Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.47s
Air-A-Plane Corporation v. The United States
408 F.2d 1030 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1969
After United States v. … We must remember, too, that the Board appeal was heard well before United States v.
Cited 59 timesPublished5 Ct. Cust. 270 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1914
Prosser v. … United States v. Park & Tilford ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 293, 298 ; T. D. 33514); Windsor v. McVeigh, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDenise Davis v. Department of Defense
2026 MSPB 5 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 9, 2026
Walls v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 29 F.3d 1578, 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … The court in Lal relied on the reasoning in Todd v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 55 F.3d 1574 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 6, 2011
See, e.g., Swann v. Brown, 5 Vet. … Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128, 142 (1997); Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 389, 395- 396 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished3 Vet. App. 503 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 1, 1992
. *506 The Board also erred by employing its own unsubstantiated medical opinion. In Colvin v. … Although the Board need not accept a treating physician’s opinion as dispositive, see Sanden v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 97 (1992), it must provide reasons or bases for rejecting it. Gilbert v.
Cited 36 timesPublished9 Pa. D. & C. 779 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 24, 1927
I am mindful of the statement in the opinion of Attorney-General Brown (Jan. 3,1916, 25 Dist. … The law gives the Industrial Board no power or authority to suspend the operations of the law. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLarry D. Ervin v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 318 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 9, 2011
Citing Karnas v. … Simply because a Board decision was "vacated" does not necessarily imply that vacatur resulted from error. See Gordon v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBorgfeldt & Co. v. United States
11 Ct. Cust. 421 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1923
In United States v. Thomas ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls. 142 , T. … In Hull v. United States ( 10 Ct. Cust. Appls. 211 , T.
Cited 28 timesPublished131 Fed. Cl. 350 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2017
See Foster v. Mabus, 103 F. … Bias has failed to demonstrate that the Board erred in reaching that conclusion. In fact, another decision relied upon by Mr. Bias provides supp01t for the Board's decision. See Hamrick v. United States, 96 F.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSunswick Corporation v. United States
75 F. Supp. 221 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1948
In York Engineering Co. v. … (or of the Wage Adjustment Board when acting for it), being nonenforceable (see National War Labor Board v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015
Thus, those matters are not currently before the Board. See 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.200, 20.201, 20.302; Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … See Nieves-Rodriguez v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295 (2008). The Board notes that the record contains contrary medical opinion evidence; nevertheless, the Board resolves all reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015
AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 39 (1993). … Under these circumstances, the Board also finds that VA has a duty to make a further attempt to obtain the Veteran's private treatment records. Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011
Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(a)(2); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 471 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished140 F. Supp. 420 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956
However, this contention was rejected in the case of Holliday v. … United States, 137 F.Supp. 944 , 131 Ct.Cl. 60 , and Girault v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedVictor B. Skaar v. Douglas A. Collins
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 29, 2025
A "decision of the Board" under 38 U.S.C. § 7252 is defined as "an adjudication with respect to the grant or denial of benefits." Cooper v. McDonough, 38 Vet.App. 1, 7 (2024) (per curiam order) (citing Maggitt v. … Kirkpatrick v.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Ct. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1891
In the case of Brown v. The United States ( 18 C. Cls. … And in the case of Young v. The United States ( 19 C. Cls.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Ct. Cust. 408 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1911
Hilton v. Merritt ( 110 U. S., 97, 107 ); Auffmordt v. Hedden ( 137 U. S., 310, 325 ). … United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16, 19 ); United States v. Klingenberg ( 153 U. S., 93, 101, 104 ); Badger v. Cusimano ( 130 U. S., 39, 43 ); Hilton v. Merritt ( 110 U. S., 97, 106 ); Robertson v. Frank ( 132 U.
Cited 3 timesPublished16 Ct. Cust. 347 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1928
In United States v. Wecker & Co., 16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 220 , T. … In Irvin Massin & Bros., supra, and United States v.
Cited 30 timesPublished80 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2008
Therefore, an FAA employee “may submit an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and may seek judicial review of any resulting final orders or decisions of the Board from any action that was ap-pealable to the Board … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublished135 F. Supp. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1955
We held in Spencer v. United States, supra, and Carlin v. … Plaintiff’s later request for review by the Disability Review Board did not toll the statute. See also Mistretta v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 264 , 128 Ct.Cl. 41 , *527 45. Cf. Louis Rosnick v.
Cited 37 timesPublished
Ask Donna