Case law

Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. v. United States

5 Cust. Ct. 161 · United States Customs Court · Oct 31, 1940

Myers & Co., Inc. v. United States, T. … Myers & Co., Inc. v. United States, T.

Mary A. Abbott v. United States Postal Service

2014 MSPB 47 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014

In Pittman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 832 F.2d 598 , 599–600 (Fed. … . ∗ Subsequently, however, the Board, in several cases beginning with Childers v.

A-B

27 I. & N. Dec. 247 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2018

back to the Board. … Accardi v.

Six v. United States

80 Fed. Cl. 694 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2008

Six II was decided after remand to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR or Board) following this court’s review of a prior decision of the BCNR in Six v. United States (Six I), 71 Fed.Cl. 671 (2006). … Id. at 526 (citing Lamle v. Mattel, Inc., 394 F.3d 1355 , 1359 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.2005); Abbott Labs. v. Syntron Bioresearch, Inc., 334 F.3d 1343, 1355 (Fed.Cir.2003); Corrigan v.

In re Barker

559 F.2d 588 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 21, 1977

Fields v. … The Supreme Court, in Evans v.

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States

528 F.2d 1392 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976

Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 969 (1967); Flippin Materials Co. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 357 , 312 F. 2d 408 (1963); Ozark Dam Constructors v. United States, 153 Ct. … In view of the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963), and United States v.

Kamilah A Jones v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 25, 2024

Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 10 (citation omitted), aff’d per curiam, 469 F. App’x 852 (Fed. Cir. 2011). … Brown, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 15.

Morehouse Manufacturing Corporation v. J. Strickland and Company

407 F.2d 881 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 6, 1969

Directly or indirectly, the board relied on Artichoke Industries, Inc. v. Regina Grape Products Co., 138 USPQ 687 (TTAB 1963); Eastern Metals Research Co. v. … To an even greater extent than in Shoe Corp. of America v.

Sammarco v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 111 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 10, 1991

“[S]trict adherence by the Board to the requirements of 38 U.S.C. § 4004 (d)(1) is required.” Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 59 (1990). … As emphasized in Gilbert v.

Laverne J. Andrusiek v. Cosmic Crusaders LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 14, 2019

Cadbury UK Ltd. v. … Postal Serv. v.

Alvern C. Weed v. Social Security Administration

2016 MSPB 45 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 21, 2016

The Board has interpreted the language of this provision as entitling an appellant to lost wages and benefits as a remedy. See Erickson v. U.S. … The Board may not create new remedies that Congress may have overlooked. King v. Jerome, 42 F.3d 1371, 1375-76 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

PATINO

23 I. & N. Dec. 74 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2001

Concurring Opinion: ROSENBERG, Board Member. MOSCATO, Board Member: The respondent has appealed from an Immigration Judge’s refusal to entertain her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. … See United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481 U.S. 828, 840 (1987); see also Matter of Rodriguez-Diaz, Interim Decision 3431 (BIA 2000).

United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 11

475 F.2d 1204 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1973

Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, v. John B. Connally, et al. (D.D.C.1971) 337 F.Supp. 737, 750 . … University of Southern California v. Cost of Living Council et al. (Em.App., 1972), 472 F.2d 1065 , cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1364 , 35 L.Ed.2d 590 (1973); United States v.

200304-67392

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2020

Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166-67 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 505 (1995). … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994).

Fifth Generation Inc. v. Titomirov Vodka LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 31, 2019

Cir. 2011) (affirming Board’s entry of judgment as a discovery sanction for repeated failures to comply with Board’s reasonable orders), aff’g 96 USPQ2d 1134 (TTAB 2010); MHW Ltd. v. … Benedict’s repeated failures to comply” with Board procedures and orders); SFM, LLC v.

Van Cleave v. United States

66 Fed. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2005

See, e.g., Christie v. … See Pope v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 637, 640 (1989). C. Review of the Correction Board Courts must afford deference to decisions of boards for the correction of military records.

Cappellini v. Commissioner

14 B.T.A. 1269 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 15, 1929

involves a consideration of the power and duties of the Board, for the reason that the section attacked is the one by which petitioners come before the Board. … Reviewed by the Board.

Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United States

386 F.2d 855 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1967

Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. … Where an administrative board has failed to make a relevant finding of fact as to which the evidence is undisputed, this court has made such finding rather than referring the matter to the board. Kraus v.

Mary A. Abbott v. United States Postal Service

2014 MSPB 47 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014

In Pittman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 832 F.2d 598 , 599–600 (Fed. … . ∗ Subsequently, however, the Board, in several cases beginning with Childers v.

Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co. v. United States

499 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

See United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963) ; United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, 384 U.S. 424 (1966) ; United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394 (1966). … The holding In United States v.