Case law

Andrew C. Eller, Jr. v. Office of Personnel Management

2014 MSPB 72 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 5, 2014

Mitchell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 741 F.3d 81, 87 (Fed. … Resnick v.

99-13 421

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015

See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994) (where the law is dispositive, the claim must be denied due to a lack of legal merit); Dela Cruz v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 143, 149 (2001); Mason v. Principi, 16 Vet. … See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994).

Yufan Hu v. TJ Food Service, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 8, 2017

However, the Board may consider the terms of a contract if, and to the extent that, construction of the contract is necessary to a decision on matters within the Board’s jurisdiction. See Selva & Sons, Inc. v. … See AT & T Techs., Inc. v.

06-38 090

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

See Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 532 (1993). Any change in diagnostic code by a VA adjudicator must be specifically explained. See Pernorio v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 625, 629 (1992). … Brown, 7 Vet. App. 411, 414 (1995); Tatum v. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 152 (2009).

Nnenna Lovette Nkanginieme v. Lovette Appleton

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 7, 2023

See King Candy Co. v. … .”); Signal Cos. v.

Zoeller v. United States

65 Fed. Cl. 449 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 12, 2005

The plaintiff has already presented this issue to the ASBCA in Board Case No. 54205, and to the Federal Circuit in Zoeller v. Brownlee, 113 Fed.Appx. 390 . … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 41 (1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1374 (Fed.Cir. 1984); see also United Techs. Corp. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp., 189 F.3d 1338, 1344 (Fed.Cir.1999).

Mansoor International Development Services

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 4, 2014

In March 2012, the government issued a letter indicating the termination of the contract for cause, without providing the complete notification of rights required by FAR 33.21 l(a)(4)(v). … The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the implications of a defective termination notice in Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F .3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

Middleton v. United States

170 Ct. Cl. 36 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

Sofranoff v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 470 (1964); Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404, 410 , 296 F. 2d 226, 229 (1960); same case, 161 Ct. Cl. 34 (1963); Smith v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 682 (1961); Murray v. … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957). We have several times held that a discharge issued in violation of regulations is a nullity. Sofranoff v. United States, supra; Smith v. United States, supra; Murray v.

Michael Gaydar v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 52 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 17, 2014

(citing Wilson v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 807 F.2d 1577 , 1581 (Fed. … See Caven v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 392 F.3d 1378 , 1381-82 (Fed.

Anderson v. Natta

480 F.2d 1392 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 19, 1973

See Fang v. Hankins, 399 F.2d 262 , 55 CCPA 1468 (1968). … Brenner v. Manson was decided on March 21, 1966. *1398 2.

08-38 839

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

Brown, 6 Vet. App. 157 (1994). … See Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361, 363 (1993).

Kvalnes v. Wright

183 F.2d 193 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1950

“With respect to utility, Kvalnes cites the well-known case of Corona Cord Tire Co. v. … Knutson et al. v. Gallsworthy, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 304 , 164 F.2d 497 , 74 U.S.P.Q. 324 , 608 O.G. 215 . The case of Potter v.

Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United States

479 F.2d 1342 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

He reiterated this point in Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 193 Ct. … Cutler- Hammer, Inc. v. United States, supra at 89, 416 F. 2d at 1314 . Thus as to both of these items there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that the data was reasonably available.

Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.

576 F.2d 926 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 8, 1978

HyTop Products Division v. … In Maremont Corp. v. Air Lift Co., 463 F.2d 1114 , 59 CCPA 1152, 174 USPQ 395 (1972), and in Baker’s Franchise Corp. v.

Ball State University v. United States

488 F.2d 1014 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973

Bishop Engineering Co. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 411 (1967). There is nothing to show it construed the contract as it now does before signing it. … Chernick v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 498 , 372 F. 2d 492 (1967).

Michael R. Jones v. Department of Agriculture

Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 29, 2014

Generally, the Board lacks the authority to review an employee’s decision to resign or retire, because these actions are presumed to be voluntary. Brown v. U.S. … See Loredo v.

Crellin v. Commissioner

17 T.C. 781 · United States Tax Court · Nov 13, 1951

Scatena, 85 F. 2d 729 ; Louisville Trust Co. v. Gleen, 65 F. Supp. 193 ; Fletcher Cyclopedia of Corporations, vol. 11, ¶5323. … Meyers v. El Tejon Oil & Refining Co., 29 Cal. 2d 184 , 174 P. 2d 1 .

In re Honeywell, Inc.

532 F.2d 180 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1976

Best Lock Corp. v. Schlage Lock Co.; 413 F.2d 1195 , 56 CCPA 1472 (1969); In re Deister Concentrator Co., 289 F.2d 496 , 48 CCPA 952 (1961). … However, the board did not consider the transparent disk to be “unclaimed.”

Pitcher v. Commissioner

31 B.T.A. 957 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 28, 1934

Register v. Commissioner, 69 Fed. (2d) 607; Kreipke v. Commissioner, 32 Fed. (2d) 694, affirming 7 B. T. A. 777; Burnet v. Livezey, 48 Fed. (2d) 159; Harry D. Kremer, 31 B. T. A. 566. … Such facts were present in Burnet v. Livezey, supra, and United States v. Butler, 49 Fed. (2d) 52, cases in which the compensation was Held to be exempt *961 from tax.

In re Honeywell, Inc.

497 F.2d 1344 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1974

The solicitor has presented for our consideration a chain of authorities— Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co., 163 U.S. 169 , 16 S.Ct. 1002 , 41 L.Ed. 118 (1896); Kellogg Co. v. … Nor do we believe that the language of the opinions in Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 , 84 S.Ct. 784 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 661 (1964), and Compeo Corp. v.