Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.90s

  • DoorDash, Inc. v. Greenerside Holdings, LLC

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 23, 2024

    No. 91267988, 2022 TTAB LEXIS at *12-14 (TTAB 2022) (on its own initiative, Board struck applicant’s first affirmative defense and reservation of rights defense); Order of Sons of Italy in Am. v. … Time Warner Entm’t Co. v. Jones, Opp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 09-13 573

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2014

    Smith v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 40 (2010); Paulson v. Brown, 7 Vet. … Charles v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 370 (2002); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ray v. United States

    453 F.2d 754 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1972

    There can be and is no question that the correction of a record to show a retirement for disability, in order to secure tax exemption, is within Board jurisdiction. Prince v. United States, supra. … Another is Egan v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 1 , 158 F. Supp 377 (1958), and we do the same thing again in Bates v. United States, post, at 35, 453 F. 2d 1382 . In Hamrick v. United States, 120 Ct. Cl. 17 , 96 F.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • 10-20 650

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 28, 2012

    DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995). … Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jim Dandy Co. ex rel. Western Grain Co. v. Martha White Foods, Inc.

    458 F.2d 1397 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 11, 1972

    Appellant cites the Wood and Lever cases relied on by the board, as well as. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp. v. General Instrument Corp., 152 USPQ 821 (TTAB 1967), in support of its position. … See Macaulay v. Malt-Diastase, 55 App. D.C. 277 , 4 F. 2d 945 (D.C. Cir. 1925); Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Sears, Roebuch & Co., 18 CCPA 1386, 49 F. 2d 842 , 9 USPQ 524 (1931); Alfred Electronics v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • United States v. Borgfeldt

    13 Ct. Cust. 620 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 15, 1926

    Krusi v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 168 , T. D. 31213; United States v. Perkins, Id. 323, T. D. 31430; Wolff v. United States, 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 11 , T. D. 31572; United States v. … In Illfelder v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 109 , T.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • National Starch & Chemical Corp. v. Commissioner

    93 T.C. 67 · United States Tax Court · Jul 24, 1989

    Brown , for the petitioner. Richard J. Sapinski , Daniel Morman , Paul J. Sude , and Janet A. Engel , for the respondent. Clapp , Judge . … First, "when a board addresses a pending takeover bid it has an obligation to determine whether the offer is in the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders." Unocal Corp. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Haskins v. United States

    51 Fed. Cl. 818 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 13, 2002

    Voge v. … See Hary v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Fifteenth & Chestnut Realty Co. v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 1030 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 6, 1934

    Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, supra; Model Dairy, 13 B.T.A. 545 ; 36 Fed. (2d) 768; Brown & Haley, 21 B.T.A. 752 ; Gould-Mersereau Co., supra. … Commissioner v. Marshall Field, 42 Fed. (2d) 820; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 . Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Reichert v. Commissioner

    19 T.C. 1027 · United States Tax Court · Mar 10, 1953

    Applying the rule laid down in Cohan v. … Brown, the facts are different and we have so found. The first contribution was $5,000 in 1945. Brown’s company was in the wholesale liquor business.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024

    Rogers, V, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. … rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joseph Bell, Sophie Karp, Hyman M. Oberman, Lena Smith, the Rainier Company, Inc., a Dissolved Corporation v. The United States

    404 F.2d 975 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

    Corp. v. … Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 184, 207 (1966). See, also, T. C. Bateson Constr. Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 514, 518 (1960) and River Constr. Corp. v.

    Declined to follow by Dravo Corp. v. United States, 594 F.2d 842 (1979)Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Benson v. United States

    4 Ct. Cust. 467 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 11, 1913

    In Murphy v. Arnson ( 96 U. … In this case there was also a concurring opinion by General Appraiser Somerville, in which he reviewed previous decisions of the courts and board and cited the case of Murphy v. Arnson, supra. The case of Levi v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lengsfield v. Commissioner

    14 T.C.M. 1024 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 1955

    Lengsfield v. Commissioner. Coralie Mayer Lengsfield v. Commissioner. Blanche L. Brown v. Commissioner. Lengsfield v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 49963-49965. United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1955-257 ; 1955 Tax Ct. … Macfarlane, 19 T.C. 9 , with Thomas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kamilah A Jones v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 25, 2024

    Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 10 (citation omitted), aff’d per curiam, 469 F. App’x 852 (Fed. Cir. 2011). … Brown, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 15.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Embossing Co.

    3 Ct. Cust. 220 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 8, 1912

    The decision of the board was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. Gabriel & Schall (suit A2793). … Salomon v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 92 ; T. D. 31635); United States v. Tamm & Co. (2 ibid,, 425; T. D. 32173).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mountain Gateway Order, Inc. v. Virginia Community College System

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2024

    In doing so, Applicant relies on similarities between district court and Board proceedings. 4 TTABVUE 9 (citing Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. S.C. … Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wayne A Lawson v. Social Security Administration

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 7, 2025

    See Cavanagh v. U.S. … See Cavanagh, 44 M.S.P.R. at 489. 6 not equivalent to a dismissal with prejudice.”); contra Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 13-09 118

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

    Id.; AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993). This appeal has primarily been processed utilizing the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS), a paperless, electronic claims processing system. … See Snuffer v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 400 (1997); Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994); VAOPGCPREC 11-95 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tilge v. United States

    3 Ct. Cust. 97 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 26, 1912

    United States v. George Meier (136 Fed. Rep., 764, 765); United States v. Richter ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 167 ; T. D. 31680); Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States ( 171 U. S., 210, 217 ). … The board sustained the collector. In re Tilge (T. D. 19417).

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.