Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
153 F. Supp. 367 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957
Physical Evaluation Board.” … which the plaintiff was and is claiming retirement rights, had been wholly superseded, as of October 1,1949, by the provisions of Title IV of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 ( 63 Stat. 802 ). *470 In the case of Updike v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedJ. B. Williams Co. v. United States
450 F.2d 1379 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971
and/or 715 CD-V, provided we are the low bidder under this invitation. … See. e.g., Aerodex, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 344 , 350 n. 7, 417 P. 2d 1361 , 1367 n. 7 (1969) ; North American Philips Co. v. United States, 175 Ct.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMountain Gateway Order, Inc. v. Virginia Community College System
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2024
In doing so, Applicant relies on similarities between district court and Board proceedings. 4 TTABVUE 9 (citing Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. S.C. … Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished100 F. Supp. 451 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951
This board recommended that plaintiff appear before a retiring board. … Lemly v. United States, 75 F.Supp. 248 , 109 Ct.Cl. 760, 763 ; Cook v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 782 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 884 ; Rudd v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 432 .
Cited 23 timesPublished7 T.C. 723 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 1946
Brown, 7 T. C. 715 , and Frank J. Kalchthaler, 7 T. C. 625 . The above holding applies equally to payments made to Margaret Wick during 1943, aggregating $2,298.42. … Gundry v. Gundry (Okla.), 68 Pac. 509, 510 ; Westerfteld v. Westerfield, 36 N. J. Eq. 195, 197. See Words and Phrases, definition and discussion of Alimony Pendente Lite.
Cited 30 timesPublishedAn Giang Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Co. v. United States
284 F. Supp. 3d 1350 · United States Court of International Trade · Jan 19, 2018
See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished161 F.2d 217 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1947
All of the cases relied upon by the board, and the case of Chapman v. … As stated by the Board of Interference Examiners in the case of Thompson v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedIn Re Hurricane Rita Evacuation Bus Fire
216 S.W.3d 70 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Mar 6, 2006
Brown Brown & Adkins 712 Main Street, Suite 2120 Houston, Texas 77002 Mark E. Enright Arnstein & Lehr, LLP 120 S. … Each Individually v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedMorrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United States
397 F.2d 826 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968
See also e. g., Hirsch v. United States, 94 Ct.Cl. 602, 637 (1941); Ruff v. United States, 96 Ct.Cl. 148, 160, 162-164 (1942); Loftis v. … The facts contained in this opinion are derived from unchallenged facts in the board opinion and from undisputed evidence in the board record. See e.g., Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v.
Cited 54 timesPublishedAmerican Paper Goods Co. v. United States
19 F. Supp. 537 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1937
Board’s decision) if no such petition for review has been filed; and that a jeopardy assessment may not be made after the decision of the Board has become final. … Horuff v. United States, 9 F.Supp. 1016 , 80 Ct.Cl. 761 . For- these reasons plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.
Cited 2 timesPublished24 I. & N. Dec. 500 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008
Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 500 (BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3609 Matter of V-K-, Respondent Decided May 8, 2008 … Dizengoff, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, COLE, and PAULEY, Board Members.
Overruled on other grounds by Z-Z-O, 26 I. & N. Dec. 586 (2015)Cited 34 timesPublishedDan D. Diamond v. The United States
344 F.2d 703 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965
In Friedman v. … The following cases are examples of those in which (1) a Correction Board was the first competent hoard to act and (2) suit was brought within 6 years of the action of the Correction Board: Harper v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 29, 2021
See Porter v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 233, 235-36 (1993); Glover v. West, 185 F. 3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1999). … See Gregory v. Brown. 8 Vet. App. 563, 567 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRecord Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024
Rogers, V, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. … rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished612 F.2d 533 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979
Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 1503 (1976). … Brown v. United States, supra at 788, 524 F.2d at 705 .
Vacated in part, on other grounds by Berdick v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 993 (1982)Cited 89 timesPublished13 T.C. 840 · United States Tax Court · Nov 30, 1949
Gardner v. Herbert, 5 Pac. (2d) 782 ; Brown v. Brown, 73 Pac. (2d) 795 . … Brown v. Brown, supra; Ford v. Ford, 155 Pac. (2d) 485 ; White v. White, 163 Pac. (2d) 137 ; State v. Superior Court, 164 Pac. (2d) 890 .
Cited 1 timesPublished80 Fed. Cl. 694 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2008
Six II was decided after remand to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR or Board) following this court’s review of a prior decision of the BCNR in Six v. United States (Six I), 71 Fed.Cl. 671 (2006). … Id. at 526 (citing Lamle v. Mattel, Inc., 394 F.3d 1355 , 1359 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.2005); Abbott Labs. v. Syntron Bioresearch, Inc., 334 F.3d 1343, 1355 (Fed.Cir.2003); Corrigan v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJames A. Beckham v. The United States
375 F.2d 782 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967
He appeared before a medical review board; the board had him examined and prepared á report of his medical history for-the Physical Evaluation Board. … Board.
Cited 29 timesPublishedMerritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States
528 F.2d 1392 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976
Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 969 (1967); Flippin Materials Co. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 357 , 312 F. 2d 408 (1963); Ozark Dam Constructors v. United States, 153 Ct. … In view of the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963), and United States v.
Cited 37 timesPublished521 F.2d 1406 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1975
DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 499, 504 , 434 F. 2d 1333 (1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846 (1971); Ray v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 1 , 453 F. 2d 754 (1972); Denton v. *964 United States, 204 Ct. … Further, the court has found that there must be satisfactory indication that a correction board’s decision is based “upon a balanced consideration of all the evidence available and presented.” Smith v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna