Case law

Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo

239 F.2d 402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1956

As to both the board and this court, certain questions which are “ancillary” to priority may also be considered. Patentability is not one of those questions. Hess v. … Sobey v. Holsclaw, 28 App.D.C. 65 ; Mell v. Midgley, 31 App.D.C. 534 ; Lecroix v. Tyberg, 33 App.D.C. 586 ; Slingluff v. Sweet, 45 App.D.C. 302 ; Lynch v. Headley, 52 App. D.C. 269 , 285 F. 1003 ; Melling v.

Workmen's Compensation Compromises

38 Pa. D. & C. 372 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 10, 1940

It is to be noted that section 503 states that the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the Department of Labor and Industry “may” approve compromise settlements, and that there is no requirement upon the board to approve. … After the decision in Rich Hill Co. et al. v.

09-20 393

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

In so finding, the Board notes that service connection may not be based on speculation or remote possibility. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.102; Obert v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 30, 33 (1993); Tirpak v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … App. 609, 611 (1992); see also Davis v. West, 13 Vet. App. 178, 185 (1999); Bostain v. West, 11 Vet. App. 124, 127-28 (1998); Beausoleil v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 459, 463 (1996).

International Cigar Mach. Co. v. Commissioner

36 B.T.A. 124 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 16, 1937

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

United States v. Rothschild

3 Ct. Cust. 251 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 17, 1912

De Vries, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal brings here for consideration a question of practice by a board of three general appraisers sitting as a classification board. ■ The procedure of the board, … Customs administrative law (sec. 12); Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co. ( 170 U. S., 675, 680 ); International Trust Co. v. Weeks ( 193 U. S., 667 ); Van Stone and Stillwell v. Bierce Manufacturing Co. ( 142 U.

Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter Aumuller

359 F.2d 859 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 28, 1966

As of now, of course, three board opinions are public. See Lilly v. Brenner, discussed infra. November 1964, a Commentary, by Gary A. … Nine years pass without a decision and we then come to Viviani v. Taylor v.

United States v. Murphy

16 Ct. Cust. 461 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

Section 501 of the act provides that the decision of the appraiser, the single general appraiser, or the board of three, as the case may be, shall be final and conclusive upon all parties. … See Carey & Skinner v. United States, T. D. 43118, and United States v. F. D. Vandegrift & Co. et al., T. D. 43120, herein decided November 30, 1928.)

United States v. Heckman

1 Ct. Cust. 272 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 13, 1911

By reference to these decisions and others of the board on the same or similar statutes and relating to similar importations, it is found that they are based upon the holding in United States v. … United States v. Falk ( 204 U. S., 143, 152 ).

United States v. Scanlan

5 Ct. Cust. 290 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1914

D. 31507); Tilge v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 149 ; T. D. 31676); Oelrichs v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 355 ; T. D. 32091); Maddaus v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 330 ; T. D. 32623). … See Beard v. Porter ( 124 U. S., 437 ).

Daine v. Commissioner

9 T.C. 47 · United States Tax Court · Jul 9, 1947

Brown , 7 T. … Burdick v. Commissioner , 76 Fed. (2d) 672 ; Lyeth v.

Michael Levinson v. Social Security Administration

2023 MSPB 20 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 12, 2023

Rather, it concerns the scope of appropriate relief when the Board reverses an agency’s action. Cloude v. … The Board may rely on a prior reprimand as past discipline. See, e.g., Byers v.

10-40 576

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

See Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 458, 461 (1993). In addition, to the extent that the examiner appeared to be looking for a specific event or trauma in service as the cause of the condition, such is not required. … Ashley v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 52, 59 (1993); see also Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 206-207 (1994).

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 507 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

Cls. 178; Kales v. Woodworth, 20 Fed. (2d) 395; Rosetta v. Hauss, 12 B. T. A. 755. … Brown Co., 8 B. T. A. 112; Crown Willamette Paper Co., supra.

James Alfred Martin v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation

422 F.2d 918 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 21, 1970

We are aware that appellant alleges error in the board’s refusal to let appellant, during the appeal period, amend the description of the goods. This, however, is not an appealable matter. 2 . Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. … Gulf States Paper Corp., 150 U.S.P.Q. 700 (TTAB 1966), and Southern Shell Fish Co. v. S. Felicione & Sons Fish Co., 108 U.S.P.Q. 289 (Com’r 1956).

KID-Systeme GmbH v. Türk Hava Yollari Teknik Anonim Sirketi

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 12, 2018

See Blansett Pharmacal Co., Inc. v. Carmrick Labs., Inc., 25 USPQ2d 1473, 1476 (TTAB 1992). … Miscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules of Practice, 81 Fed. Reg. 19296, 19296 (April 4, 2016) (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) (emphasis added); see also Estudi Moline Dissey, S.L. v.

McClurg Family Farm, LLC v. United States

115 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2014

The court of appeals held that the interest so acquired was then transferred by deed to the board. Id. at 209 . … William & James Brown & Co. v. McGran, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 479, 493 , 10 L.Ed. 550 (1840). This principle has been routinely evoked in the context of contract law. See Levy v.

Buch Express, Inc. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 473 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955

See Northern Pump Co. v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. R. Co., 190 I.C.C. 421 , 422; Markstein v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 243 I.C.C. 345 , 348; Linen Thread Co., Inc. v. … Anthony v. Director General, 61 I.C.C. 366 , 368; Simon v. Southern Railway, 102 I.C.C. 326 ; Union Smelting & Refining Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 152 I.C.C. 434 , 436; Lynchburg Iron & Metal Co. v.

Williams v. Administrator of the National Aeronautics & Space Administration

463 F.2d 1391 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 10, 1972

Larsen v. Marz all, 195 F.2d 200 , 92 USPQ 306 (D.C. Cir. 1952); Farrand Optical Co. v. United States, 325 F.2d 328 , 139 USPQ 249 (2 Cir. 1963); Goodrich v. Harmsen, 58 CCPA 1144, 442 F.2d 377 , 169 USPQ 553 (1971). … We thus disagree with the position taken by the board in Rosen v. Administrator, 152 USPQ 757 (Bd. Pat.

William R. Sherwin, D/B/A Sherwin Electric Service v. The United States

436 F.2d 992 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1971

Co. v. United States, 337 F.2d 861 , 162 Ct.Cl. 802 and WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Darrow v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 303 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 17, 1992

Darrow, appeals an August 15, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision. … Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 830 , 105 S.Ct. 1649, 1655 , 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985). See also Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 599 , 108 S.Ct. 2047, 2051-52 , 100 L.Ed.2d 632 (1988). Cf. Service v.