Case law

Saber Interactive Incorporated v. Oovee Ltd

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 1, 2022

v. Selkow, 92 USPQ2d 1478, 1480 (TTAB 2009). The Board has the authority to strike an impermissible or insufficient claim from a pleading. Finanz St. Honore, B.V. v. … Inc. v. Qinqdao Brewery, 17 USPQ2d 1137, 1139 (TTAB 1990); see also TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD MANUAL OF PROCEDURE (“TBMP”) § 506.01 (2020).

09-04 223

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 39 (1993). … Under these circumstances, the Board also finds that VA has a duty to make a further attempt to obtain the Veteran's private treatment records. Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204 (1994).

04-40 703

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2014

See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2013); Harder v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 183, 187 (1993). … App. 295 (2008); see also Wray v. Brown, 7 Vet.

Dorl v. United States

200 Ct. Cl. 626 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1973

This court will not overturn the decision of a Correction Board without such allegations and proof. See Wood v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 737 (1966); and Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. … Clinton v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 604 , 423 F. 2d 1367 (1970); and Arnheiter v. Ignatius, 292 F. Supp. 911 (N.D. Cal. 1968), aff'd 435 F. 2d 691 (9th Cir. 1970); and Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953).

Jennifer J. Erlendson v. Department of Justice

2014 MSPB 61 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 4, 2014

. § 2302(a)(2)(C)(ii), cannot file a USERRA appeal with the Board); 2 Hereford v. … See Mitchell v.

East Toledo Paint Shop Co. v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 1195 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1925

East Toledo Paint Shop Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3441. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 1195 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2114 ; November 6, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 22, 1925 . *2114 Thomas O. … Coney 1 Florence Snyder 1 Howard Eggleston 3 Cleo Richard Brown 2 *2115 All of the stock, except that held by Wesley L. Thurstin, jr., and H. H. Nelson, was issued for cash.

Campbell v. United States

132 F. Supp. 225 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

In United States v. Burchard, 125 U. … Potts v. United States, 125 U. S. 173 . Also this court has held in McBlair v. United States, 19 C. Cls. 528 ; Spencer v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 558 and Carlin v. United States, 121 C.

Betts v. United States

172 F. Supp. 450 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1959

Eicks v. United States, Ct.Cl., 172 F.Supp. 445 decided this day, and the cases therein cited. The Government raises a question of the law of the Constitution. … See Friedman v. United States, 158 F.Supp. 364, 374 , 141 C.Cl.-; Eicks v. United States, supra.

J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United States

412 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

And the Board then quotes from this court’s decision in Bruce Const. Corp. v. … [Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 109 F.2d 9, 20 , 7th Cir. (1940); National Labor Relations Board v. Phelps, 136 F.2d 562 , 5th Cir. (1943)]. Further, citing Camero v.

King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen, Inc.

496 F.2d 1400 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 6, 1974

That refusal was error, as is evident from our opinions in Contour Chair-Lounge Co., Inc., v. The Englander Co., Inc., 51 CCPA 833, 324 F.2d 186 , 139 USPQ 285 (1963); David Crystal, Inc. v. … Shelburne Shirt Co., Inc., 59 CCPA 1248, 465 F.2d 926 , 175 USPQ 112 (1972); and Anderson, Clayton and Co. v. Krier, 478 F.2d 1246 , 178 USPQ 46 (CCPA, 1973).

Kansas Gas and Electric Company v. United States

111 Fed. Cl. 169 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2013

In United States v. Brown, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court‟s extension of time for filing a late notice of appeal where a criminal defendant‟s counsel had missed the deadline by one day. United States v. … Brown, 133 F.3d 993 (7th Cir. 1998).

Est of Hawaii v. Commissioner

71 T.C. 1067 · United States Tax Court · Mar 28, 1979

Group, Inc. v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965), Judge Harlan concurring, at 579-580, and Judge Goldberg dissenting, at 580.

McCloskey & Co. v. United States

530 F.2d 374 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976

Manning v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 756 (1973). This is because, as we explained in Kyer v. United States, 177 Ct. … Kyer v. United States, supra, 177 Ct. Cl. at 751 , 369 F. 2d at 718 . Our prior decisions in Buts Engineering Corp. v. United States, supra, and Breitbeck v.

Constance A. West v. Department of Health and Human Services

2015 MSPB 34 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 30, 2015

In such appeals, the merits of the agency’s decision are not before the Board. Hope v. Department of the Army, 108 M.S.P.R. 6, ¶ 7 (2008). … See Rivera v.

Northwest Automatic Products Corp. v. United States

24 T.C. 460 · United States Tax Court · Jun 23, 1955

Northwest Automatic Products Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, Petitioner, v. The United States of America, Respondent Northwest Automatic Products Corp. v. United States Docket No. 798-R. … Browning Chief, Price Adjustment Division Distribution: Mr. Lubin Mr. Cahill Accts. File *469 On that same date, Browning, Chief of Chicago P. A.

H & M Moving, Inc. v. United States

499 F.2d 660 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

The board noted that both sides relied on the case of United States v. … In the above case, the Ninth Circuit cited one of its earlier opinions, California State Board of Equalization v.

Levy v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 468 · United States Customs Court · Mar 5, 1958

I always considered that I was purchasing the automobile from the David Brown Company in London. … In the case of Helvering v. San Joaquin Co., 297 U.

08-34 074

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). … Degmetich v. Brown, 104 F.3d 1328, 1331 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Overlook Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States

556 F.2d 500 · United States Court of Claims · May 18, 1977

Lopez v. … Of course, the board was correct in stating the law that the Government is not bound by the unauthorized acts of its agents, Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v.

Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United States

641 F. Supp. 3d 1371 · United States Court of International Trade · May 18, 2023

United States, Court No. 17-00100, are Aeolus Tyre Co. v. United States, Court No. 17-00102; Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co. v. United States, Court No. 17-00103; Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co. v. … United States, Court No. 17-00104; Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co. v. United States, Court No. 17-00111; Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. v. United States, Court No. 17-00113; and Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co. v.