Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.30s

  • Bailey v. United States

    40 Fed. Cl. 449 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 10, 1998

    Moreover, a waiver of the traditional sovereign immunity “cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” United States v. … To establish a claim upon which relief can be granted, a plaintiff must allege the elements necessary to establish the existence of an express contract or an implied-in-fact contract. Trauma Serv. Group v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Delverde, SrL v. United States

    21 Ct. Int'l Trade 1294 · United States Court of International Trade · Dec 2, 1997

    The documentation for the argument that Congress had clearly intended this provision to cover all changes in ownership, privatizations and otherwise, is equally unhelpful. … Law 46 grants are based on an amount not to exceed 50 percent of the loan the firm would have qualified for. Borden's Petition (May 12,1995), at 42-43, Ex. 10, C.R.

    Vacated on other grounds by Delverde, Srl and Delverde Usa, Inc. v. United States v. Borden, Inc., Hershey Foods Corp. And Gooch Foods, Inc., 202 F.3d 1360 (2000)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Four Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United States

    77 Fed. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2007

    However, plaintiff bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction, Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.1998) (citing McNutt v. Gen. … The court agrees that plaintiff has not established a valid jurisdictional basis for its challenge to the tax lien-related collections by the IRS, as more fully explained below.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Fiorentino v. United States

    607 F.2d 963 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

    It purports to "establish a departmental policy on the acquisition of permanent tenure by attorneys.” It tells how an attorney can by length of service acquire "permanent tenure.” … The question of sovereign immunity entered strongly into this and justified a difference from the case of discrimination by a private employer.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • City of Wilmington, Delaware v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2021

    PX 1, a DNREC-issued Water Quality Certificate, clearly identifies DNREC’s action – permitting the Army Corps of Engineers to dredge the federal properties subject to certain conditions – and the government does not contest … Third, although the portions of PX 4 that Wilmington now seeks to admit, see supra n. 3, may not qualify as a public record, what remains at issue is a series of documents that the Army Corps of Engineers submitted to DNREC

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Avedon Corp. v. United States

    35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,592 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1988

    The only mention of fireproofing was in detail D/A12, which clearly did not apply to all the structural steel. … Yet plaintiff would have the court believe that it, a qualified or at least somewhat experienced contractor, would actually plan to deliver unprotected steel to the site.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Authority of the Department of Defense to Use Appropriations for Travel by Service Members and Dependents to Obtain Abortions

    Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Oct 3, 2022

    that the prohibition on expending funds “for any abortion” is limited to the direct provision of abortions and would not apply to trans- portation. 2 More generally, the amendment suggests that when Congress has wanted to clearly … You have repre- sented that “DoD also has an important interest in recruiting and main- taining the most qualified Service members.” DoD Memo at 8.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Metters Industries, Inc. v. United States

    109 Fed. Cl. 444 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2013

    But Metters cites the SBA regulation which provides that “[a] concern that qualified as a small business at the time it receives a contract is considered a small business throughout the life of that contract,” 13 C.F.R. § … Clearly, the plaintiff has proven it would suffer irreparable injury if the agency were not enjoined and the task order were awarded to another offeror.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schubel v. Commissioner

    77 T.C. 701 · United States Tax Court · Sep 28, 1981

    The 2-percent discount fee is an established practice in the Tampa area and is the amount generally charged in that area. … L. 94-455, 90 Stat. 1520, 1541), considerable confusion surrounded the deductibility of prepaid interest and a case-by-case analysis, to determine whether the deduction of prepaid interest materially distorted or clearly

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Pastene v. Commissioner

    52 T.C. 647 · United States Tax Court · Jul 22, 1969

    The only established liabilities of Norwich as of October 31, 1964, were as follows: FICA taxes $ 32.80 Accounting fees 174.00 Legal fees 1,036.25 Total 1,243.05 Norwich filed Treasury Form 966, Return of Information, to … The record contains the following documents: Minutes of *654 a meeting of the directors of Norwich dated November 1, 1963, which clearly outline a plan for complete liquidation to be completed no later than October 30, 1964

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dove v. United States

    161 Ct. Cl. 768 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1963

    It is the determination of the Board that it is not established that Mr. … It is the determination of the Board that it is not established that Mr.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • N-J-B

    22 I. & N. Dec. 1057 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

    I am remanding the case to the BIA to determine whether the respondent is clearly ineligible for relief under NACARA. … This dissatisfaction evidently led Congress to direct that the accrual of qualifying time would stop with the issuance of the notice to appear. See H.R. Rep.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • A-A

    20 I. & N. Dec. 492 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1992

    . § 208.14(c)(1) (1991) from qualifying for asylum as provided in section 208(a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (1988). … Moreover, had Congress intended to give the definitional provision of section 7342 of the 1988 Act a similar prospective application, it clearly knew how to do so, and could have readily done, had it so desired.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • George D. Prewitt, Jr. v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 5, 2022

    Stern, supra at 1062; accord id. at 1062 ("Deciding whom to prosecute, what taxes to assess, what grants to disburse, which veterans qualify for benefits—these, and perhaps most, decisions of the executive require applying … One Representative supported the compromise bill to "guarantee the veteran actual judicial review of all VA decisions" and guarantee accountability in that the "Constitution clearly defined the role of the three branches

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United States

    108 Fed. Cl. 162 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 5, 2012

    court’s discussion of the “otherwise in privity” factors in a section titled “Intent of the Parties”); Lockheed Martin I, 50 Fed.Cl. at 566 (“[For] the central Johnson Controls analysis[,] [because waivers of sovereign immunity … Thus, the second “otherwise in privity” factor does not clearly weigh against plaintiffs’ allegation that GIT and the United States are in privity.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warrior Service Company, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 2020

    “To be eligible for award, an offeror must be rated no less than SATISFACTORY based on established evaluation criteria in the non-price factors.” … In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the contracting officer shall make a determination of nonresponsibility.” FAR 9.103(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cook v. United States

    32 Fed. Cl. 170 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1994

    [T]o be valid, exemptions to tax laws should be clearly expressed.” Capoeman, 351 U.S. at 6 , 76 S.Ct. at 615 . … However, plaintiffs do not qualify for this exemption because 1) they are neither an Indian tribal government nor a subdivision thereof, 2) the sale of fuel by plaintiffs did not involve a State or a political subdivision

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Standard Oil Co. v. Commissioner

    68 T.C. 325 · United States Tax Court · Jun 7, 1977

    Respondent’s position with respect to each of the 20 wells in question is that petitioner has not satisfied its burden of establishing that the expenditures come within the option provided by section 263(c), 7 I.R.C. 1954 … Similarly, any deduction for the cost of dry holes might be postponed until the property is disposed of or abandoned, clearly contrary to prevailing practice.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Stearns Co. v. United States

    53 Fed. Cl. 446 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 2002

    Although the government has not shown that Stearns’ rights, as established by the 1937 deed, were invalid, it suggests that at some point those rights ceased to exist, notwithstanding the fact that they were clearly preserved … Those rales clearly contemplated mining.

    Reversed on other grounds by The Stearns Company, Ltd. v. United States, 396 F.3d 1354 (2005)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Southern California Edison Co. v. Commissioner

    19 T.C. 935 · United States Tax Court · Mar 4, 1953

    If, in order to qualify under (b) (2), it establishes that the increase in sales to others after the cities’ shift to Boulder power was merely a replacement of the cities’ business and that it therefore satisfies the “temporary … In this, we consider petitioner to be clearly wrong, because it seeks improperly to go beyond the base period in ascertaining normal earnings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.