Case law

Application of Ernst Johan Jens Henriksen

399 F.2d 253 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1968

From as early as Godfrey v. Eames, 68 U.S. 317 , 17 L.Ed. 684 (1863), to Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann Co., 304 U.S. 159 , 58 S.Ct. 842 , 82 L.Ed. 1265 (1938) and General Talking Pictures Corp. v. … Appellant cited Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 249 F.Supp. 809 , 148 USPQ 312 (S.D.Cal.1966); Merck & Co. v. Olin Mathieson Chem. Corp., 253 F.2d 156 (4th Cir. 1958); and Otto v.

Gutterman Strauss Co. v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 243 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 29, 1924

In the case of Green v. … St. 1901, p. 661; Sanies Dental Association v. International Tooth Crown Co., 194 U. S. 303 , 24 Sup. Ct. 700, 48 L. Ed. 989 ; Smith v. International Mercantile Co. (C. C.), 154 Fed. 786 ).

King v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 866 · United States Customs Court · Feb 23, 1967

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finger jointed moldings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Visconi v. United States

98 Fed. Cl. 589 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 20, 2011

Palmer v. … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citation omitted); see also James v.

Benevento v. United States

461 F.2d 1316 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Daniels v. United States, supra; Ayres v. United States, supra; Abbott v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 459, 463 , 151 F. Supp. 929, 932 (1957). … V, 1965-69).

Haselrig v. United States

53 Fed. Cl. 111 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2002

Porter v. … v.

Paul Reed Smith Guitars and The Estate of Theodore M. McCarty v. Gibson Brands, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 29, 2023

Corp. v. Microsoft Corp., 113 USPQ2d 1029, 1039 n.19 (TTAB 2014) (Board may sua sponte dismiss any insufficiently pleaded claim); Musical Directions v. … Decisions whether to sever a claim under Rule 21 are committed to the Board’s wide discretion. See, e.g., Coleman v.

Dravo Corp. v. United States

594 F.2d 842 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1979

Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142, 148 , 405 F.2d 554, 557 (1968). The Board’s findings of fact are presumptively correct. Arundel Corp. v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 84, 99 , 515 F.2d 1116, 1124 (1975). … Since Framlau Corp. v. United States, 215 Ct.

Lemly v. United States

75 F. Supp. 248 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1948

Cook v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 782 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 884 ; Rudd v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 432 ; Hoff *250 man v. United States, 66 Ct.Cl. 452 ; Gay v. … The case of Denby v.

Dzialo v. United States

677 F.2d 873 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1982

McAulay v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 359, 361 , 305 F.2d 836, 839 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 938 (1963); see Warner v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 717 (1980). … Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 19, 24, 35 , 310 F.2d 381, 392, 396, 402 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).

08-08 978

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 17, 2012

Brown, 8 Vet. App. 359, 361 (1995), citing Hauck v. Brown, 6 Vet. … Tablazon v. Brown, 8 Vet.

Helferty v. United States

101 Fed. Cl. 224 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 24, 2011

Id. at 2-3 (citing Flute v. … ); Renicker v.

In re Bergy

563 F.2d 1031 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 6, 1977

Guaranty Trust Co. v. … The decision of the board affirming the rejection of claim 5 is reversed. REVERSED. . Merck & Co. v. Chase Chemical Co., 273 F.Supp. 68 , 155 USPQ 139 (D.N.J.1967); Merck & Co. v.

Cascade Milling & Elevator Co. v. Commissioner

25 B.T.A. 946 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 22, 1932

In Hill v. … The case of Pugmire v. Oregon S. L. R. Co., 92 Pac. 962 ; 13 L. R. A. (N.

Manker v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2025

Power & Light Co. v. … If the Board’s resolution of this issue lacks record support or sufficient clarity, the Court can remand for further proceedings. See Evans v. United States, 129 Fed.

10-28 279

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997). An April 2015 rating decision denied entitlement to service connection for tinnitus and hearing loss. … The Board is required to remand, rather than refer, this issue. See Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 238 (1999). The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ).

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

64 Cust. Ct. 331 · United States Customs Court · Apr 16, 1970

Thus, in Smith v. … But, in this connection, see Brown & Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 415 , T.D. 35977 (1915).

Joshua Domond v. 37.37, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 2, 2015

See Marshall Field & Co. v. Mrs. … Failure to cooperate saddles the Board with needless motions and burdens it with resolving disputes which should be resolved by the parties. See, e.g., Johnston Pump/General Valve Inc. v.

200115-54858

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2020

See Perman v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 237, 241 (1993); Lee v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 336, 338 (1997). Moreover, the U. S. … See Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996).

Timber Access Industries Co. v. United States

553 F.2d 1250 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. United States, supra 170 Ct.Cl. at 695 , 345 F.2d at 811-12 ; Wingate Construction Co. v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 131 (1964); Beacon Construction Co. v. … The Board, finding the appeal untimely, had *661 denied it. We agree with the Board’s result, although reaching the same conclusion, as a matter of law, by a different route. See Federal Electric Corp. v.