Case law

Michael Levinson v. Social Security Administration

2023 MSPB 20 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 12, 2023

Rather, it concerns the scope of appropriate relief when the Board reverses an agency’s action. Cloude v. … The Board may rely on a prior reprimand as past discipline. See, e.g., Byers v.

Mountain Gateway Order, Inc. v. Virginia Community College System

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2024

In doing so, Applicant relies on similarities between district court and Board proceedings. 4 TTABVUE 9 (citing Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. S.C. … Inc. v.

Bernard G. Browning v. The United States

373 F.2d 915 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

Keener v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 334, 339 (1964). … Zachry Co. v. United States, 344 F.2d 352 , 170 Ct.Cl. 115 (1965).

10-40 439

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38-39 (1993). … For these reasons, the Board finds that the criteria for referral for extraschedular rating have not been met. See Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 96 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet.

King v. Commissioner

47 B.T.A. 840 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1942

Brown v. Brown, 156 Tenn. 619 ; 4 S. W. (2d) 345 ; Williams v. Williams, 146 Tenn. 38 ; 236 S. W. 938 ; Winslow v. Winslow, 133 Tenn. 663 , 182 S. W. 241 . … Brown v. Brown, supra.

Otto Roth & Co. v. Universal Foods Corp.

640 F.2d 1317 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 5, 1981

American Novawood Corp. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc., 57 CCPA 1276, 1282, 426 F.2d 23, 828 , 165 USPQ 613 , 616 (1970). See American Security Bank v. … Co. v. JFD Electronics Components Corp., 565 F.2d 683, 685 , 196 USPQ 1, 2 (CCPA 1977); Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co., 473 F.2d 901, 902 , 177 USPQ 76, 77 (CCPA 1973); Vornado, Inc. v.

GADDA

23 I. & N. Dec. 645 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2003

See Duquesne Light Co. v. … See Waters v.

Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024

Rogers, V, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. … rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

09-00 805

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 12, 2011

See Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 389, 395 (1996); Dizoglio v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 163, 166 (1996). … See West (Carlton) v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 70, 76 (1994); Zarycki v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 91, 98 (1993).

Samho Enterprise

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 13, 2025

Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Dalton, 126 F.3d 1442, 1447-48 (Fed. … In ECC Int’l Constructors, LLC v.

Sabritas, S.A. de C.V. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 59 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 20, 1998

Brown testified, the post-bakingprocess of frying does not affect the use of taco shells as bread. … Robert Brown] Yes, I do. Q Can you tell us what that definition is?

Flynn v. Commissioner

35 B.T.A. 1064 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1937

It has been held that this Board is not obligated to accept opinion evidence as to value: Tracy v. Commissioner, 53 Fed. (2d) 575; Uncasville Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 55 Fed. (2d) 893. … A. 164; John Crosby Brown, 21 B. T. A. 176; William E. Steinback, 30 B. T. A. 1252; Gowen v. Commissioner, 65 Fed. (2d) 923, affirming 24 B. T. A. 1028; Sacks v. Commissioner, 66 Fed. (2d) 308, affirming 25 B. T.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 14, 2017

On 18 October 201 7, the Board reinstated the appeals to its docket. … Dated: 14 November 2017 JO ~v~ J:rir?

191216-51408

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2020

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … GUNN Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Denise Adams Hill, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

210507-158514

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 30, 2021

See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 261-62 (1994). … See Jones v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 137-138 (1994).

Miller v. United States

119 Fed. Cl. 717 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2015

Plaintiff’s burden is to show by “‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’” that the decision of the board fails this standard. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. … Plaintiff must also overcome the presumption of regularity which attaches to the actions of the board. See, e.g., Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed.

Williams v. Administrator of the National Aeronautics & Space Administration

463 F.2d 1391 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 10, 1972

Larsen v. Marz all, 195 F.2d 200 , 92 USPQ 306 (D.C. Cir. 1952); Farrand Optical Co. v. United States, 325 F.2d 328 , 139 USPQ 249 (2 Cir. 1963); Goodrich v. Harmsen, 58 CCPA 1144, 442 F.2d 377 , 169 USPQ 553 (1971). … We thus disagree with the position taken by the board in Rosen v. Administrator, 152 USPQ 757 (Bd. Pat.

Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo

239 F.2d 402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1956

As to both the board and this court, certain questions which are “ancillary” to priority may also be considered. Patentability is not one of those questions. Hess v. … Sobey v. Holsclaw, 28 App.D.C. 65 ; Mell v. Midgley, 31 App.D.C. 534 ; Lecroix v. Tyberg, 33 App.D.C. 586 ; Slingluff v. Sweet, 45 App.D.C. 302 ; Lynch v. Headley, 52 App. D.C. 269 , 285 F. 1003 ; Melling v.

Workmen's Compensation Compromises

38 Pa. D. & C. 372 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 10, 1940

It is to be noted that section 503 states that the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the Department of Labor and Industry “may” approve compromise settlements, and that there is no requirement upon the board to approve. … After the decision in Rich Hill Co. et al. v.

09-20 393

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

In so finding, the Board notes that service connection may not be based on speculation or remote possibility. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.102; Obert v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 30, 33 (1993); Tirpak v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … App. 609, 611 (1992); see also Davis v. West, 13 Vet. App. 178, 185 (1999); Bostain v. West, 11 Vet. App. 124, 127-28 (1998); Beausoleil v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 459, 463 (1996).