Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.25s

  • Suter v. United States

    153 F. Supp. 367 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

    Physical Evaluation Board.” … which the plaintiff was and is claiming retirement rights, had been wholly superseded, as of October 1,1949, by the provisions of Title IV of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 ( 63 Stat. 802 ). *470 In the case of Updike v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • J. B. Williams Co. v. United States

    450 F.2d 1379 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971

    and/or 715 CD-V, provided we are the low bidder under this invitation. … See. e.g., Aerodex, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 344 , 350 n. 7, 417 P. 2d 1361 , 1367 n. 7 (1969) ; North American Philips Co. v. United States, 175 Ct.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mountain Gateway Order, Inc. v. Virginia Community College System

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2024

    In doing so, Applicant relies on similarities between district court and Board proceedings. 4 TTABVUE 9 (citing Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. S.C. … Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carlin v. United States

    100 F. Supp. 451 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951

    This board recommended that plaintiff appear before a retiring board. … Lemly v. United States, 75 F.Supp. 248 , 109 Ct.Cl. 760, 763 ; Cook v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 782 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 884 ; Rudd v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 432 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wick v. Commissioner

    7 T.C. 723 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 1946

    Brown, 7 T. C. 715 , and Frank J. Kalchthaler, 7 T. C. 625 . The above holding applies equally to payments made to Margaret Wick during 1943, aggregating $2,298.42. … Gundry v. Gundry (Okla.), 68 Pac. 509, 510 ; Westerfteld v. Westerfield, 36 N. J. Eq. 195, 197. See Words and Phrases, definition and discussion of Alimony Pendente Lite.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • An Giang Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Co. v. United States

    284 F. Supp. 3d 1350 · United States Court of International Trade · Jan 19, 2018

    See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cryns v. Musher

    161 F.2d 217 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1947

    All of the cases relied upon by the board, and the case of Chapman v. … As stated by the Board of Interference Examiners in the case of Thompson v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Hurricane Rita Evacuation Bus Fire

    216 S.W.3d 70 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Mar 6, 2006

    Brown Brown & Adkins 712 Main Street, Suite 2120 Houston, Texas 77002 Mark E. Enright Arnstein & Lehr, LLP 120 S. … Each Individually v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United States

    397 F.2d 826 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

    See also e. g., Hirsch v. United States, 94 Ct.Cl. 602, 637 (1941); Ruff v. United States, 96 Ct.Cl. 148, 160, 162-164 (1942); Loftis v. … The facts contained in this opinion are derived from unchallenged facts in the board opinion and from undisputed evidence in the board record. See e.g., Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • American Paper Goods Co. v. United States

    19 F. Supp. 537 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1937

    Board’s decision) if no such petition for review has been filed; and that a jeopardy assessment may not be made after the decision of the Board has become final. … Horuff v. United States, 9 F.Supp. 1016 , 80 Ct.Cl. 761 . For- these reasons plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • V-K

    24 I. & N. Dec. 500 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

    Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 500 (BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3609 Matter of V-K-, Respondent Decided May 8, 2008 … Dizengoff, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, COLE, and PAULEY, Board Members.

    Overruled on other grounds by Z-Z-O, 26 I. & N. Dec. 586 (2015)Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Dan D. Diamond v. The United States

    344 F.2d 703 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

    In Friedman v. … The following cases are examples of those in which (1) a Correction Board was the first competent hoard to act and (2) suit was brought within 6 years of the action of the Correction Board: Harper v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • 190415-38331

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 29, 2021

    See Porter v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 233, 235-36 (1993); Glover v. West, 185 F. 3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1999). … See Gregory v. Brown. 8 Vet. App. 563, 567 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024

    Rogers, V, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. … rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berdick v. United States

    612 F.2d 533 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

    Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 1503 (1976). … Brown v. United States, supra at 788, 524 F.2d at 705 .

    Vacated in part, on other grounds by Berdick v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 993 (1982)Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Hay v. Commissioner

    13 T.C. 840 · United States Tax Court · Nov 30, 1949

    Gardner v. Herbert, 5 Pac. (2d) 782 ; Brown v. Brown, 73 Pac. (2d) 795 . … Brown v. Brown, supra; Ford v. Ford, 155 Pac. (2d) 485 ; White v. White, 163 Pac. (2d) 137 ; State v. Superior Court, 164 Pac. (2d) 890 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Six v. United States

    80 Fed. Cl. 694 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2008

    Six II was decided after remand to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR or Board) following this court’s review of a prior decision of the BCNR in Six v. United States (Six I), 71 Fed.Cl. 671 (2006). … Id. at 526 (citing Lamle v. Mattel, Inc., 394 F.3d 1355 , 1359 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.2005); Abbott Labs. v. Syntron Bioresearch, Inc., 334 F.3d 1343, 1355 (Fed.Cir.2003); Corrigan v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • James A. Beckham v. The United States

    375 F.2d 782 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967

    He appeared before a medical review board; the board had him examined and prepared á report of his medical history for-the Physical Evaluation Board. … Board.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States

    528 F.2d 1392 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976

    Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 969 (1967); Flippin Materials Co. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 357 , 312 F. 2d 408 (1963); Ozark Dam Constructors v. United States, 153 Ct. … In view of the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963), and United States v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Sanders

    521 F.2d 1406 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1975

    DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 499, 504 , 434 F. 2d 1333 (1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846 (1971); Ray v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 1 , 453 F. 2d 754 (1972); Denton v. *964 United States, 204 Ct. … Further, the court has found that there must be satisfactory indication that a correction board’s decision is based “upon a balanced consideration of all the evidence available and presented.” Smith v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.