Case law

Akawa v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 418 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1923

& Co. v. … United States v. Gage ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 306 ; T. D. 37584); United States v. International Forwarding Co. (8 id. 378 ; T. D. 37632); Johnson & Co., v. United States (10 id. 54; T. D. 38333); Cochran Co., v.

JML Logistics LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 24, 2025

SPE7L4-20-V-0189 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Ms. Rita J. Collins Owner APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. … the Board’s Charter.

Worthington v. Commissioner

18 T.C. 796 · United States Tax Court · Jul 25, 1952

As early as April 20, 1922, as evidenced by the agreement entered into by them, Emma Browne Worthington and Warwick and Percy Worthington were convinced that Emma Browne Worthington took a legal life estate under the will … Respondent argues that the facts of this case bring it within the rationale of the City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Pedrick, 168 F. 2d 618 . We can not agree.

Turnbull, Inc., Individually and Turnbull, Inc., and A. & H., Inc., Co-Venturers v. The United States

389 F.2d 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

McGraw & Co. v. … Under United States v.

Washington v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 459 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 16, 1991

In addition, appellant argued that the Board’s statements are legally inadequate pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1) and Gilbert v. … Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 164 (1991) (the Board’s analysis must supply the “reasons or bases” required by 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1) for the conclusion that the veteran is employable); Hyder v.

Monroe-Goldkamp Co. v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 545 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1926

Newcomb v. Wood, 97 U. S. 581 ; Pugh v. Bluff City Excursion Co., 177 Fed. 399 ; Felton v. Spiro, 78 Fed. 576 . … D. 41341; Bache & Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 507 .

Kyocera International, Inc. v. United States

527 F. Supp. 337 · United States Court of International Trade · Sep 11, 1981

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States, 53 CCPA 19, 24, C.A.D. 870 (1966). … Ozen Sound Devices v. United States, 67 CCPA -, C.A.D. 1246, 620 F.2d 880, 882 (1980); Ameliotex, Inc. v. United States, 65 CCPA 22, C.A.D. 1200, 565 F.2d 674 (1977); Esco Manufacturing Co., aka J. Hofert Co. v.

John Lauri Salo v. Department of Defense

2015 MSPB 14 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 13, 2015

We find support for this determination in Kelly v. Department of the Army, 121 M.S.P.R. 408, ¶¶ 3, 7, 15 (2014), where the Board applied 5 C.F.R. Part 752, rather than 5 C.F.R. … Mertins v.

Marley v. United States

423 F.2d 324 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

General Builders Supply Co. v. United States, supra. The merits of the challenge to the Board’s decision are now to be considered. … Rumley v. United States, supra; Alabama Shirt & Trouser Co. v. United States, supra.

Goodbar v. Banner

599 F.2d 431 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1979

According to petitioners here, “this court held in Cook v. … See Feigelman v. Meyers, 476 F.2d 1375 , 177 U.S.P.Q. 530 (CCPA 1973); United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co., 341 F.2d 157 , 52 CCPA 967, 144 U.S.P.Q. 429 (1965); Seamless Rubber Co. v.

Foster v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 440 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 21, 1983

Deering v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 342, 349 , 620 F.2d 242, 245 (1980) (en banc) (citing Brundage v. … Harrison v.

Cartright v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 24 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 17, 1991

Cartright, Jr., seeks review of a September 28, 1989, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied his reopened claim for service-connected asthma. … Dixie Ohio Express Co. v. Lowery, 115 F.2d 56, 57 (5th Cir.1940). In Gilbert v.

Boyer v. United States

81 Fed. Cl. 188 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2008

Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2001))). Thus, “[t]he burden of overturning a military board decision is a heavy one.” French v. … See Flute v.

07-22 179

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36 (1994). … Sklar v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 140 (1993). As true with any piece of evidence, the credibility and weight to be assigned to these opinions are within the province of the Board as adjudicators. Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.

United States v. Oberle

1 Ct. Cust. 527 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 24, 1911

In view of the rule of the board it would seem unimportant. … United States v. Reibe (1 Ct. Cust. Appls., p. 19; T. D. 30776).

190920-32341

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2021

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … CARACCIOLO Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Laura C. Owens The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Moscahlades Bros. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 289 · United States Customs Court · Jun 17, 1953

to dark brown in color. … It consists of reddish-brown olives which have been slashed and placed in a liquid. The record in the case of United States v. Union Olive Oil Co., Inc., 38 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 73, C. A.

Nettie Casey v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 26, 2019

Nolan v. … Moreover, contrary to the appellant's framing of the issues, 74 the Board's reasons or bases were adequate here; we can review this Board decision effectively and think the Board explained its actions sufficiently to enable

The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama and Mr. Paul W. Bryant Jr. v. William Pitts Jr. and Christopher Blackburn

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jul 23, 2013

Our primary reviewing court and the Board look to Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. … The function of the Board is to determine whether there is a right to secure or maintain a registration; the Board can do nothing to prevent parties from using a mark in a certain manner. Person’s Co. v.

10-34 001

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55 (1994). … Consequently, the Board finds that the evidence does not show that the criteria for referral are met. 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1) (2013); Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet.