Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.89s
Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United States
434 F.2d 1333 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1970
See Mathis v. United States, 391 F.2d 938 , 183 Ct.Cl. 145 (1968); Wood v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl, 955 (1968); Hixon v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 949 (1968). … Anthony v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 923 (1967); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 261, 264 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 838 , 85 S.Ct. 76 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964).
Cited 40 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 1, 2017
See, e.g., Browning v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of the United States, 72 P.2d 1060, 1068 (Utah 1937); 6 CORBIN, CONTRACTS§§ 1276, 1279 (1962). … United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChicago Bears Football Club and NFL Properties LLC v. 12th Man/Tennessee LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Feb 28, 2007
Wilson v. … University Book Store v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, 33 USPQ2d 1385, 1406 (TTAB 1994)(footnote omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 51 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2016
.”); Hernandez v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 532, 536–37 (1997); Brezler v. Mills, 86 F. … Whether or not this was an adequate request for a special board, see Crumley v. United States, 122 Fed.
Cited 7 timesPublished142 F. Supp. 927 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956
Under the terms of the trust agreement the trustee was directed to pay the net income derived therefrom to Rowan McHugh Brown for a period of 10 years or until the death of Rowan McHugh Brown, whichever event should first … At the time of the execution of the trust agreement, Rowan McHugh Brown, the beneficiary, was 46 years of age, married, and had one dependent son, Benjamin McHugh Brown, who was 18 years of age.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 30, 2021
Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … TRUEBA Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board K. McDuffie, Counsel The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 30, 2021
Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … TRUEBA Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board K. McDuffie, Counsel The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015
While the Veteran's assertions regarding pain and its onset are admissible, Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. … See Russo v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 46 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished536 F.2d 365 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976
See, e.g., Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600, 610 (1974). … [Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 155 (1974)]. In the instant case, both Cook and the Government had an identical interest in the accuracy, completeness and quality of the medical evidence presented to the Board.
Cited 4 timesPublished25 I. & N. Dec. 61 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009
In Melnitsenko v. … Similarly, in Ahmed v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedFred J. Vigil v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 63 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 2008
. § 7261 (a)(1); Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. … so that the Board may consider the Secretary’s clarifying statement when assessing the applicability of this regulation in this case. 3 See Tucker v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015
Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32, 44 (2011); see 38 C.F.R. § 4.40 (2014); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 205-6 (1995). … App. 303, 311-12 (2007) (once VA provides an examination to a Veteran, VA has a duty to ensure that the examination is adequate for evaluation purposes); Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKuhne Identification Systems, Inc. v. United States
82 Ct. Cl. 237 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936
Leggett v. Avery, 101 U. S. 256 ; Shepard v. Carrigan, 116 U. S. 593 ; Crawford v. Hey *260 singer, 123 U. S. 589, 606 ; Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. United States Cartridge Co., 112 U. S. 624 . … Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co., 250 U. S. 383, 386 ; George V. Perkins, 1 Fed. (2d) 978. Dr. Brown was not an employee of Drummond. Drummond simply went to Dr.
Cited 15 timesPublished117 Fed. Cl. 560 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2014
v. … Although a review board is not required to discuss every medical record in evidence, Rebosky v. United States, 60 Fed.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.
670 F.2d 1024 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 18, 1982
cases, this court criticized the practice of the board in not deciding all issues within the inter partes proceeding. 8 Nevertheless, the practice of the board continued until its decision in Norac Co. v. … Lefkowitz, Recent Changes in Practice Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 69 Trademark Rep. 479 (1979). . See Roux Laboratories, Inc. v.
Cited 273 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2014
Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … App. 30, 33 (1993); see also Beausoleil v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 459, 463 (1996); Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 521, 523 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished76 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1932
See Brothers v. United States, 52 C.Cls. 462, 467. Rusell's case, 182 U.S. 516 . … See Brothers v. United States, supra, 52 C.Cls., 462 ; 250 U.S. 88 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn re National Credit Union Administration Board Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation
996 F. Supp. 2d 1374 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Feb 12, 2014
No. 2:11-02340 National Credit Union Administration Board v. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, C.A. No. 2:11-02649 National Credit Union Administration Board v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al., C.A. … No. 1:13-06719 National Credit Union Administration Board v. RBS Securities, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:13-06726 *1377 National Credit Union Administration Board v. Barclays Capital, Inc., C.A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 6, 2015
Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see also Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 253 (1999), citing Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996). … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995) (finding that a medical nexus opinion can provide the link between service and a current disability).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJames Patrick Pierotti v. Office of Personnel Management
2016 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 27, 2016
In determining whether living expenses are “ordinary and necessary,” the Board applies a reasonable person test, regardless of the individual’s accustomed standard of living. Zelenka v. … When an appellant’s monthly expense exceeds his monthly income, the Board has reduced OPM’s repayment schedule to $5 a month. Knox v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna