Case law

Ely & Frye v. United States

7 Cust. Ct. 37 · United States Customs Court · Sep 15, 1941

In the case of United States v. American Brown Boveri Electric Corporation, 17 C. C. P. A. 329, T. … In the case of Cunard Steamship Co. et al. v. United States, 22 C. C. P. A. 615, T.

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. The United States

374 F.2d 516 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

The Board is not delegated uncontrolled discretion and its failure to apply guidelines prescribed by authority in a regulation would be an error of law. Paul v. … See e. g., Warner & Swasey Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 330 , 201 F.2d 201 (1952), cert. denied 345 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 782 , 97 L.Ed. 1355 ; Eastern Machinery Co. v.

Capps v. United States

137 F. Supp. 721 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

United States, 100 F.Supp. 451 , 121 Ct.Cl. 643 ; Spencer v. United States, 102 F.Supp. 774 , 121 Ct.Cl. 558 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 828 , 73 S.Ct. 29 , 97 L.Ed. 644 ; and in Girault v. … See Earle Goodwin v. United States, 118 F.Supp. 369 , 127 Ct.Cl. 417 ; Uhley v. United States, 121 F.Supp. 674 , 128 Ct.Cl. 608 .

Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 451 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 18, 1926

Í5326-G and 15327-G Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. … Smith v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 489 , T. D. 31527. The judgment entered by the board is in all respects regular and seems to us to properly determine the issues in the case.

Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 23, 2019

Contract Appeals (Signatures continued)  v ___ I concur I concur J OWEN C. … WILSON 0\dministr tive Judge Administrative Judge Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

210218-141902

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2021

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … MICHAEL LANE Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board Moore, Tara-Deen The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

12-19 794

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2014

Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 458, 461 (1993) (noting that a medical opinion based upon an inaccurate factual premise has no probative value); see also Dalton v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. … Ashley v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 52, 59 (1993); see also Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 206-207 (1994).

Nettie Casey v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 26, 2019

Nolan v. … Moreover, contrary to the appellant's framing of the issues, 74 the Board's reasons or bases were adequate here; we can review this Board decision effectively and think the Board explained its actions sufficiently to enable

Porto Rico Brokerage Co. v. United States

76 F.2d 605 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 19, 1935

Marriott v. Brune et al., 9 How. (50 U. S.) 619, 631, 13 L. Ed. 282 ; Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. (75 U. S.) 123, 136, 19 L. Ed. 382 ; Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 5 S. Ct. 1091 , 29 L. … Ed. 257 ; Pittsburgh & Southern Coal Co. v. Louisiana, 156 U. S. 590, 600 , 15 S. Ct. 459 , 39 L. Ed. 544 ; Patapsco Guano Co. v. Board of Agriculture of North Carolina, 171 U. S. 345, 353 , 18 S. Ct. 862 , 43 L.

08-05 248

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 262 (1994); 38 C.F.R. § 4.14. The rating schedule may not be employed to compensating a claimant twice for the same disability. Brady v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 203, 205-6 (1993). … See Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32 (2011); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995); see also Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 80, 84-5 (1997); 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2006).

190920-32341

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2021

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … CARACCIOLO Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Laura C. Owens The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Weber v. United States

24 C.C.P.A. 349 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1937

This argument is based upon the following authorities: Cadwalader v. Jessup and Moore Paper Co., 149 U. S. 350 ; two decisions of the Board of General Appraisers, namely, T. D. 28360 and T. … The board held it to be free of duty under the free list provision above quoted. In the second decision of the Board of General Appraisers, T.

Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States

128 Fed. Cl. 683 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2016

CMTA-IAM Pension Trust, 746 F.2d 587, 591 (9th Cir. 1984) (fee recovery under ERISA); Smith v. Detroit Board of Education, 728 F.2d 359, 360 (6th Cir. 1984) (fee recovery under 42 U.S.C. § 1988); Lavender v. … See e.g., Maritime Management, Inc. v. United States, 242 F.3d 1326, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001); Mendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board, 92 F.3d 871, 875-77 (9th Cir. 1996); American Hospital Assoc. v.

Strand v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 44 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 3, 2016

Moehl v. United States, 34 Fed. Cl. 682, 690 (1996). Thus, a secretary’s decision may “differ with a board’s recommendations where the evidence is susceptible of varying interpretations.” Id. at 690 (citing Sanders v. … Nevertheless, a secretary may not “arbitrarily refuse to follow the fact findings of the correction board where all the evidence supports the board’s findings.” Moehl, 34 Fed. Cl. at 690 (citing Hertzog v.

J-J

21 I. & N. Dec. 976 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1997

INS v. … V.

Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co. v. United States

458 F.2d 55 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

However, this determination must in the first instance be made by the Board. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc., 384 U.S. 424, 428-29 (1966). … Bostwick-Batterson Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.

Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States

458 F.2d 112 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

United States v. … V.

In Re Radiation Incident at Washington, Dc, Etc.

400 F. Supp. 1404 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Sep 15, 1975

Powell v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 75-112 District of the District of Columbia Dennis E. Siegel v. Value Engineering Co., et al. Theodore W. Blakeney, Jr. v. Value Engineering Co., et al. Arthur C. … Kappelmann, et ux. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al. Willie L. Evans v. Value Engineering Co., et al. Richard Penna, et al. v. Value Engineering Co., et al.

In Re Allen

115 F.2d 936 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 9, 1940

“Appellee points out that in the Clement v. Richards v. … It is true that in the case of Clement v. Richards v.

Zanzarella v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2026

The Griffin, Brown, and Chianese Property At summary judgment, the Court made two rulings relevant to the Griffin, Brown, and Chianese properties. … Neither party disputes that both instruments apply to the Griffin, Brown, and Chianese properties.