Case law

08-05 248

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 262 (1994); 38 C.F.R. § 4.14. The rating schedule may not be employed to compensating a claimant twice for the same disability. Brady v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 203, 205-6 (1993). … See Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32 (2011); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995); see also Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 80, 84-5 (1997); 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2006).

Lawrence Little, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

2017 MSPB 5 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017

See Hamilton v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 75 F.3d 639, 646-47 & n.9 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Saddler v. Department of the Army, 68 F.3d 1357, 1358-59 (Fed. Cir. 1995); Cody v. … See generally Rocha v. Merit Systems Protection Board & Department of State, 688 F.3d 1307 (Fed.

14-24 145

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 242, 245 (1994) (quoting in part Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 310 (1992)); see 38 C.F.R. § 20.1403(a). … App. 180, 203, footnote 4 (citing Bowyer v. Brown, 7 Vet.

09-46 603

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

The degree of impairment resulting from a disability is a factual determination and generally the Board's primary focus in such cases is upon the current severity of the disability. Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. … App. 55, 57-58 (1994); Solomon v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 396, 402 (1994).

Mense v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 354 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 10, 1991

. § 4004 (d)(1) (1988), the Board is required to delineate in its decision the “reasons or bases” for its findings of material fact and conclusions of law. Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 59 (1990). … See also Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 78, 81 (1990); Sammarco v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 111, 112 (1991); Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 164, 169 (1991).

Revolution Jewelry Works, Inc. v. Stonebrook Jewelry, LLC DBA Revolution Jewelry

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 7, 2022

Nabisco Inc. v. Wm. Wrigley Jr. … Inc. v. PC Auth.

Greenwald v. United States

88 Ct. Cl. 264 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1939

In Holland v. United States, 83 C. … This case is clearly distinguishable from the case of Terry v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 958 .

Anderson Snapper Boats, Inc.

215 Ct. Cl. 998 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1977

Donna Jean, Inc. v. United States, No. 105-77, is pending before Trial Judge White. … Leonard v. United States, No. 121-77, and Litrico v. United States, No. 517-77, are pending before Trial Judge Yock. Trial Judge Yock suspended proceedings in Leonard.

In re Wafmouth

486 F.2d 1058 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 8, 1973

Appellee cites Storchheim v. Daugherty, 56 C.C.P.A. 1147 , 410 F.2d 1393 , 161 U.S.P.Q. 679 (1969), but we think that Hall v. … See also Den Beste v. Martin, 45 C.C.P. A. 798, 252 F.2d 302 , 116 U.S.P.Q. 584 (1958). Ex parte O’Reilly, 162 U.S.P.Q. 499 (PO Bd.

Linair, Inc.

25 Cont. Cas. Fed. 83,091 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1979

The Board then went on to suggest that, despite this court’s decision in Maney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct. … In view of the Board’s terse dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and of its statement refusing (in effect) to follow the Maney decision, we disagree, see, Monroe M. Tapper & Assocs. v. United States, 198 Ct.

Keef v. United States

185 Ct. Cl. 454 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957) ; Conn v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 120 , 376 F. 2d 878 (1967) ; Cole v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 178 (1965) ; Middleton v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 36 (1965) ; Sofranoff v. … In Birt v.

United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.

3 Ct. Cust. 146 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1912

Dutilh v. Maxwell (2 Blatch., 541, Fed. Gas. No. 4, 207). … See also Gauthier v. Bell ( 10 Fed.

Skelly v. United States

685 F.2d 414 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1982

Co. v. United States, 226 Ct. … Whether or not the board decides to waive this requirement would be a matter within the board’s discretion, absent abuse of that discretion. Linair, Inc. v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 654 (1979); Tapper v.

Estate of McKaig v. Commissioner

51 T.C. 331 · United States Tax Court · Dec 3, 1968

until July 1, 1968, before complying with Brown’s request. … In the latter respect it also differs from Arlington Corp. v. Commissioner, supra; Eppler v. Commissioner, supra; and Tenzer v. Commissioner, supra.

Peoria Tribe of Indians ex rel. Kaskaskia & Peoria Nations

618 F.2d 121 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1979

Indians of California v. United States, 16 Ind. Cl. Comm. 631 , 663 (1966); Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States, 9 Ind. Cl. Comm. 572 , 579 (1961). … Klamath & Modoc Tribes v. United States, Ct. Cl. No. 125-61 (order, Feb. 2, 1973). We adhere to these precedents in deciding the present case.

Intex Recreation Corp. and Intex Marketing Ltd. v. The Coleman Company, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Feb 24, 2016

v. The Coleman Company, Inc. George C. … Upon reviewing this material, as well as additional case law on the topic, the Board is particularly persuaded by the approach taken in Beverage Distributors, Inc. v.

Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. v. United States

121 F. Supp. 3d 1263 · United States Court of International Trade · Oct 5, 2015

Co. v. … Co. v.

Servello v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 196 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 21, 1992

See Gilbert v. … See Gleicher v.

Spear v. Commissioner

91 T.C. 984 · United States Tax Court · Dec 6, 1988

Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 (1970); Meier v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 273 (1988); Peck v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 162, 165-166 (1988). … There was no evidence that what Brown did in terms of arriving at those figures was contrary to generally accepted accounting principles. Brown was not called as a witness by the Government.

George D. Harter Bank v. Commissioner

27 B.T.A. 941 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 16, 1933

See Weiss v. Weiner, 279 U. S. 333 ; Burke-Waggoner Oil Ass’n. v. Hopkins, 269 U. S. 110 ; United States v. Childs, 266 U. S. 304 . … See also Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, 287 U. S. 308 , and Strother v. Burnet, 287 U. S. 314 .