Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

3.11s

  • Air-A-Plane Corporation v. The United States

    408 F.2d 1030 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1969

    After United States v. … We must remember, too, that the Board appeal was heard well before United States v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • United States v. Monsanto Chemical Works

    21 C.C.P.A. 33 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 12, 1933

    Every such application shall be assigned by the Board of. … Malony v. Adsit, supra; Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. District of Columbia, 195 U. S. 322, 330 ; McCuing v. Bovay, 60 F. (2d) 375, 376; compare Christy v. Pridgeon, 4 Wall. 196, 201, 202 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 11-06 359

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

    The RO did not fully comply with the remand instructions, but as the Board grants in full the benefit sought on appeal there is no prejudice to the Appellant. Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384, 394 (1993). … See, e.g., Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993); VAOPGCPREC 16-92, 57 Fed. Reg. 49,747 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 09-37 151

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 30, 2015

    Wamhoff v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 517, 522 (1996); Zarycki v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 91, 100 (1993); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 190, 193 (1991). … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Arundel Corp. v. United States

    515 F.2d 1116 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1975

    Co. v. … Bailey & Associates v. United States, 196 Ct. Cl. 166, 185 , 449 F. 2d 376, 387 (1971). Too, a plaintiff who seeks to set aside the factual determinations of a Board carries a heavy burden. Donald M. Drake Co. v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • May Co. v. United States

    12 Ct. Cust. 266 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1924

    Kohne v. Insurance Co. ( 1 Wash. C. C. 138 , 165); United States v. … —Brown & Co. et al. v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 207 ; T. D. 40026); Scaramelli v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134 ; T. D. 40056); Keve & Young v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 103 ; T.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • P.L.S. Coat & Suit Corp. v. United States

    180 F. Supp. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

    United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234 , 66 S.Ct. 1000 , 90 L.Ed. 1192 ; United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 735 , 64 S.Ct. 820 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 . … In actions where the decision of the board is contested the plaintiffs must as we stated in Volentine & Littleton v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Merson v. United States

    401 F.2d 184 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1968

    In Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. … Most recently, in the case of Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Killian Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 80 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 16, 1930

    KILLIAN CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Killian Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 37377. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 20 B.T.A. 80 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2203 ; June 16, 1930 , Promulgated *2203 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 12-25 396

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

    See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See Colayong v. West, 12 Vet. App. 524, 532 (1999); Goss v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 109, 114 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • MacFarlane v. United States

    140 F. Supp. 420 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

    However, this contention was rejected in the case of Holliday v. … United States, 137 F.Supp. 944 , 131 Ct.Cl. 60 , and Girault v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • 06-14 287

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

    Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(a)(2); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 471 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Woodruff v. United States

    80 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2008

    Therefore, an FAA employee “may submit an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and may seek judicial review of any resulting final orders or decisions of the Board from any action that was ap-pealable to the Board … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bias v. United States

    124 Fed. Cl. 663 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2016

    ."); Straughter v. United States,120 Fed. … atl-2 (citing Cronin v. United States,765 F.3d 1331, 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2014)). If the govemment had decided in this case to defend the Board's decision based on the record before the Board, Mr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • O-S-G

    24 I. & N. Dec. 56 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2006

    FOR RESPONDENT: Brad Alexander, Esquire, Miami, Florida BEFORE: Board Panel: OSUNA, Acting Chairman; HOLMES and FILPPU, Board Members. … See sections 240(c)(6) and (7) of the Act; INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139, 140-41 (1981).

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. United States

    149 F. Supp. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1957

    Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct.Cl. 647 ; Beamish v. United States, 128 F.Supp. 158 , 130 Ct.Cl. 767 ; Wales v. United States, 132 Ct.Cl. 765 , 130 F.Supp. 900, 903 . … Holliday v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Reynaldo Alvara v. Department of Homeland Security

    2014 MSPB 77 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 29, 2014

    The Board certified the matter to the Special Panel because it found that, when ruling on this case in Petitioner v. … See Horner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 815 F.2d 668, 671 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jane Malloy v. Department of State

    2022 MSPB 14 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 31, 2022

    Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Lal v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 821 F.3d 1376, 1379-80 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Contour Chair-Lounge Co., Inc. v. The Englander Company, Inc.

    324 F.2d 186 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 17, 1964

    Daltroff & Cie v. V. Vivaudou, Inc., 53 F.2d 536 , 19 CCPA 715, 717; Skelly Oil Co. v. The Powerine Co., 86 F.2d 752 , 24 CCPA 790, 792; Coty, Inc. v. … Perfumes Habana, S.A., 190 F.2d 91 , 38 CCPA 1180, 1185; Eureka Williams Corp. v. Willoughby Machine and Tool Co., 194 F.2d 543 , 39 CCPA 832, 833. To the same effect, see the board’s decision in The Julep Company v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Scharf Bros. v. United States

    16 Ct. Cust. 347 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1928

    In United States v. Wecker & Co., 16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 220 , T. … In Irvin Massin & Bros., supra, and United States v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.