Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

3.29s

  • Application of Prutton

    204 F.2d 291 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1953

    District of Columbia [Lubri-Zol Corp. v. … See also Hemphill Co. v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Application of Dwin R. Craig and John N. Street, 411 F.2d 1333 (1969)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Smith v. United States

    67 Ct. Cl. 182 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1929

    In the case of Curtis v. … United States v. Taylor, 104 U. S. 216 ; United States v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 124 ; Rock Island Railroad Co. v. United States, 254 U. S. 141, 143 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • ACEIJAS-QUIROZ

    26 I. & N. Dec. 294 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2014

    Matter of A-A-, 20 I&N Dec. 492, 495 (BIA 1992) (citing INS v. Cardozo-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 431 (1987); INS v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183, 189 (1984)). … Id.; see also United States v. Hunt, 643 F. Supp. 2d 161, 179 (D.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Edward Bent v. Department of State

    2016 MSPB 17 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 1, 2016

    Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643‑44 (Fed. Cir. 1985); Searcy v. Department of Agriculture, 115 M.S.P.R. 260, ¶¶ 12-13 (2010). … As the Supreme Court explained in Irwin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Concrete & Foundation Co. v. United States

    170 Ct. Cl. 470 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

    Construction Co., Inc. v. United States, 157 Ct. … See River Construction Corporation v. United States, supra; also see T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo

    239 F.2d 402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1956

    As to both the board and this court, certain questions which are “ancillary” to priority may also be considered. Patentability is not one of those questions. Hess v. … Sobey v. Holsclaw, 28 App.D.C. 65 ; Mell v. Midgley, 31 App.D.C. 534 ; Lecroix v. Tyberg, 33 App.D.C. 586 ; Slingluff v. Sweet, 45 App.D.C. 302 ; Lynch v. Headley, 52 App. D.C. 269 , 285 F. 1003 ; Melling v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Central Eureka Mining Co. v. United States

    138 F. Supp. 281 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1956

    Regis Paper Company from the imposition on it of War Production Board General Preference Order M-251 (St. Regis Paper Co. v. United *16 States, 110 C. Cls. 271 ; cert. den. 335 U. … S. 815 ), or the losses suffered by landlords who complied with wartime rent control regulations (Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U. S. 503 , Block v. Hirsh, 256 U. S. 135 , Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. American Express Co.

    5 Ct. Cust. 351 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1914

    Oberteuffer v. Robertson ( 116 U. S., 499 ); Robertson v. Frank ( 132 U. S., 17 ); Tilge v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 149 ; T. D. 31676); Stein v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 36 ; T. D. 31007; Stein v. … That such, has been permitted in tax proceedings such as are these, see Taymouth v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • 05-00 673

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

    Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426 (1994). … App. 1 (1998); Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997); Doran v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 283 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Haselrig v. United States

    53 Fed. Cl. 111 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2002

    Porter v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sayar Development Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 17, 2026

    Dixon v. Shinseki, 741 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Official Comm. of the Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, 322 F.3d 147, 167 (2d Cir. 2003)). … United States v. Dunkel, 927 F.2d 955, 956 (7th Cir. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United States

    386 F.2d 855 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1967

    Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. … Where an administrative board has failed to make a relevant finding of fact as to which the evidence is undisputed, this court has made such finding rather than referring the matter to the board. Kraus v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Van Cleave v. United States

    60 Fed. Cl. 291 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 15, 2004

    Christie v. … E.g., Tippett v. United, States, 185 F.3d 1250 (Fed.Cir.1999); Sammt v. United States, 780 F.2d 31 (Fed.Cir.1985). Defendant’s motion to dismiss must be GRANTED. The Clerk will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. No costs. .

    Vacated by Charles Van Cleave v. United States, 402 F.3d 1341 (2005)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bone v. Commissioner

    52 T.C. 913 · United States Tax Court · Sep 8, 1969

    Bone, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent; Thos. E. Bone, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Bone v. … Code sec. 103 (West 1955); Brown v. North Ventura Road Development Co ., 216 Cal. App. 2d 227 , 30 Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Semar v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 994 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 24, 1933

    And the date of acquisition taken is that when the equitable interest arises and not when the legal title is transferred, Guye v. Guye, supra; Ahern v. Ahern, 71 Pac. 1023 (Washington); Forker v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment wül he entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adkins v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 909 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1981

    Deering v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 342, 351, n.3 , 620 F.2d 242 , 246 n.3 (en banc 1980); Plant v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 582 (1980); Frommhagen v. United States, 216 Ct. … Gentry, v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 654 (1980). Moreover, even at the correction board level there was prejudice to defendant.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Milas v. United States

    42 Fed. Cl. 704 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 20, 1999

    See Black v. … See Wills v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • 10-27 781

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

    See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990). The preponderance of the evidence must be against the claim for benefits to be denied. See Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). … The Board finds the lay evidence of record, including the Veteran's hearing testimony, to be both competent and credible. Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994); Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303, 308 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Darrow v. Derwinski

    2 Vet. App. 303 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 17, 1992

    Darrow, appeals an August 15, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision. … Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 830 , 105 S.Ct. 1649, 1655 , 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985). See also Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 599 , 108 S.Ct. 2047, 2051-52 , 100 L.Ed.2d 632 (1988). Cf. Service v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Weil v. Fritz

    572 F.2d 856 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 26, 1978

    Finally, Fritz argues that the board’s decision is supported by Squires v. … Accord, Martin v. Johnson, supra, cited by the board.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.