Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.54s
168 Ct. Cl. 219 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964
McEaddy v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 311, 313 (1961). See also Patten v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 131, 135 (1963); Gordon v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 740 (1963); Johnston v. … Nichols v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 412, 415 (1962); Hendrick v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 437, 445 (1960).
Cited 25 timesPublishedOne Jeanswear Group Inc. v. YogaGlo, Inc.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 7, 2018
v. YogaGlo, Inc. M. … See Dating DNA LLC v. Imagini Holdings Ltd., 94 USPQ2d 1889, 1893 (TTAB 2010). The Board file will be maintained in Opposition No. 91235392 as the “parent” case.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 Vet. App. 7 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 3, 1991
See Harris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 180 (1991); Hoyer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 208 (1991). … See Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 78 (1990); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2021
See Bouton v. Peake, 23 Vet. App. 70, 71 (2008); Grover v. West, 12 Vet. App. 109, 112 (1999); Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 242, 245 (1994); Russell, 3 Vet. App. at 313-14. … The Board notes that the April 1992 rating decision that addressed tinnitus was conducted prior to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) holding in Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn re Recommendation of Local Advisory Board
169 F.2d 955 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1948
Collins v. Janey, 1923, 147 Tenn. 477 , 249 S.W. 801 . … On June 1, 1948, he issued a “Handbook for Rent Advisory Boards” containing a set of instructions to such boards relating to the performance of their duties.
Cited 4 timesPublishedApplication of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. Fox
347 F.2d 597 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1965
Smith v. Nichols, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 112 , 22 L.Ed. 566 (1874). … D.C. 97 ] 104 F.(2d) 230 ; SherwinWilliams Co. et al. v. Marzall, 1951 C.D. 48, 647 O.G. 328 [ 88 U.S.App.D.C. 374 ] 190 F.(2d) 606 , 89 USPQ 208 ; Mandel Bros., Inc. v. Wallace, 1948 C.
Cited 13 timesPublished36 Fed. Cl. 168 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 20, 1996
See Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994); Sargisson v. … See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285 , 599 F.2d 984 (1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).
Reversed by Roane v. United States, 237 F.3d 1352 (2001)Cited 4 timesPublished69 Fed. Cl. 299 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2006
then concluded that an improperly constituted Board of Inquiry error is not jurisdictional in nature, relying on Wolfe v. … In Evensen [v.
Cited 8 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 1164 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1929
Brown v. Williamson’s Ex’rs., 36 Pa. St. 338, is cited as authority for this position. But it is not, in any essential particular, distinguishable from Ashurst v. Givens, 6 Watts & S. 323 . … Beviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLa Crosse Garment Manufacturing Co. v. The United States
432 F.2d 1377 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1970
Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. United States, supra, 405 F.2d at 1290 , 186 Ct.Cl. at 507 . The Board erred in the standard it utilized in applying the basic rule of liability. … Vann v. United States, 420 F.2d 968, 982 , 190 Ct.Cl. 546, 570-571 (1970); United Contractors v. United States, 368 F.2d 585, 602-603 , 177 Ct.Cl. 151, 173-174 (1966). On such review, my opinion is that the Board erred.
Cited 47 timesPublished560 F.2d 424 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 4, 1977
Decision on the motion was deferred until final hearing, as provided by 37 CFR 1.231(d), 5 in view of the Board of Appeals decision, although the Board of Patent Interferences was not bound thereby. Sze v. … As we noted in Nitz v.
Cited 18 timesPublished228 Ct. Cl. 794 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1981
Ill 1979), of an adverse decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board”) upholding his discharge by the United States General Services Administration. … Coleman v. Department of the Navy, 227 Ct. Cl. 536 (1981).
Cited 3 timesPublished465 F.2d 899 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 14, 1972
Appellees press it upon this court, and having argued it before the board, they may do so without filing a cross-appeal. Myers v. Freigelman, 59 CCPA 834, 455 F.2d 596, 604 , 172 USPQ 580 , 587 (1972); Kratz v. … We do not wish to resolve the issues mentioned above without the benefit of the board’s views thereon, and we accordingly remand the case to the board for a fully focused inquiry. Myers v.
Cited 11 timesPublished4 Ct. Cust. 355 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1913
The opinion of the Board of General Appraisers in this case, is identical with the opinion of the board in that case. The decision of the board reversed the decision of the collector. … The board found as a fact in this case, as in United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished186 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968
See, e.g., Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 365, 370 , 358 F. 2d 951, 953 (1966) ; Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9, 13 (1965) ; finding No. 12 infra. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation v. … Dayley v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 306 , 308 (1965).
Cited 28 timesPublished592 F.2d 1184 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 8, 1979
But nothing else is necessary, for, as this court said in DeWalt, Inc. v. … Goiomb, “Checker Boards and Polyominoes,” American Mathematical Monthly 675 (Dec. 1954). . Golomb v. Wadsworth, 184 USPQ 249 (TTAB 1974) (Opposition No. 53,785, application serial No. 391,735, filed May 11, 1971). .
Cited 4 timesPublished62 T.C. 223 · United States Tax Court · May 15, 1974
We think they realized taxable income under either James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961), as a misappropriation of Beverly’s funds, or North American Oil v. … United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp., 400 U.S. 4, 6 (1970); Brushaber v. Union Pac.
Cited 83 timesPublishedJohn E. Burke v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2014 MSPB 48 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014
See Mullins v. … See Bables v.
Cited 1 timesPublished1 Vet. App. 121 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 1991
Summary affirmance of the Board’s decision on this issue is appropriate. See Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23 (1990). II. The second issue concerns the denial of service connection for the residuals of poliomyelitis. … . 38 U.S.C. § 4052 (b) 1988; see Rogozinski v.
Cited 260 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 755 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 12, 1935
An examination of the facts of record shows that on December 15, 1934, a petition was filed with the Board, captioned “ Samuel J. Weisser, Ethel Weisser, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.” … Weisser and Ethel Weisser v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,” filed December 15, 1934, testified orally at the hearing on respondent’s motion to dismiss.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna