Case law

Child Labor Law

9 Pa. D. & C. 779 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 24, 1927

I am mindful of the statement in the opinion of Attorney-General Brown (Jan. 3,1916, 25 Dist. … The law gives the Industrial Board no power or authority to suspend the operations of the law. 2.

09-07 154

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

Cir. 2007); Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303, 310 (2007). See also 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(a)(2); Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. … See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b); 38 C.F.R. § 4.3; Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996).

Price v. United States

149 F. Supp. 181 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

Moreover, plaintiff’s right to sue in this court accrued, if at all, when the Disposition Board on June 30, 1945, found her fit for general duty, instead of ordering her before a Retiring Board. MacFarlane v. … Cls. 755 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; Odell v. United *687 States, 134 C. Cls. 634 ; Rosnick v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 1 , rehearing denied 132 C. Cls. 6 .

Air-A-Plane Corporation v. The United States

408 F.2d 1030 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1969

After United States v. … We must remember, too, that the Board appeal was heard well before United States v.

United States v. Monsanto Chemical Works

21 C.C.P.A. 33 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 12, 1933

Every such application shall be assigned by the Board of. … Malony v. Adsit, supra; Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. District of Columbia, 195 U. S. 322, 330 ; McCuing v. Bovay, 60 F. (2d) 375, 376; compare Christy v. Pridgeon, 4 Wall. 196, 201, 202 .

09-37 151

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

Wamhoff v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 517, 522 (1996); Zarycki v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 91, 100 (1993); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 190, 193 (1991). … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2025

Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 1998). The court owes “substantial deference” to the corrections board; it “does not sit as a ‘super correction board.’” Chapman v. … As an initial matter, a party who makes an argument before the board cannot later complain that the board erred if it adopts or agrees with that argument. Key Pharmaceuticals v.

Humphrey v. United States

101 F. Supp. 759 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1952

In Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … However, as this court pointed out in McKenzie, Trustee v. United States, 119 C.

May Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 266 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1924

Kohne v. Insurance Co. ( 1 Wash. C. C. 138 , 165); United States v. … —Brown & Co. et al. v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 207 ; T. D. 40026); Scaramelli v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134 ; T. D. 40056); Keve & Young v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 103 ; T.

United States v. Kurtz, Stuböeck & Co.

5 Ct. Cust. 144 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 5, 1914

Sec. 14, act of 1909; McGoon v. Scales ( 9 Wall., 23, 30 ). … Brignardello ( 1 Wall., 627, 634 ); Voorhees v. United States Bank ( 10 Pet., 449 , 473). The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

04-41 875

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

Watson v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 309, 314 (1993); see also Boyer v. West, 210 F.3d 1351, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2000). … See also Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997).

12-25 396

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See Colayong v. West, 12 Vet. App. 524, 532 (1999); Goss v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 109, 114 (1996).

MacFarlane v. United States

140 F. Supp. 420 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

However, this contention was rejected in the case of Holliday v. … United States, 137 F.Supp. 944 , 131 Ct.Cl. 60 , and Girault v.

Woodruff v. United States

80 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2008

Therefore, an FAA employee “may submit an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and may seek judicial review of any resulting final orders or decisions of the Board from any action that was ap-pealable to the Board … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.

06-14 287

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(a)(2); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 471 (1994).

Brewer v. United States Postal Service

647 F.2d 1093 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 12, 1981

v. … Jones v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 135 , 617 F.2d 233 (1980), Heffron v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 474 , 405 F.2d 1307 (1969).

O-S-G

24 I. & N. Dec. 56 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2006

FOR RESPONDENT: Brad Alexander, Esquire, Miami, Florida BEFORE: Board Panel: OSUNA, Acting Chairman; HOLMES and FILPPU, Board Members. … See sections 240(c)(6) and (7) of the Act; INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139, 140-41 (1981).

Crow-Burlingame Co. v. Commissioner

15 T.C. 738 · United States Tax Court · Nov 29, 1950

Worthen, Kimbro V. Browne and William R. James. 4. … Worthen, Kimbro V. Browne and William R.

Johnson v. United States

149 F. Supp. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1957

Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct.Cl. 647 ; Beamish v. United States, 128 F.Supp. 158 , 130 Ct.Cl. 767 ; Wales v. United States, 132 Ct.Cl. 765 , 130 F.Supp. 900, 903 . … Holliday v.

Hutchinson v. United States

149 F. Supp. 156 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

In Levadi v. … John Cuiffo v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 60 ; Hunter Louis Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; Leo H. Levine v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 774 ; Edward C. MacFarlane v. United States, 134 C.