.A. 36 ; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1393 ; April 3, 1941 , Promulgated *1393 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Child v. United States

    18 Cust. Ct. 11 · United States Customs Court · Jan 9, 1947

    ¡V-15, that 'the 15,041 board feet of lumber made into shifting boards and feeder boxes were built into the hull of the vessel as a permanent installation, as that term may be understood, and that the term “ equipment is … United States, Abstract 41649; United States v. Richard & Co., 8 Ct. Cust. Appls, 231, T. D. 37496; Admiral Oriental Line v. United States, 56 Treas. Dec. 234 , T. D. 43585; Folger v. United States, 2 Treas.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Miller v. United States

    29 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 1993

    In Blevins v. … See also Mullen v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Application of Dalton

    188 F.2d 170 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1951

    With respect to that phase of the controversy the examiner cited the case of United Carbon Co. et al. v. Binney & Smith Co., 317 U.S. 228 , 63 S.Ct. 165 , 87 L.Ed. 232 . … We are not in agreement with counsel for appellants in his argument that the doctrine of the United Carbon Co. case, supra, and the Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fletcher v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 394 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 16, 1991

    HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge: This case concerns an appeal of a Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that the veteran’s industrial impairment was only “considerable” and, hence, he was not entitled to more than … See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56 (1990); Webster v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 155, 158 (1991). Appellant was on active duty between 1948 and 1951.

    Cited 334 timesPublished
  • Creamer v. United States

    174 Ct. Cl. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

    Misuraca v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 387 , 394 (1956); De Busk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790, 796-97 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 988 (1956); Athinson v. United States, 144 Ct. … Fahey v. Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245, 249-53 (1947); Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742, 784-86 (1948); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 896-97 (1961).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bone v. Commissioner

    52 T.C. 913 · United States Tax Court · Sep 8, 1969

    Bone, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent; Thos. E. Bone, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Bone v. … Code sec. 103 (West 1955); Brown v. North Ventura Road Development Co ., 216 Cal. App. 2d 227 , 30 Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Keith L. Keller v. the United States 0

    113 Fed. Cl. 779 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2013

    Plaintiff’s burden is to show by “‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’” that the decision of the board fails this standard. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. … Plaintiff must also overcome the presumption of regularity which attaches to the actions of the board. See, e.g., Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Palacios v. United States

    100 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 7, 2011

    See Henderson v. … Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1303 (Fed.Cir.2003).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mohr v. Derwinski

    3 Vet. App. 63 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 11, 1992

    Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). … As we said in Gilbert v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 09-35 173

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

    Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). The Board will proceed with the adjudication of this appeal. … The Board notes that the Veteran is competent to give evidence about personally observable symptoms, such as joint pain. Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tyrrell v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 707 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1936

    Combs, 296 U.S. 365 , reversing 76 Fed.(2d) 682 , which affirmed memorandum decision of this Board; Swanson v. … Commissioner, 296 U.S. 362 , affirming 76 Fed.(2d) 651 , which affirmed memorandum decision of this Board; Commissioner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.