Case law

Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner

20 T.C. 1033 · United States Tax Court · Sep 23, 1953

Co. v. Commissioner, 101 F. 2d 75 , and Stockstrom v. Commissioner, 190 F. 2d 283 . In the Balkan Nat. Ins. … In Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , affirming 22 B. T. A. 678, the taxpayer was a general insurance agent and kept books on the accrual basis.

Pruitt v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 83 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 14, 1992

The Board never referred to the veteran’s testimony in its analysis of the evidence. See Cartright v. … O’Hare v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 365 (1991).

R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc.

609 F.2d 1002 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 6, 1979

.] *1005 OPINION The board is, for the most part, correct in its comment that this court will not take jurisdiction over appeals from “non final” board decisions or from interlocutory orders of the board. Toro v. … Unlike the situation in Toro v. Hardigg, the board in the instant case denied a motion for summary judgment.

09-35 735

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 207-08 (1994). … Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). III.

Ringk v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 126 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 3, 1925

In reaching this conclusion the board relied largely upon the supposed authority of the case of Rolland Fréres v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 321 , to which reference will hereinafter be made. … Murphy v. Arnson, 96 U. S. 131 ; Arthur v. Fox, 108 U. S. 125 ; Cone v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 263 ; United States v. Kress & Co., 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 443 .

Pittsburgh Laundry, Inc. v. Commissioner

47 B.T.A. 230 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 30, 1942

With reference to the purchase of stock in the petitioner corporation, the minute book of the board of directors of the petitioner showed as follows: On August 15, 1933, in connection with certain life insurance policies … Brown Shoe Co., 45 B. T. A. 212. A profit was made on resale of petitioner’s own stock. Allen v. National Manufacture & Stores Corporation, 125 Fed. (2d) 239.

Connor v. United States

9 Ct. Cust. 312 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 31, 1919

He said that he had never seen a flannel composed of a worsted warp and á wool weft, .and that according to his experience flannels were limited in color to staple blacks, blues, and a few browns. E. M. … decision is based on the record as made, and, because the distinction between fabrics- approximately of the same quality and materials is .sometimes exceedingly fine and difficult to ascertain, as noted by Judge Story in Cary v.

Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States

459 F.2d 1393 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

In Boeing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 325 F. 2d 885 (9th Cir.1963), and Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate and Film Co. v. … Co. v.

Mountain Gateway Order, Inc. v. Virginia Community College System

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2024

In doing so, Applicant relies on similarities between district court and Board proceedings. 4 TTABVUE 9 (citing Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. S.C. … Inc. v.

Kenneth J. Irwin v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 128 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 20, 2009

Irwin did not file a request for Board reconsideration with the Board within the 120-day period that would abate the finality of the 2007 Board decision. See Linville v. … Clarke v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 130, 133 (2007); see also Jones v.

Wick v. Commissioner

7 T.C. 723 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 1946

Brown, 7 T. C. 715 , and Frank J. Kalchthaler, 7 T. C. 625 . The above holding applies equally to payments made to Margaret Wick during 1943, aggregating $2,298.42. … Gundry v. Gundry (Okla.), 68 Pac. 509, 510 ; Westerfteld v. Westerfield, 36 N. J. Eq. 195, 197. See Words and Phrases, definition and discussion of Alimony Pendente Lite.

Gregory Turner v. U.S. Postal Service

2016 MSPB 35 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 4, 2016

Leseman v. Department of the Army, 122 M.S.P.R. 139, ¶ 6 (2015); Chandler v. Department of the Navy, 87 M.S.P.R. 369, ¶ 6 (2000); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.43(b); see Ahlberg v. … See Russo v.

Cryns v. Musher

161 F.2d 217 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1947

All of the cases relied upon by the board, and the case of Chapman v. … As stated by the Board of Interference Examiners in the case of Thompson v.

Alvern C. Weed v. Social Security Administration

2016 MSPB 45 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 21, 2016

The Board has interpreted the language of this provision as entitling an appellant to lost wages and benefits as a remedy. See Erickson v. U.S. … The Board may not create new remedies that Congress may have overlooked. King v. Jerome, 42 F.3d 1371, 1375-76 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Monifah A. Hamilton v. United States Postal Service

2016 MSPB 22 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 7, 2016

See Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 758 F.2d 641, 643-44 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Law v. U.S. Postal Service, 77 M.S.P.R. 30, 34 (1997) (quoting McCandless v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 996 F.2d 1193, 1199 (Fed.

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United States

408 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

Jungersen v. Baden, 69 F. Supp. *331 922, 928 , 72 USPQ 426, 431 (D.C. S.D. … Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 468 , 474, 348 F. 2d 949 , 953, 146 USPQ 404, 407 (1965); Dix-Seal Corp. v. Nero Haven Trap Rock Co., 236 F.

Nicole D. Wilson v. Department of Homeland Security

2015 MSPB 20 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 24, 2015

Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … . § 44935 note; Conyers v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 388 F.3d 1380, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Brooks v.

V-K

24 I. & N. Dec. 500 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 500 (BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3609 Matter of V-K-, Respondent Decided May 8, 2008 … Dizengoff, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, COLE, and PAULEY, Board Members.

Angrisani v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 439 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Deviny v. Campbell, 194 F. 2d 876, 878 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied 344 U.S. 826 (1952). In Atkinson v. … This court, in Chisholm v.

Stephen M. Rodgers v. Department of the Navy

2015 MSPB 45 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 23, 2015

See Putnam v. … An administrative judge has broad discretion in ruling on discovery matters, and absent an abuse of discretion the Board will not find reversible error in such rulings. Vaughn v.