Case law

Willie J. Threatt v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 56 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 17, 2016

Bove, 25 Vet.App. at 140 (citing Brandenburg v. Principi, 371 F.3d 1362, 1364 (Fed.Cir.2004); Barrett v. Principi, 363 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed.Cir.2004); Santana-Venegas v. … See Harper v. Va.

Ward v. United States

178 Ct. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 545 (1964). … See Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 388 (1966).

Tofe v. Winchell

645 F.2d 58 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1981

However, this Board views the decision in Thompson v. … Loshbough v. Allen, 54 CCPA 1113, 373 F.2d 747 , 152 USPQ 812 (1967). As a final matter, we endorse the procedure by the board indicated by the report of the proceedings in Steierman v.

09-46 163

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 28, 2015

Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … Hatlestad v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 524, 529 (1993).

Scates v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 62 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 14, 2000

In Cox v. West, 149 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. … The aggrieved party may then file a Notice of Disagreement and pursue an appeal to the Board and this Court if so desired. See Cox, 149 F.2d at 1362; cf. Hanlin v.

National Hat Pin Co. v. United States

5 Ct. Cust. 435 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 27, 1914

In United States v. Lun Chong & Co. ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 468 ; T. … United States v. Bennett ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 249 ; T.

Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United States

405 F.2d 554 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

In United States v. … See River Construction Corporation v. United States, supra; also see, T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v.

William L. Schiffman v. The United States

319 F.2d 886 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

In Uhley v. … [Caddington v.

11-01 353

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

See Allen v. Brown , 7 Vet. … App. at 394; Monroe v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 513, 515 (1993).

Kehoskie v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 31 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 17, 1991

The Board found that the evidence submitted by appellant to reopen his claim was duplicative. Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.156 (a) (1991) evidence is not material if it is cumulative or redundant. See also Colvin v. … A reopening was inappropriate here and, had an error been alleged in the Board’s ensuing review process, such error would be considered harmless. See 38 U.S.C. § 7261 (b) (formerly § 4061(b)); Thompson v.

Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United States

434 F.2d 1333 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1970

See Mathis v. United States, 391 F.2d 938 , 183 Ct.Cl. 145 (1968); Wood v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl, 955 (1968); Hixon v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 949 (1968). … Anthony v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 923 (1967); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 261, 264 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 838 , 85 S.Ct. 76 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964).

Sergio Luna v. Department of Homeland Security

2024 MSPB 2 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 10, 2024

South Corp. v. United States, 690 F.2d 1368, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 1982) (en banc). These decisions of the U.S. Court of Claims are, in turn, binding on the Board. Social Security Administration v. … She reasoned that the appellant was urging her to add an additional condition to the Board’s holding in Haine, and that she was not free to do so. Id.; see Rose v.

Jennifer J. Erlendson v. Department of Justice

2014 MSPB 61 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 4, 2014

. § 2302(a)(2)(C)(ii), cannot file a USERRA appeal with the Board); 2 Hereford v. … See Mitchell v.

Jerome J. Pine v. The United States

371 F.2d 466 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

light of Williams v. … There are no unusual circumstances (see footnote 1, supra) excusing plaintiff’s failure to raise this question before the Board of Appeals and Review. Williams v.

04-40 703

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 29, 2014

See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2013); Harder v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 183, 187 (1993). … App. 295 (2008); see also Wray v. Brown, 7 Vet.

Herrera-Nunez

29 I. & N. Dec. 691 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jun 12, 2026

Lopez v. Garland, 60 F.4th 1208, 1212 (9th Cir. 2023); see also Mejia-Alvarenga v. … Honcharov v.

United States v. Macy & Co.

13 Ct. Cust. 245 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 21, 1925

We have uniformly held that *249 the Board of General Appraisers is a judicial tribunal. United States v. Kurtz et al., 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 144 ; United States v. McConnaughey Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 112 ; T. D. 40944. … Co. v. Kidd, 146 Fed. 499 ; Rathbone v. Rathbone, 4 Pick. 89 (92). The Board of General Appraisers construed the petition filed in this case as sufficient under Rule XXXVI.

Santana v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 51 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2016

.”); Hernandez v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 532, 536–37 (1997); Brezler v. Mills, 86 F. … Whether or not this was an adequate request for a special board, see Crumley v. United States, 122 Fed.

Klein v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 273 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 21, 1925

S. 38 ; Morrill v. Jones, 106 U. S. 466 ; United States v. Eaton, 144 U. S. 677 ; Steinmetz v. Allen, 192 U. S. 543 ; Williamson v. United States, 207 U. S. 425 ; Aktieselskabet Fide v. … Lloyd Braziliero, 283 Fed. 62 ; Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United States, 9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 141 ; United States v. Younglove Grocery Co., 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 377 .

Mine Inspector Salaries

68 Pa. D. & C. 411 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Jul 29, 1949

In Richie v. Philadelphia, 225 Pa. 511, 516 (1909), Mr. Justice Brown, quoting from the opinion of the Superior Court in the same case ( 37 Pa. … Thus in State v. Board of County Commissioners, 191 P. (2d) 670, 672 (1948), the Supreme Court of Montana said: *418 “. . .