Case law

Whether the Food and Drug Administration Has Jurisdiction over Articles Intended for Use in Lawful Executions

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · May 3, 2019

See FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 137–39 (2000). … See Sottera, 627 F.3d at 896 (interpreting Brown & Williamson); see also Massachusetts v.

10-19 537

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

. § 3.310 (2014); Allen v. Brown, 1 Vet. … The Board also considered whether service connection was warranted with proof of direct causation. Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Ramey v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 40, 44 (1996), aff'd sub nom.

Reappointment of a Member of the National Credit Union Administration Board

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Dec 10, 2021

The question arises from the pending nomination of the incumbent Board Chairman, Todd Harper, for reappointment as a member of the Board. 1 Chairman Harper was first appointed by the President as a member of the Board on … O.L.C. 291, 292 (2004) (“Civil Rights Commission”) (quoting United States v. Wilson, 290 F.3d 347, 353 (D.C. Cir. 2002)).

Lumber Liquidators Services, LLC v. Columbia Insurance Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 10, 2022

As the Board explained in KID-Systeme GmbH v. … Inc. v. Chengdu Westhouse Interactive Entm’t.

Samho Enterprise

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 13, 2025

Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Dalton, 126 F.3d 1442, 1447-48 (Fed. … In ECC Int’l Constructors, LLC v.

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States

511 F.2d 529 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1976

In Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co. v. United States, 179 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 204 Ct.

Joshua R. Marcantel v. Department of Energy

2014 MSPB 50 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 15, 2014

Alonzo v. Department of the Air Force, 4 M.S.P.R. 180, 184 (1980). … FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________ William D. Spencer Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.

Adams v. United States

126 Fed. Cl. 645 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 9, 2016

Jordan Pond Co., LLC v. United States, 115 Fed. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). The court is limited to a review of the record that was before the corrections board. Metz v.

US Pan American Solutions, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 6, 2025

Dixon v. Shinseki, 741 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014). Here, USPAS has not presented any new evidence demonstrating that the time period was extended. … Corp. v. United States, 4 F.3d 961, 963 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (discussing the exclusion of weekends and federal holidays as the end point in computing timely filings).

B. Altman & Co. v. United States

13 Cust. Ct. 56 · United States Customs Court · Jul 22, 1944

retained by the board among the files of the case, but at the trial before the board they were not competent evidence of the facts stated in them. … This statement finds no contradiction in our decision in United States v. Borgfeldt & Co. ( 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 129 ; T. D. 38934) which is relied upon by the importers.

KERBAUCH v. COMMISSIONER

29 B.T.A. 1014 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 6, 1934

The Circuit Court of Appeals, in Budd v. … Rea Gano, 19 B.T.A. 518 ; Budd v. Commissioner, supra.

United States v. Rothschild

3 Ct. Cust. 251 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 17, 1912

De Vries, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal brings here for consideration a question of practice by a board of three general appraisers sitting as a classification board. ■ The procedure of the board, … Customs administrative law (sec. 12); Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co. ( 170 U. S., 675, 680 ); International Trust Co. v. Weeks ( 193 U. S., 667 ); Van Stone and Stillwell v. Bierce Manufacturing Co. ( 142 U.

Allard Nazarian Group, Inc. dba Granite State Manufacturing

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 12, 2024

Roger V. Abbott, Esq. Miles & Stockbridge P.C. Washington, D.C. … conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Trent D. Engler v. Department of the Army

2014 MSPB 71 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 3, 2014

ANALYSIS ¶6 The Board has jurisdiction over appeals only from the types of agency actions specifically enumerated by law, rule, or regulation. Perez v. … Abbott v. U.S. Postal Service, 121 M.S.P.R. 294, ¶ 6 (2014); Yarnell v. Department of Transportation, 109 M.S.P.R. 416, ¶ 10 (2008).

National Starch & Chemical Corp. v. Commissioner

93 T.C. 67 · United States Tax Court · Jul 24, 1989

Brown , for the petitioner. Richard J. Sapinski , Daniel Morman , Paul J. Sude , and Janet A. Engel , for the respondent. Clapp , Judge . … First, "when a board addresses a pending takeover bid it has an obligation to determine whether the offer is in the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders." Unocal Corp. v.

United States v. Lun Chong

3 Ct. Cust. 468 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 16, 1912

Under rule 34 of the board it is incumbent upon a party, desiring to have the testimony of a case previously decided considered, to proceed by motion. See United States v. Oberle ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 527 ; T. … See Shallus v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 52 ; T. D. 32347).

Golden Gate Salami Company v. Gulf States Paper Corporation

332 F.2d 184 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1964

Co. v. Birnbaum, 102 USPQ 38 (Comr., 1954); Pease Woodwork Company, Inc. v. Ready Hung Door Company, Inc., 103 USPQ 240 (Comr., 1954); Feldman v. … See Gillette Co. v. Kempel, 254 F.2d 402 , 45 CCPA 920; Roger & Gallet v.

Application of George J. Handel, Jr

312 F.2d 943 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 13, 1963

Parker & Whipple Company v. Yale Clock Company, 123 U.S. 87 , 8 S.Ct. 38 , 31 L.Ed. 100 ; 41 OG 811; 1887 CD 584. … The cases relied on by the board, United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation, 315 U.S. 668 , 62 S.Ct. 839 , 86 L.Ed. 1105 , and Parker and Whipple Company v.

BCM Corp. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,110 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1983

The Board’s opinion does not set forth the law or otherwise state the contracting officer’s duty to verify a bid. In addition to Framlau, the cases that the Board cited on the issue, Gresham & Co. v. … Aydin Corp. v.

Beamish v. United States

128 F. Supp. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

after careful consideration of the proceedings of the board and plaintiff’s rebuttal statement, the findings of the board were approved by direction of the Secretary of the Army. … The facts in this case closely parallel those in the case of Holliday v. United States, 128 C.