Case law

James Patrick Pierotti v. Office of Personnel Management

2016 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 27, 2016

In determining whether living expenses are “ordinary and necessary,” the Board applies a reasonable person test, regardless of the individual’s accustomed standard of living. Zelenka v. … When an appellant’s monthly expense exceeds his monthly income, the Board has reduced OPM’s repayment schedule to $5 a month. Knox v.

Hatmaker v. United States

117 Fed. Cl. 560 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2014

v. … Although a review board is not required to discuss every medical record in evidence, Rebosky v. United States, 60 Fed.

Chicago Bears Football Club and NFL Properties LLC v. 12th Man/Tennessee LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Feb 28, 2007

Wilson v. … University Book Store v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, 33 USPQ2d 1385, 1406 (TTAB 1994)(footnote omitted).

Santana v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 51 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2016

.”); Hernandez v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 532, 536–37 (1997); Brezler v. Mills, 86 F. … Whether or not this was an adequate request for a special board, see Crumley v. United States, 122 Fed.

Rasmussen v. United States

543 F.2d 134 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1976

The Board could not examine again evidence not previously examined by the Region, and not already in the record. Cf. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 714-15, 717 (1963); Chandler v. … Kozak v. United States, supra. In Vogt v. United States, 150 Ct.

In re National Credit Union Administration Board Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation

996 F. Supp. 2d 1374 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Feb 12, 2014

No. 2:11-02340 National Credit Union Administration Board v. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, C.A. No. 2:11-02649 National Credit Union Administration Board v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al., C.A. … No. 1:13-06719 National Credit Union Administration Board v. RBS Securities, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:13-06726 *1377 National Credit Union Administration Board v. Barclays Capital, Inc., C.A.

Jane Malloy v. Department of State

2022 MSPB 14 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 31, 2022

Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Lal v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 821 F.3d 1376, 1379-80 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Merson v. United States

401 F.2d 184 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1968

In Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. … Most recently, in the case of Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.

13-11 649

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166-67 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 505 (1995). … See Brock v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 155, 162-164 (1997); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1044 (Fed. Cir. 1994), citing 38 U.S.C.A. § 1113(b) and 1116 and 38 C.F.R. § 3.303.

P. L. Thomas Paper Co. v. United States

28 Ct. Int'l Trade 503 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 15, 2004

Andrews & Co. of Mass. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 354 (1965). The merchandise at issue there was paper board, which plaintiff claimed was classifiable as “wrapping paper.” … Moberly, Inc. v. United States, 924 F.2d 232, 235 (Fed. Cir. 1991)); see also Rohm & Haas Co. v. United States, 727 F.2d 1095, 1097 (Fed.

Quarles v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 129 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 19, 1992

See Kuo v. … See Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589, 593 (1991); Hatlestad I, 1 Vet.App. at 167; see also Douglas v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 435, 438-39 (1992) (Douglas II); Douglas v.

Hoppock v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963

Girault v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 135, 144 , 135 F. Supp. 521, 526 (1955). See Lipp v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 197, 201 , 301 F. 2d 674, 676 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 (1963); Friedman v. … Particularly Proper v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 511 , 154 F. Supp. 317 (1957), and Patterson v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 435 (1958).

Vita Food Products, Inc. v. United States

24 C.C.P.A. 248 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1936

As authorities for the foregoing, this court cited the cases of Bogle v. Magone, 152 U. S. 623 ; Vitelli & Son v. United States, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 75 , T. D. 33313, and Stein, Hirsch & Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. … Brown & Co. et al. v. United States, T. D. 40726, 47 Treas.

12-06 877

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). … The Board finds "could be" falls short of probable. See generally Obert v. Brown, 5 Vet.

Kuhne Identification Systems, Inc. v. United States

82 Ct. Cl. 237 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936

Leggett v. Avery, 101 U. S. 256 ; Shepard v. Carrigan, 116 U. S. 593 ; Crawford v. Hey *260 singer, 123 U. S. 589, 606 ; Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. United States Cartridge Co., 112 U. S. 624 . … Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co., 250 U. S. 383, 386 ; George V. Perkins, 1 Fed. (2d) 978. Dr. Brown was not an employee of Drummond. Drummond simply went to Dr.

Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United States

331 F. Supp. 3d 1390 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 29, 2018

Co. v. United States, 41 CIT ___, ___, 203 F. … Co. v. United States, 41 CIT ___, ___, 234 F. Supp. 3d 1322, 1330 (2017) (quoting SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp., 439 F.3d 1312, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2006)); Dorbest Ltd. v.

09-36 369

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

While the Veteran's assertions regarding pain and its onset are admissible, Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. … See Russo v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 46 (1996).

13-14 106

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

See, e.g., Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994). … Id.; see also Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88 (1996). Further, the Board notes that under Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed.

In re DC Comics, Inc.

689 F.2d 1042 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 30, 1982

See, e.g., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. … Ives Laboratories v. Darby Drug Co., 601 F.2d 631 , 643, 202 USPQ 548 , 557 (CA2 1979) (quoting Pagliero v. Wallace China Co., 198 F.2d 339, 343 , 95 USPQ 45 , 48 (CA9 1962)); Truck Equipment Service Co. v.

13-03 913

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

Heuer v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 379 (1995); Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 398 (1995); Caldwell v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 466 (1991). Moreover, the Board finds the Veteran to be credible. … The Veteran has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). These claims must be afforded expeditious treatment.