Case law

10-49 606

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995).

Biddle v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

See, e.g., Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 365, 370 , 358 F. 2d 951, 953 (1966) ; Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9, 13 (1965) ; finding No. 12 infra. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation v. … Dayley v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 306 , 308 (1965).

The Jack Stone Company, Inc. v. The United States

344 F.2d 370 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

Kaiser Industries Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 340 F.2d 322 , p. *375 329, decided Jan. 22, 1965; Pfotzer v. … Farwell Co. v. United States, 148 F.Supp. 947 , 137 Ct.Cl. 832 (1957); Henry Spen & Co. v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 407 , 139 Ct. Ct. 613 (1957); Octagon Process, Inc. v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 599, 604 (1958).

Green v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 121 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 1991

Summary affirmance of the Board’s decision on this issue is appropriate. See Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23 (1990). II. The second issue concerns the denial of service connection for the residuals of poliomyelitis. … . 38 U.S.C. § 4052 (b) 1988; see Rogozinski v.

James A. Beckham v. The United States

392 F.2d 619 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

Needless to say, this is not the law; the Navy Board, like other administrative bodies, is bound by its own regulations. See, Hamlin v. … In Grubin v.

Weisser v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 755 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 12, 1935

An examination of the facts of record shows that on December 15, 1934, a petition was filed with the Board, captioned “ Samuel J. Weisser, Ethel Weisser, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.” … Weisser and Ethel Weisser v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,” filed December 15, 1934, testified orally at the hearing on respondent’s motion to dismiss.

Norman v. United States

392 F.2d 255 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

See, e.g., Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 584-585 ; FCC v. RCA Communications, Inc. 346 U.S. 86 ; Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 ; Yakus v. United States, supra, 321 U.S. at 424; Bandini Petroleum Co. v. … Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393, 401 (1961) ; Cf. Leonard v. United States, 279 U.S. 40 (1929) ; United States v. McDonald, 128 U.S. 471 (1888) ; Byrd v. United States, 103 Ct. Cl. 285 (1945) ; Amchanitzky v.

Cooper v. United States

203 Ct. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973

There is a strong presumption that the board and the Secretary faithfully discharged their duties and the burden is upon plaintiff to prove otherwise. Callan v. United States, 196 Ct. … Cl. 392 , 450 F. 2d 1121 *305 (1971); Biddle v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 87 (1968). Plaintiff sought to meet that burden by complaints of irregularities in the actions of the board.

07-21 059

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

. § 1154(b); Collette v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (Fed. Cir. 1996). … See Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 521, 522-23 (1996).

Sandoz Chemical Works v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 512 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 17, 1925

Sec. 501. * * * Every such application shall be assigned by'the Board of General Appraisers to a board of three general appraisers, who shall consider the case upon the samples of the merchandise, if there be any, and the … (Inc.) v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 261 ; T. D. 40269).

13-02 536

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

Baker v. West, 11 Vet. App. 163 (1998); Hayes v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 67 (1996). This duty to assist applies only to relevant SSA records. Golz v. Shinseki, 590 F.3d 1317 (Fed. … The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment.

Mymeta Software, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Apr 24, 2024

See UMG Recordings, Inc. v. O’Rourke, 92 USPQ2d 1042, 1043-44 (TTAB 2009). We note the Board has long allowed amendments under Fed. R. Civ. … Co. v.

Woolworth Co. v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 81 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1926

June 1, 1925, United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607 . In Klein, Messner & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 273 , T. … Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U. S. 425 ; Chicago, etc., Ry. Co. v. Hackett, 228 U. S. 559, 566 .

14-18 563

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995) (en banc). … See Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 40, 43 (1993).

Gerald W. Monett v. The United States

419 F.2d 434 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

But plaintiff maintains that his agreement must be construed in the light of three prior Board of Review decisions (United States v. Renner, CM 393739, January 10, 1957 (unpublished); United States v. … It is on this point that the three Board cases are distinguishable. United States v.

Briggs v. Commissioner

72 T.C. 646 · United States Tax Court · Jul 9, 1979

Nevin v. Salk, supra; Cadigan v. American Trust Co., supra. Whether the several writings comprise one transaction is a question of fact. Nevin v. Salk, supra. … Estate of Woodworth v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 193, 196 (1966). See United States v. Provident Trust Co., 291 U.S. 272 (1934).

Bailey Mora Co. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 666 · United States Customs Court · Nov 15, 1968

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finger jointed moldings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Group III Mgt., Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 2, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Thus, the Board will grant summary judgment only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, such that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex Corp. v.

11-27 082

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 5, 2015

See Powell v. West, 13 Vet. App. 31, 34 (1999); Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 417, 421 (1995). As mentioned above, the Board finds that a 20 percent rating is warranted for the Veteran's low back disability. … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 339 (1996). There is a three-step inquiry for determining entitlement to an extraschedular rating. Thun v. Peake, 22 Vet. App, 111 (2008).

10-28 279

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997). An April 2015 rating decision denied entitlement to service connection for tinnitus and hearing loss. … The Board is required to remand, rather than refer, this issue. See Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 238 (1999). The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ).