Case law

Berdick v. United States

612 F.2d 533 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 1503 (1976). … Brown v. United States, supra at 788, 524 F.2d at 705 .

Application of William O. Wesseler

367 F.2d 838 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 20, 1966

The board relied on In re Byers, 230 F.2d 451 , 43 CCPA 803, and Shepard v. … The board relied on the Byers, Shepard and Riley cases and added Miller v.

CAYDAM

12 I. & N. Dec. 528 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1967

Johnson v. … Johnson v.

Richey v. United States

44 Fed. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 1999

Our review of the Correction Board’s decision is, at this posture, limited to the administrative record. Long v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 174, 176 (1987); see also, Florida Power & Light Co. v. … Long v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 174, 177 (1987).

07-09 180

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 17, 2012

Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … App. at 111; see also Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 338-9 (1996); Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88, 96 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995).

Cuiffo v. United States

137 F. Supp. 944 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1955

In Moore v. … In Martilla v.

Greenwald v. United States

88 Ct. Cl. 264 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1939

In Holland v. United States, 83 C. … This case is clearly distinguishable from the case of Terry v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 958 .

Connor v. United States

9 Ct. Cust. 312 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 31, 1919

He said that he had never seen a flannel composed of a worsted warp and á wool weft, .and that according to his experience flannels were limited in color to staple blacks, blues, and a few browns. E. M. … decision is based on the record as made, and, because the distinction between fabrics- approximately of the same quality and materials is .sometimes exceedingly fine and difficult to ascertain, as noted by Judge Story in Cary v.

Lawrence Little, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

2017 MSPB 5 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017

See Hamilton v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 75 F.3d 639, 646-47 & n.9 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Saddler v. Department of the Army, 68 F.3d 1357, 1358-59 (Fed. Cir. 1995); Cody v. … See generally Rocha v. Merit Systems Protection Board & Department of State, 688 F.3d 1307 (Fed.

Elizey

618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1979

Ramsey v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1042 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1068 (1979); Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527, 531 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. … See, e.g., Schiffman v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 646 , 319 F.2d 886 (1963); Capps v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 811 , 137 F.Supp. 721 (1956).

Peterson v. United States

292 F.2d 892 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Cl. 1 (1957) and Egan v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 1 (1958). … The first of these decisions is that of Boruski v. United States, C. Cls. No. 417-56, decided October 9,1957. * * * The second decision is the case of Egan v. United States, C. Cls.

Williams Building Company, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 5, 2017

O'CONNELL 0 L:,v"-~~ Administrative Judge Armed Services … Building Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Lichtenwalter v. Caron

158 F.2d 1011 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 7, 1947

In support of its decision, the board cited the decisions of this court in the cases of Collins v. Olsen, 26 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1017, 102 F. (2d) 828, 41 USPQ 220 ; Kear v. Roder, 28 C. C. P. A. … In the case of Kear v.

Gonzales v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 299 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 1, 1907

In the case of the Fannie Brown (30 Fed. … (Clark et al. v. Brig Dodge Healy and Cargo, 4 Wash. C. C., 651 ; The Sailor’s Bride, 1 Brown Adm., 68; Jackson v.

Meyer v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 372 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 2016

See Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1355–57 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Santiago v. United States, 75 Fed. … Verbeck v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 420, 424 (2014) (citing Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Helferty v. United States, 113 Fed.

Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

470 F.2d 1003 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

Findings of fact of a Board are, of course, final and binding in litigation properly before this court even as to the issue of breach of contract, over which the Board has no jurisdiction. United States v. … Plaintiff now objects to the reliance of the Board on these sources, citing Duhame v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 679, 683 , 119 F.

United States v. Sheldon & Co.

5 Ct. Cust. 371 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1914

Bogel v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 144 ; T. D. 21188); Meyer v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 247 ; T. D. 32565). … United States v. Goldberg ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 282 ; T.

Garlejo v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 619 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 22, 1992

The Court’s fourth question asked the Secretary to address the effect of the Board’s failure to rule on the credibility of appellant’s lay evidence as required by Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 24 (1991). … Therefore, absent some showing sufficient to present a well grounded claim based upon unemployability, the issue simply was not before the Board.” Appellee at 8, 9. In Myers v.

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States

639 F.2d 732 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1980

Corp. v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 149 , 535 F. 2d 62 (1976); Specialty Assembling & Packing Co. v. United States, 156 Ct. … Corp. v. United States, supra; Specialty Assembling and Packing Co. v. United States, supra.

E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,659 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1983

See Dravo-Groves v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 371-81C (order of July 16, 1982) and cases cited therein. … See Roubin & Janeiro, Inc. v. United States, 652 F.2d 70 , Ct.Cl. No. 396-80C, pp. 7-8 (order of Mar. 13, 1981).