Case law

Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. the United States 07-157c, 07-167c

114 Fed. Cl. 146 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2013

Co. v. United States, (No. 07-157C), Dkt. No. 47; and Order, California ex rel. Brown v. United States, (No. 07- 184C), Dkt. No. 55. … Co. v. United States, (No. 07-157C), Dkt. No. 259, 105 Fed. Cl. 420 (2012) and Published Opinion, California ex rel. Brown v. United States, (No. 07-184C), Dkt. No. 228, 105 Fed.

A-1 Amusement Co. v. United States

48 Fed. Cl. 63 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2000

The Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 161-63 , 120 S.Ct. 1291, 1316 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

Hertzog v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

In Eicks v. United States, 145 Ct. … In Proper v. United States, 139 Ct.

LC Trademarks, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 29, 2016

See Bond v. … Velcro, Inc. v.

14-101 45

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

Brown, 6 Vet. App. 242, 245 (1994); see Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d at 1380-81 (expressly adopting the "manifestly changed outcome" standard). … See Thompson v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 251, 253 (1991); Crippen v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 412, 424 (1996); see also Damrel, 6 Vet.

Dayley v. United States

169 Ct. Cl. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Lipp v. United States, supra; Friedman v. United States, supra; Robinson v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 235 (1963); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 261 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 838 (1964); Dye v. … Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S. 31, 35-37 (1893) ; Wayne United Gas Co. v.

Meurlin v. Commissioner

25 T.C. 118 · United States Tax Court · Oct 27, 1955

Brown, M. … Co. v. Commissioner, 222 F. 2d 355 .

Gary Davis v. Department of Defense

2022 MSPB 20 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 8, 2022

Williamson v. U.S. Postal Service, 106 M.S.P.R. 502, ¶ 9 (2007); see Haasz v. … FOR THE BOARD: /s/ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.

Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United States

416 F.2d 1345 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1969

Given this record, it cannot be concluded that the Board’s findings are invalid. Sternberger v. United States, supra; Clack v. United States, 395 F.2d 773, 777 , 184 Ct.Cl. 40, 46 (1968). … That “the Board did not fully articulate its computations” (Phillips Constr. Co. v.

Brenner v. United States

202 Ct. Cl. 678 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1973

As long ago as Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296 (1911), as explicitly as Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953), Norman v. United States, 183 Ct. … Payson v. Franke, supra, at 854. Selection boards are composed of carefully chosen senior officers.

Rood v. United States

63 Fed. Cl. 213 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 2004

Rood on this issue, the BCNR found that the improper constitution of the board did not void the proceedings. Id. Therefore, in 1999, Mr. Rood filed the Rood v. Danzig complaint in the U.S. … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 41 (1983) (emphasis in original); see, e.g., Steam v. Dep’t of the Navy, 280 F.3d 1376 , 1380 (Fed.Cir.2002); Case, Inc. v.

Crumley v. United States

122 Fed. Cl. 803 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2015

. § 1558(f); Reduction in v. … Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (citing United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 (2002)).

Denton v. United States

204 Ct. Cl. 188 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1974

In DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. … Tn fact, this court has previously approved the backdating of discharges and releases by Correction Boards. O'Callahan v. United States, 196 Ct. Cl. 556 , 451 F. 2d 1390 (1971); Mercereau v. United States, 155 Ct.

Hallowell v. Commissioner

39 B.T.A. 50 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 5, 1939

The respondent cites Hill v. Commissioner, 38 Fed. (2d) 165; Pope v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 420; W. Frank Carter, 36 B. T. A. 60; Arthur C. Hilmer, 27 B. T. … The language of the Board in James Brown, 10 B. T.

07-06 543

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007) (citing Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405, 407 (1994)). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 206 (1995).

United States v. Bracher

13 Ct. Cust. 432 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 18, 1926

Any defects of form in the petitions under these circumstances, in our judgment, would not invalidate the judgment of the board. Meyer & Lange et al. v. United States, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 422 ; Stockton et al. v. … Mutual Building, etc. v. Bossieux , Fed. Cas. No. 9977; vol. 17; Wallace v. Clark, Fed. Cas. No. 17098, vol. 29; Russell v. McLellan, Fed. Cas.

Grieg v. United States

640 F.2d 1261 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1981

Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953). The court said in Reale v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 1010 , 1013, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 854 (1976): Plaintiff sees us as made into a sort of super Correction Board by Pub. … Guy v. United States, supra.

12-32 137

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015

Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 467, 470-71 (1993). As such, the Board may appropriately favor the opinion of one competent medical authority over another. See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.

Abad Esteve Corp. v. United States

4 Cust. Ct. 315 · United States Customs Court · Jun 6, 1940

He was asked to give the significance of the term “brown” as applied to the mer *317 chandise and stated that brown rice is rice which is steamed but neither brushed nor polished. … The record in this case persuades us that the rice in question is similar in all material respects to that which was involved in the Southern Rice Sales Co., Inc. v. United States, 25 C. C. P. A. 201, T. D. 49304.

Walker v. United States

117 Fed. Cl. 304 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2014

I accepted Major Walker's wishes and did not represent her at the board. On December 3, 2005, the Administrative Separation Board was convened to consider whether to separate Ms. … S 1491(a)(2); Reeves v. United States,49 Fed. C|.560,569-70 (2001); Brown v. United States,3 Ct. Ct.31 (1983), aff'd, 741 F .2d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 1984).