Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.69s
21 I. & N. Dec. 479 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996
A motion to reinstate an appeal is required before issues which have been administratively closed can be con- sidered by the Board. See also American Baptist Churches v. … INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314 (1992); INS v. Abudu, supra.
Overruled on other grounds by AVETISYAN, 25 I. & N. Dec. 688 (2012)Cited 57 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 6, 2011
See, e.g., Swann v. Brown, 5 Vet. … Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128, 142 (1997); Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 389, 395- 396 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016
. § 3.303(d); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSunswick Corporation v. United States
75 F. Supp. 221 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1948
In York Engineering Co. v. … (or of the Wage Adjustment Board when acting for it), being nonenforceable (see National War Labor Board v.
Cited 32 timesPublished174 Ct. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966
Cl. 655 (1953); Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 647 (1954); Beamish v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 767 , 128 F. Supp. 158 (1955); Wales v. United States, supra; Prichard v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 212 , 135 F. … Supp. 420 (1955); Towell v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 422 (1960); Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 557 (1961); Thompson v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 158 (1962); and Johnston v. United States, 157 Ct.
Cited 16 timesPublished2 Ct. Cust. 92 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1911
Two cases were subsequently decided by the Board of General Appraisers prior to the enactment of the statute of 1909. In Doggett v. United States (T. … See Shallus v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 556 ; T. D. 31552) and cases cited; United States v. Myers ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 257 ; T. D. 31301); Komada v. United States ( 215 U. S., 392 ).
Cited 10 timesPublished618 F.2d 124 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 26, 1979
See also Savio v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 737 , 740 (1977); Reid v. United States, ante at 864. 2. Plaintiff asserts that the Correction Board committed legal error by failing to grant her a hearing. … There was nothing improper in the Correction Board’s seeking and the Review Board’s submitting this material. Cf. Flute v. United States, supra; Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 1 , 408 F.2d 416 (1969); Proper v.
Cited 6 timesPublished101 F. Supp. 759 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1952
In Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … However, as this court pointed out in McKenzie, Trustee v. United States, 119 C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMarnie Golden v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2023 MSPB 19 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 6, 2023
ANALYSIS ¶5 The Board’s jurisdiction is limited to those matters over which it has been given jurisdiction by law, rule, or regulation. Maddox v. … See Francis v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLisa J. Hess v. United States Postal Service
2016 MSPB 40 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2016
West v. … Rosso v.
Cited 1 timesPublished99 Fed. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 1, 2011
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Because fraud as a cause of action lies in tort, the [United States Court of Federal Claims] concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction[.]”). … The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, howev *782 er, has held that a separate claim does not accrue when an administrative board denies relief. See Hurick v.
Cited 5 timesPublished172 F. Supp. 445 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1959
Uhley v. United States, 121 F.Supp. 674 , 128 Ct.Cl. 608 ; id., 147 F.Supp. 497 , 137 Ct.Cl. 275 ; Furlong v. United States, 146 F.Supp. 823 , 152 F.Supp. 238 , 138 Ct.Cl. 843 ; Friedman v. … Rosnick v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 478 , 132 Ct.Cl. 1, 6 ; Capps v. United States, 137 F.Supp. 721 , 133 Ct.Cl. 811 ; Kearney v. United States, Ct.Cl., 156 F.Supp. 928 . .
Cited 16 timesPublished654 F.2d 68 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1981
As well as in the cases following Sanders, e.g., Hary v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 10 , 618 F.2d 704 (1980); Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct. Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 (1981). … Our determination that plaintiff effectively sought voiding by the Correction Board of the prior passovers removes this case from our holdings in DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct.
Cited 12 timesPublishedJames L. Hamlin v. The United States
391 F.2d 941 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968
Defendant has cited McMullen v. … In the instant case, the Correction Board was the first board to consider plaintiff’s claim, and the case is governed by Harper v.
Cited 12 timesPublished23 I. & N. Dec. 462 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002
V 1999). 1 The Immigration and Naturalization Service has appealed from the Immigration Judge’s decision. The appeal will be sustained, and the record will be remanded for further proceedings. … See generally INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24 (1976).
Cited 73 timesPublished2 Vet. App. 621 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 22, 1992
The Board affirmed the RO decision on May 2, 1991. … Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 66 (1990); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). It is to be hoped that under firm leadership, the Board will be persuaded to part from its old ways.
Cited 75 timesPublished1 Ct. Cust. 181 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1911
Muser v. Magone ( 155 U. … United States v. Passavant ( 169 U. S., 16, 19 ); United States v. Klingenberg ( 153 U. S., 93, 101, 104 ); Badger v. Cusimano ( 130 U. S., 39,43 ); Hilton v. Merritt ( 110 U. S., 97, 106 ); Robertson v. Frank ( 132 U.
Cited 21 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015
Cohen v. Brown, supra, at 142; Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 389, 395-396 (1996). … See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994); see also Beno v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 439 (1992).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished12 Ct. Cust. 354 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1924
The case of The Lace House v. United States, ( 141 Fed. 869 ; T. … —The Lace House v. United States ( 141 Fed. 869 ; T. D. 26970). In United States v. Independent Importing Co. ( 165 Fed. 63 ) the court reversed the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers in T. D. 28250 (G.
Cited 16 timesPublished9 Pa. D. & C. 779 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 24, 1927
I am mindful of the statement in the opinion of Attorney-General Brown (Jan. 3,1916, 25 Dist. … The law gives the Industrial Board no power or authority to suspend the operations of the law. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna