Case law

In re Bergy

563 F.2d 1031 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 6, 1977

Guaranty Trust Co. v. … The decision of the board affirming the rejection of claim 5 is reversed. REVERSED. . Merck & Co. v. Chase Chemical Co., 273 F.Supp. 68 , 155 USPQ 139 (D.N.J.1967); Merck & Co. v.

07-35 259

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

Hatlestad v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 524, 529 (1993). … See 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.341, 4.16, 4.19 (2015); Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361 (1993).

United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.

13 Ct. Cust. 569 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1926

The case of United States v. … We have in mind also, and bave given consideration to, the applicability of American Exfress Co. v. United States, 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 312 .

Whittaker Corporation v. The United States

443 F.2d 1373 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1971

In the Board’s view, these made no difference. 27 . Cf. Ray D. Bolander Co. v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 398, 405, 415 (1968). 28 . … Since much of the Board record (including all oral testimony) antedates United States v.

Stacey M Logan v. Department of Homeland Security

2025 MSPB 4 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 14, 2025

Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983); Moulton v. Office of Personnel Management, 2023 MSPB 26, ¶ 17. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United States

408 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

Jungersen v. Baden, 69 F. Supp. *331 922, 928 , 72 USPQ 426, 431 (D.C. S.D. … Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 468 , 474, 348 F. 2d 949 , 953, 146 USPQ 404, 407 (1965); Dix-Seal Corp. v. Nero Haven Trap Rock Co., 236 F.

Weiner v. United States

148 Ct. Cl. 445 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

In July 1955 this court decided in Updike v. United States, 132 C. … On July 12, 1955, the Court of Claims decided Updike v. United States, 132 C.

McBride v. Teeple

109 F.2d 789 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 26, 1940

In the case of Robins v. … With reference to the case of Wiley v.

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

64 Cust. Ct. 331 · United States Customs Court · Apr 16, 1970

Thus, in Smith v. … But, in this connection, see Brown & Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 415 , T.D. 35977 (1915).

Tombigbee Constructors v. The United States

420 F.2d 1037 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1970

The holding is within the doctrine of Natus Corp. v. United States, 371 F.2d 450 , 178 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967) and Clark Grave Vault Co. v. United States, 371 F.2d 459 , 178 Ct.Cl. 52 (1967). … Koppers Co. v. United States, 405 F.2d 554, 558-559 , 186 Ct.Cl. 142, 150-151 (1968). To the extent that the conclusion of the Board was a matter of law (see Natus Corp. v. United States, supra; Clark Grave Vault Co. v.

United States v. Gandolfi

12 Ct. Cust. 455 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 3, 1925

In National Hat Pin Co. v. United States ( 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 435 ; T. … In United States v. Straus & Sons ( 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 147, 149 ; T.

United States v. Vandegrift

4 Ct. Cust. 355 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1913

The opinion of the Board of General Appraisers in this case, is identical with the opinion of the board in that case. The decision of the board reversed the decision of the collector. … The board found as a fact in this case, as in United States v.

Bowman v. United States

142 Ct. Cl. 367 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

Cls. 135 ; Furlong v. United States, 138 C. Cls. 843 ; Wales v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 765 ; Prichard v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 212 . … Absent an allegation and proof of arbitrary action, plaintiff is bound by the approved decision of that board. Wales v. United States, supra; Gordon v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 270 ; Woodford v. United States, 138 C.

Mullen v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 578 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 4, 1989

In Mulvaney v. … Circuit in Baxter v.

191220-52328

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2020

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … CATINO Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board A. Goreham The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

American Construction Co. v. United States

107 F. Supp. 858 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1952

Until the Board had taken final action plaintiff as a matter of law could not have filed suit in this court. Richardson v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 695, 701 . … Stallman v. United States, supra. “It was certainly never intended that claimants should, either in person or by representatives, attend upon the [Board] and await [its] disposition of their claims.” United States v.

United States v. Sheldon

13 Ct. Cust. 53 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1925

Again, in Wanamaker v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. … United States v. Lee & Co., 9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 111 . *57 It follows that there were not facts sufficient before the Board of General Appraisers to support its judgment, and it is therefore reversed.

CACI International, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 10, 2026

Dixon v. Shinseki, 741 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Official Comm. of the Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, 322 F.3d 147, 167 (2d Cir. 2003)). … Glass v. United States, 258 F.3d 1349, 1354, opinion amended on reh’g on unrelated grounds, 273 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Hollowform, Inc. v. Aeh

515 F.2d 1174 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1975

Vandenburgh, Trademark Law and Procedure § 10.34(b) at 407 (2d ed. 1968), citing Aeronautical Electronics, Inc. v. … American Novawood Corp. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc., 426 F.2d 823 , 57 CCPA 1276 (1970); 1 J. McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 20.2B (1973).

Jeun v. United States

128 Fed. Cl. 203 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2016

11 board . . . .” … a disability board prior to discharge.”