Case law

15-39 275

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 20, 2018

These matters come before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Louisville, Kentucky. … Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. DEREK R. BROWN Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals

Mystery Ranch, Ltd. v. Terminal Moraine Inc. dba Moraine Sales

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 30, 2022

Ass’n, 117 USPQ2d at 1496; Board of Trustees v. … Brown-Forman Corp., 47 USPQ2d 1875, 1887 (TTAB 1998) (“[I]t is unclear to the Board how it is possible for applicant’s mark to point uniquely and unmistakably to both of the opposers.”); NASA v.

Gary Davis v. Department of Defense

2022 MSPB 20 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 8, 2022

Williamson v. U.S. Postal Service, 106 M.S.P.R. 502, ¶ 9 (2007); see Haasz v. … FOR THE BOARD: /s/ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.

Sullivan v. United States

46 Fed. Cl. 480 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2000

United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 556, 559 (1996); Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1156, 1158-59 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1111 , 116 S.Ct. 909 , 133 L.Ed.2d 841 (1996). … Final decisions on such appeals shall be made by the Board. The Board shall decide any such appeal only after affording the claimant an opportunity for a hearing.

Borm v. Champayne

102 F.2d 862 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1939

Peters v. Hopkins, 34 App. D. C. 141; Orvis F. Rowe v. Frederick C. Holtz, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 964, 55 F. (2d) 465; Garand v. Pedersen, 22 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1161, 76 F. (2d) 407. … Townsend v. Henry L. Smith, supra; Sarah E. Nolop v. Samuel Herbert Smith, supra; Fenton R. Brydle v. Harry H.

Smalls v. United States

87 Fed. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2009

In May 1994, plaintiff filed an appeal with the Board of Veterans Appeals (“BVA”). … See Spehr v.

Nibali v. United States

589 F.2d 514 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

Universal Camera Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 296, 303-04 (8th Cir. 1953); Victor Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 834, 838-39 (D.C. Cir. 1953); National Labor Relations Board v.

Lins v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 772 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1984

Brown v. Felsen, supra, 442 U.S. at 131 , 99 S.Ct. at 2209 ; see also Hasson v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 615 , 618 F.2d 121 (1979). … See Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co., 640 F.2d 484, 493 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878 , 102 S.Ct. 359 , 70 L.Ed.2d 188 (1981); Boruski v.

The United States (Index Industrial Corp., Party in Interest) v. National Starch Products, Inc.

318 F.2d 737 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1962

United States v. H. V. Albrecht, etc., 27 CCPA 112, 117, C.A.D. 71; W. T. Grant Co. v. United States, 38 CCPA 57, 65, C.A.D. 440; United States v. … See also Strakosh v. United States, 1 CCPA 360, T.D. 31453, United States v. Danker & Marston, 2 CCPA 462, T.D. 32208, Tiffany v. United States, 2 Cir., 105 F. 766 , and the charge to the jury in Fisk et al. v.

Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. United States

2 Cust. Ct. 935 · United States Customs Court · May 10, 1939

Cottman & Co. v. United States, 20 C. C. P. A. 344, T. D. 46114, decided December 19, 1932. … This untoward result actually happened in United States v. Gane & Ingram, 24 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 42264; United States v. Manahan Chemical Co., Inc., 24 C. C. P. A. 53, T. D. 48333; United States v. Philipp Wirth, 24 C.

Contract Custom Drapery Service, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,105 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1984

Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713, 728 (2d Cir.1983); Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429, 432-33 (3d Cir.1979); Cincinnati Electronics Corp. v. … In the context of the Board’s lack of jurisdiction over the claim before it, as discussed previously, such a finding is deemed of no significance.

Fluor Federal Solutions, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 8, 2022

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. … Inc. v. West, 108 F.3d 319, 320 (Fed.

In re Watson

517 F.2d 465 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 5, 1975

The board’s opinion does not mention the rejection based on the first paragraph of § 112. Since the board did not reverse this rejection made by the examiner, the board is deemed to have affirmed the rejection. … The board affirmed the examiner.

Cook v. United States

536 F.2d 365 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

See, e.g., Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600, 610 (1974). … [Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 155 (1974)]. In the instant case, both Cook and the Government had an identical interest in the accuracy, completeness and quality of the medical evidence presented to the Board.

Fred J. Vigil v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 63 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 2008

. § 7261 (a)(1); Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. … so that the Board may consider the Secretary’s clarifying statement when assessing the applicability of this regulation in this case. 3 See Tucker v.

08-36 907

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995) (en banc). … In making all determinations, the Board must fully consider the lay assertions of record. A layperson is competent to report on the onset and recurrent symptoms. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Special Counsel ex rel. Dale Klein v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2017 MSPB 6 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 19, 2017

Dale Klein, Petitioner, v. … Dale Klein v. Department of Veterans Affairs, MSPB Docket Nos.

Christopher Andreski v. Department of Justice

2024 MSPB 10 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 30, 2024

E.g., Kerr v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 908 F.3d 1307, 1315 (Fed. … We find that this is inapplicable here because the Board has jurisdiction over an IRA appeal if the appellant establishes the jurisdictional requirements. See McCray v.

J-S

24 I. & N. Dec. 520 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

Ass’n v. … Rapanos v.

13-30 643

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994). … See Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 225, 229 (1993).