Case law

General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 23, 2019

MCNUL T ·1, Administrative Judge ( i V .Armed Services … Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Reeves v. Department of the Army

228 Ct. Cl. 811 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1981

Louis Field Office of the Merits Systems Protection Board. Petitioner sought review by the Board itself, but such review was denied by the Board on January 6, 1981. … See Jenkins v. United States, ante at 794, decided this day by order, and see, also Coleman v. Department of the Army, 227 Ct.Cl. 536 (1981).

Emilio Pucci International BV v. Rani Sachdev

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 20, 2016

Fort Howard Paper Co. v. G.V. Gambina Inc., 4 USPQ2d at 1553-54. Cf. Patagonia, Inc. v. … Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp. v.

Fifth Generation Inc. v. Titomirov Vodka LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 31, 2019

Cir. 2011) (affirming Board’s entry of judgment as a discovery sanction for repeated failures to comply with Board’s reasonable orders), aff’g 96 USPQ2d 1134 (TTAB 2010); MHW Ltd. v. … Benedict’s repeated failures to comply” with Board procedures and orders); SFM, LLC v.

Harold Grubin v. The United States

333 F.2d 861 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

We have specifically ruled that Disposition Boards are not competent or proper boards to determine retirement for disability. Hoppock v. United States, supra. … See finding 24(f) (g); Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 445, 454-455 (1960); Harper v. United States, Ct.Cl., No. 206-59, decided Nov. 7, 1962, slip op., p. 5, 310 F.2d 405 , 408; Dickson v.

Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co. v. United States

499 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

See United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963) ; United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, 384 U.S. 424 (1966) ; United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394 (1966). … The holding In United States v.

Grant v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 600 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

Reed v. Franke, 187 F. Supp. 905 (E.D. Va. 1960), aff’d 297 F. 2d 17 (4 Cir. 1961); Ives v. Franke, 271 F. 2d 469 (D.C. Cir. 1959). … He cites for support the following cases: Fannie Mae Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404 , 296 F. 2d 226 (1960); Bland v. Connally, 293 F. 2d 852 (D.C. Cir. 1961); Davis v. Stahr, 293 F. 2d 860 *612 (D.C.

Danko Arlington, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 20, 2025

SPE7L3-19-V-0288 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. John D. … I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63876-ADR, Appeal of Danko Arlington, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter

Nelms v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 423 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

She had a large brown envelope of papers and offered them to me to review, indicating she had performance ratings, letters from people she had worked for etc. … It stated, in part, that I had a large brown envelope of papers with me when I was employed, but that she was interested only in confirming eligibility for reinstatement.

Barker v. United States

140 F. Supp. 415 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1956

His right of action accrued only when the retiring board acts arbitrarily or otherwise unlawfully. Odell v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 634 . It was on this date (May 14, 1947) that plaintiff’s cause of action accrued. … Cuiffo v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 60 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; MacFarlane v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 755 . Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

River Construction Corp. v. United States

159 Ct. Cl. 254 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962

See, e.g., Richardson v. … Bateson Construction Co. v. United States, supra. Russell H. Williams, et al. v.

United States v. Olivotti

7 Ct. Cust. 46 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 28, 1916

Standard Dictionary; Century Dictionary; United States v. Downing & Co. ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 545 : T. D., 36197) ; Stern v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 124, 126 ; T. D. 32381) ; United States v. … United States v. Perry ( 146 U. S., 71, 74 ). Inasmuch as we find that the font is not sculpture and not a work of the fine arts, we think that it is not dutiable under paragraph 376 as found by the board.

Howard Hartry, Inc. v. United States

67 Cust. Ct. 284 · United States Customs Court · Oct 21, 1971

Brown, owner and manager of Dale Brown Marine Sales, the ultimate consignee of the involved merchandise, testified that his firm is a marine engine distributor which deals in gasoline and diesel auxiliary engines, that he … In United States v. Outerbridge & Co., 7 Ct. Cust.

13-13 336

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 31, 2017

This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from rating decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Detroit, Michigan. … BROWN Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs

L-M-P

27 I. & N. Dec. 265 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2018

Thomas-Dorris, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS, MULLANE, and LIEBOWITZ, Board Members. … See Clark v.

In Re Hurricane Rita Evacuation Bus Fire

216 S.W.3d 70 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Mar 6, 2006

Brown Brown & Adkins 712 Main Street, Suite 2120 Houston, Texas 77002 Mark E. Enright Arnstein & Lehr, LLP 120 S. … Each Individually v.

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Commissioner

23 B.T.A. 177 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1931

Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cls. 41; Baldwin Locomotive Works v. … Cleveland Railway Co. v. Commissioner, 36 Fed. (2d) 347, affirming 10 B. T. A. 310; Jacob F. Brown, 18 B. T. A. 859; Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 22 B. T. A. 507; cf. Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 .

American Paper Goods Co. v. United States

19 F. Supp. 537 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1937

Board’s decision) if no such petition for review has been filed; and that a jeopardy assessment may not be made after the decision of the Board has become final. … Horuff v. United States, 9 F.Supp. 1016 , 80 Ct.Cl. 761 . For- these reasons plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

190415-38331

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 29, 2021

See Porter v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 233, 235-36 (1993); Glover v. West, 185 F. 3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1999). … See Gregory v. Brown. 8 Vet. App. 563, 567 (1996).

08-30 569

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

See also Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995). … McClain v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 319, 321 (2007). A layperson is competent to report on the onset and continuity of current symptomatology that is observable to the senses. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.