Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.45s

  • Electric Boat Corporation

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 7, 2019

    January 24, 2019 at 2) Subsequent to the Board's order, Electric Boat did, in fact, seek review of our December 10, 2018 decision before the Federal Circuit. Electric Boat Corp. v. … For the reasons stated above. we grant Electric Boat's motion to stay proceedings pending the Federal Circuit's resolution of Electric Boat Corp. v. Secretary of the Navy, No. 19-1621 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles R. Nesbitt v. The United States

    345 F.2d 583 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

    John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 325 F.2d 438 , 163 Ct.Cl. 381 (1963) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 , 84 S.Ct. 1332 , 12 L.Ed.2d 295 (1964); Brown & Son Electric Co. v. … United States, 162 Ct.Cl. 566, 568-569 (1963); Brown & Son Electric Co. v-United States, supra, 325 F.2d at 450, 163 Ct.Cl. at 472; Litchfield Mfg. Corp. v. United States, supra, 338 F.2d at 96-97, 99.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Dominguez v. United States

    55 Cust. Ct. 401 · United States Customs Court · Jul 27, 1965

    In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger jointed molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States

    55 Cust. Ct. 479 · United States Customs Court · Nov 23, 1965

    In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger joined molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hearne v. United States

    68 F. Supp. 786 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1946

    The plaintiff’s situation is substantially identical with that of Townsley who was given a judgment by this court, Townsley v. … Justice Day speaking for the Supreme Court of the United States in Norris v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Rebsamen Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner

    44 B.T.A. 36 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1941

    REBSAMEN MOTORS, INCORPORATED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rebsamen Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 99532. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 44 B.T.A. 36 ; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1393 ; April 3, 1941 , Promulgated *1393 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nnenna Lovette Nkanginieme v. Lovette Appleton

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 7, 2023

    See King Candy Co. v. … .”); Signal Cos. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Child v. United States

    18 Cust. Ct. 11 · United States Customs Court · Jan 9, 1947

    ¡V-15, that 'the 15,041 board feet of lumber made into shifting boards and feeder boxes were built into the hull of the vessel as a permanent installation, as that term may be understood, and that the term “ equipment is … United States, Abstract 41649; United States v. Richard & Co., 8 Ct. Cust. Appls, 231, T. D. 37496; Admiral Oriental Line v. United States, 56 Treas. Dec. 234 , T. D. 43585; Folger v. United States, 2 Treas.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. Slatin

    305 F.2d 891 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 25, 1962

    Levy v. Gould, 87 F.2d 524 , 24 CCPA 910; and Archer v. Papa, 265 F.2d 954 , 46 CCPA 835. … Crane et al. v. Carlson, 29 CCPA 879, 125 F.2d 709 ; Senkus v. Johnston, 35 CCPA 1008, 166 F.2d 597 ; and Jepson v. Egly, 43 CCPA 853, 231 F.2d 947 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Creamer v. United States

    174 Ct. Cl. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

    Misuraca v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 387 , 394 (1956); De Busk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790, 796-97 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 988 (1956); Athinson v. United States, 144 Ct. … Fahey v. Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245, 249-53 (1947); Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742, 784-86 (1948); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 896-97 (1961).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bone v. Commissioner

    52 T.C. 913 · United States Tax Court · Sep 8, 1969

    Bone, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent; Thos. E. Bone, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Bone v. … Code sec. 103 (West 1955); Brown v. North Ventura Road Development Co ., 216 Cal. App. 2d 227 , 30 Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Palacios v. United States

    100 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 7, 2011

    See Henderson v. … Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1303 (Fed.Cir.2003).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Honeywell, Inc.

    532 F.2d 180 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1976

    Best Lock Corp. v. Schlage Lock Co.; 413 F.2d 1195 , 56 CCPA 1472 (1969); In re Deister Concentrator Co., 289 F.2d 496 , 48 CCPA 952 (1961). … However, the board did not consider the transparent disk to be “unclaimed.”

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Tyrrell v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 707 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1936

    Combs, 296 U.S. 365 , reversing 76 Fed.(2d) 682 , which affirmed memorandum decision of this Board; Swanson v. … Commissioner, 296 U.S. 362 , affirming 76 Fed.(2d) 651 , which affirmed memorandum decision of this Board; Commissioner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.

    576 F.2d 926 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 8, 1978

    HyTop Products Division v. … In Maremont Corp. v. Air Lift Co., 463 F.2d 1114 , 59 CCPA 1152, 174 USPQ 395 (1972), and in Baker’s Franchise Corp. v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Veit v. United States

    11 Ct. Cust. 81 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1921

    See Steinhardt & Bro. v. United States ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 62 ; T. D. 37940). The first article is designated by items and numbers 6332, 4219, 4220. … In Cochran & Co. v. United States ( 10 Ct. Cust. Appls., 62 ; T.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United States

    389 F.2d 424 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1968

    Oil Co. v. National Shawmut Bank, 342 Mass. 108 , 172 N.E.2d 104 , 105 n. 1 (1961). See also Scott-Burr Stores Corp. v. … Franklin Co. v. United States, 381 F.2d 416, 419 , 180 Ct.Cl. -, (July 1967). . Blanchard v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Military Aircraft Parts

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 21, 2017

    C, G). 4 This language is substantially the same as the language found in FAR 33 .211 (a)(4)(v ), which implements the CDA' s requirement to inform a contractor of its appeal rights, and lists the specific information that … Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60139, Appeal of Military Aircraft Parts, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Feigelman

    455 F.2d 596 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 24, 1972

    Sloan v. Peterson, supra note 3. Accordingly, it is an issue which should have been considered independently by the board. … While we undoubtedly have the power to proceed on our own and decide questions not reached by the board which become relevant only because we have reversed the board on questions which they did reach, Sloan v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • 09-35 173

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

    Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). The Board will proceed with the adjudication of this appeal. … The Board notes that the Veteran is competent to give evidence about personally observable symptoms, such as joint pain. Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.