Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.54s

  • Snell v. United States

    168 Ct. Cl. 219 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964

    McEaddy v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 311, 313 (1961). See also Patten v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 131, 135 (1963); Gordon v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 740 (1963); Johnston v. … Nichols v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 412, 415 (1962); Hendrick v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 437, 445 (1960).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • One Jeanswear Group Inc. v. YogaGlo, Inc.

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 7, 2018

    v. YogaGlo, Inc. M. … See Dating DNA LLC v. Imagini Holdings Ltd., 94 USPQ2d 1889, 1893 (TTAB 2010). The Board file will be maintained in Opposition No. 91235392 as the “parent” case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Derwinski

    3 Vet. App. 7 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 3, 1991

    See Harris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 180 (1991); Hoyer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 208 (1991). … See Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 78 (1990); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 200422-75785

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2021

    See Bouton v. Peake, 23 Vet. App. 70, 71 (2008); Grover v. West, 12 Vet. App. 109, 112 (1999); Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 242, 245 (1994); Russell, 3 Vet. App. at 313-14. … The Board notes that the April 1992 rating decision that addressed tinnitus was conducted prior to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) holding in Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re Recommendation of Local Advisory Board

    169 F.2d 955 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1948

    Collins v. Janey, 1923, 147 Tenn. 477 , 249 S.W. 801 . … On June 1, 1948, he issued a “Handbook for Rent Advisory Boards” containing a set of instructions to such boards relating to the performance of their duties.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. Fox

    347 F.2d 597 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1965

    Smith v. Nichols, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 112 , 22 L.Ed. 566 (1874). … D.C. 97 ] 104 F.(2d) 230 ; SherwinWilliams Co. et al. v. Marzall, 1951 C.D. 48, 647 O.G. 328 [ 88 U.S.App.D.C. 374 ] 190 F.(2d) 606 , 89 USPQ 208 ; Mandel Bros., Inc. v. Wallace, 1948 C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Roane v. United States

    36 Fed. Cl. 168 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 20, 1996

    See Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994); Sargisson v. … See Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 285 , 599 F.2d 984 (1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 2961 , 64 L.Ed.2d 837 (1980).

    Reversed by Roane v. United States, 237 F.3d 1352 (2001)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wisotsky v. United States

    69 Fed. Cl. 299 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2006

    then concluded that an improperly constituted Board of Inquiry error is not jurisdictional in nature, relying on Wolfe v. … In Evensen [v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mayer v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 1164 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1929

    Brown v. Williamson’s Ex’rs., 36 Pa. St. 338, is cited as authority for this position. But it is not, in any essential particular, distinguishable from Ashurst v. Givens, 6 Watts & S. 323 . … Beviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • La Crosse Garment Manufacturing Co. v. The United States

    432 F.2d 1377 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1970

    Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. United States, supra, 405 F.2d at 1290 , 186 Ct.Cl. at 507 . The Board erred in the standard it utilized in applying the basic rule of liability. … Vann v. United States, 420 F.2d 968, 982 , 190 Ct.Cl. 546, 570-571 (1970); United Contractors v. United States, 368 F.2d 585, 602-603 , 177 Ct.Cl. 151, 173-174 (1966). On such review, my opinion is that the Board erred.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Squires v. Corbett

    560 F.2d 424 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 4, 1977

    Decision on the motion was deferred until final hearing, as provided by 37 CFR 1.231(d), 5 in view of the Board of Appeals decision, although the Board of Patent Interferences was not bound thereby. Sze v. … As we noted in Nitz v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 794 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1981

    Ill 1979), of an adverse decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board”) upholding his discharge by the United States General Services Administration. … Coleman v. Department of the Navy, 227 Ct. Cl. 536 (1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Snitzer v. Etzel

    465 F.2d 899 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 14, 1972

    Appellees press it upon this court, and having argued it before the board, they may do so without filing a cross-appeal. Myers v. Freigelman, 59 CCPA 834, 455 F.2d 596, 604 , 172 USPQ 580 , 587 (1972); Kratz v. … We do not wish to resolve the issues mentioned above without the benefit of the board’s views thereon, and we accordingly remand the case to the board for a fully focused inquiry. Myers v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Vandegrift

    4 Ct. Cust. 355 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1913

    The opinion of the Board of General Appraisers in this case, is identical with the opinion of the board in that case. The decision of the board reversed the decision of the collector. … The board found as a fact in this case, as in United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Biddle v. United States

    186 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

    See, e.g., Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 365, 370 , 358 F. 2d 951, 953 (1966) ; Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9, 13 (1965) ; finding No. 12 infra. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation v. … Dayley v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 306 , 308 (1965).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Golomb v. Wadsworth

    592 F.2d 1184 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 8, 1979

    But nothing else is necessary, for, as this court said in DeWalt, Inc. v. … Goiomb, “Checker Boards and Polyominoes,” American Mathematical Monthly 675 (Dec. 1954). . Golomb v. Wadsworth, 184 USPQ 249 (TTAB 1974) (Opposition No. 53,785, application serial No. 391,735, filed May 11, 1971). .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Quinn v. Commissioner

    62 T.C. 223 · United States Tax Court · May 15, 1974

    We think they realized taxable income under either James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961), as a misappropriation of Beverly’s funds, or North American Oil v. … United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp., 400 U.S. 4, 6 (1970); Brushaber v. Union Pac.

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • John E. Burke v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2014 MSPB 48 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014

    See Mullins v. … See Bables v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Green v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 121 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 1991

    Summary affirmance of the Board’s decision on this issue is appropriate. See Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23 (1990). II. The second issue concerns the denial of service connection for the residuals of poliomyelitis. … . 38 U.S.C. § 4052 (b) 1988; see Rogozinski v.

    Cited 260 timesPublished
  • Weisser v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 755 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 12, 1935

    An examination of the facts of record shows that on December 15, 1934, a petition was filed with the Board, captioned “ Samuel J. Weisser, Ethel Weisser, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.” … Weisser and Ethel Weisser v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,” filed December 15, 1934, testified orally at the hearing on respondent’s motion to dismiss.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.