Case law

Rios-Collins v. Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 104 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 2006

See Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994) ("interpretive doubt is to be resolved in the veteran's favor"); Boyer v. West, 210 F.3d 1351, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2000); McKnight v. Gober, 131 F.3d 1483, 1485 (Fed. … See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158 (Fed.

Frank E. Lipp v. The United States

301 F.2d 674 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962

Levine v. United States, 137 *676 F.Supp. 955, 133 Ct.Cl. 774 ; Rosnick v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 478 , 132 Ct. Cl. 1 ; Girault v. United States, supra; Duff v. … In Girault v. United States, supra, it was held that “All of these boards, * * * act only in an advisory capacity to the Secretary of War.

15-05 080

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 29, 2015

It is the Board's fundamental responsibility to evaluate the probative value of all medical and lay evidence. See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 429 (1995); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. … App. 36 (1994); see also Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.

09-05 328

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 17, 2012

See Struck v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 145, 152 (1996); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 40 (1994); Abernathy v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 461, 465 (1992); Simon v. … See Sklar v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 140 (1993); Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 458 (1993); Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 467, 470-71 (1993); Swann v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 229, 232 (1993).

McLane v. Commissioner

46 T.C. 140 · United States Tax Court · Apr 29, 1966

Petitioner seeks nourishment from Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965), and United States v. Midland-Boss Corp., 381 U.S. 54 (1965). … Compare Bookwalter v. Brecklein, supra. Petitioner’s case is clearly one of “overkill.” See Commissioner v. Brown, supra at 519 .

Collinwood Shale Brick and Supply Co. v. Bowers

78 Ohio Law. Abs. 457 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 31, 1957

This conveyor is used exclusively in removing coal from railroad cars to the kiln, where it is used to fire the kilns. (4) Browning Bucket Crane. Pages 29 to 32 of the Record. … O. 381; Terteling Bros., Inc. v. Glander, 151 Oh St 236, 39 O. O. 60; Mead Corporation v. Glander, 153 Oh St 539, 42 O. O. 24; and The Boardman Supply Co. v.

Petitfils v. Commissioner

24 B.T.A. 1090 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 7, 1931

PETITFILS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Petitfils v. Commissioner Docket No. 37763. … Petitfils and the Brown Candy Corporation and the permit issued by the commissioner of corporations.

09-29 717

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

In making all determinations, the Board must fully consider the lay assertions of record. A layperson is competent to report on the onset and recurrence of symptoms. See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. … See Dalton v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 23, 38 (2007); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 511 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

Borg v. Commissioner

50 T.C. 257 · United States Tax Court · May 7, 1968

Co. v. Farnham, 1 Okla. 375 , 33 Pac. 867 (1893). … Gilman v. Commissioner, 53 F. 2d 47, 50 (C.A. 8, 1931). Accord, United States v. Virgin, 230 F. 2d 880 (C.A. 5, 1956); Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. Commissioner, 122 F. 2d 347 (C.A. 4, 1941).

Corrigan v. United States

35 C.C.P.A. 10 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 20, 1947

This view is sustained by Brown & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. *16 Cust. Appls. 93 , although the point there involved was only one of jurisdiction of the Board. [Italics ours.] … A. v. Morgenthau, 74 App. D.

W. H. Hill Co. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 1351 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 27, 1931

HILL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. W. H. Hill Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 20573. … Brown, Esq., for the petitioner. John D. Foley Esq., and John D. Maddox, Esq., for the respondent.

Coulter Ventures, LLC v. Monster Energy Company

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 7, 2023

Board noted—relying on Newegg Inc. v. … The Board, like other courts, has inherent authority to manage its docket. Coffee Studio LLC v. Reign LLC, 129 USPQ2d 1480, 1482 n.7 (TTAB 2019); Carrini, Inc. v.

14-23 197

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

See, e.g., Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994). … Id.; see also Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88 (1996). Further, the Board notes that under Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed.

A-T

24 I. & N. Dec. 617 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

Id. at 318 (quoting Marquez v. … Bah v. Mukasey, supra, at 115. The Board’s opinions do not reflect this important point.6 III.

Moore v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 134 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 3, 2003

See, e.g., Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 (1941); Chouteau v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 122 Mo. 375 , 22 S.W. 458 (1893); Jordan v. Stallings, 911 S.W.2d 653, 658 (Mo.Ct.App.1995). … Brown v. Weare is particularly instructive in the application of this rule.

08-36 588

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

See 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.40, 4.45; DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 204-07 (1995). … See Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 7 (1996).

In re Daniels

177 F.2d 283 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 30, 1949

As illustrative of the respective groups we follow the example set by the board and quote Nos. 10 and 17: 10. … When air is present, the hot resin is oxidized at the surface, forming a brown film which does not melt and is not affected by organic solvents.

Integra Biosciences Corp.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 24, 2022

Sarda King Ltd., 2019 USPQ2d 149090, at *6 (TTAB 2019) (the Board considers the factual situation at the time of trial). Cf. Grote Indus., Inc. v. … The Board in Kasco observed: Moreover, the record in [Kasco Corp. v. Southern Saw Serv.

Cathy Covington v. Department of the Interior

2023 MSPB 5 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 13, 2023

Oram v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 2021-2307, 2022 WL 866327 (Fed. Cir. … See Reid v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 508 F.3d 674, 678 (Fed.

Hamrick v. United States

96 F. Supp. 940 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1951

also before us in Womer v. … See Robertson v. Chambers, 341 U.S. 37 , 71 S.Ct. 547 . The review board had the same powers exercised by or vested in the original retiring board.